00:05 - ITS RELATION WE'RE CONDUCTING

00:07 - THIS SEARCH REMOTELY.

00:09 - THE COURT FOUND THAT PROCEED IN

00:11 - THIS MATTER RATHER CANCELING OR

00:14 - POSTPONING THE SESSION. AS WE

00:16 - CONSIDER QUITE KNOW THAT FOR

00:18 - SOME IN UNIFORM. EVEN IN

00:22 - A RELATIVELY DIFFICULT TIMES.

00:25 - ADDITIONALLY OUR COURT IS NOT

00:26 - BASED ON COUNTS. BUT DUE TO

00:29 - THE INMATES. YES, YES, WE HAVE

00:31 - DEVELOPED THE

00:32 - PRESSURE ON. SHE CONTROLLED ALL

00:35 - COUNCIL WHO WILL BE LOOKING

00:37 - FOR.

00:39 - JOHNNY SPEAKING COUNCIL OR I

00:42 - HAVE FALLEN HALEIGH MAXIMUM OF

00:45 - 20 MINUTES. WITH

00:47 - FAST AND THE FIRST OF SEVERAL

00:49 - MINUTES RESERVE FORM OF

00:51 - THE STATE. AND THE FINAL WHY IN

00:53 - A FEW MINUTES, WE'RE CLOSING

00:55 - REMARKS. WE WOULD ASK COUNCIL

00:58 - TEAM KEEP AN EYE ON

00:59 - THEIR WATCHES. BUT WE SURE KNOW

01:02 - OR THEM AS WE APPROACH THE

01:05 - CONCLUSION,

01:05 - THE ARGUMENT IS IT A CONCERN

01:08 - RISING FROM PUBLIC VIEW.

01:11 - JUSTICES YOU HAVE QUESTIONS

01:14 - IT'S LIKE FOR THEM. SO THE

01:16 - COUNCIL MIGHT FOCUS OR

01:17 - ATTENTION ON THE JUSTICE ASKS

01:20 - YOU A QUESTION. OR

01:22 - FIND ME AS USE CUSTOM. I WILL.

01:25 - BRIEFLY STATE'S CASE. IN HER

01:28 - REMY ISSUE BEFORE THE BOOK.

01:32 - PLEASE CALL THE FIRST CASE.

01:37 - FIRST IS MATTER COMMONWEALTH OF

01:38 - PENNSYLVANIA WITH A DEGREE IN A

01:41 - DARK HOLE

01:42 - IN IT.

01:42 - >>REPORTS COMING IN THAT ROOM

01:44 - IS EVEN A CHOSEN REPRESENTING

01:47 - CHESAPEAKE ENERGY IS DANIEL

01:48 - KEEP BRIGHT REPRESENTING THE

01:50 - COMMONWEALTH IS

01:53 - HE'S A GOOD MARKING UP. AND

01:56 - MISTER COUSIN MISTER CLARK.

01:58 - I LOVE YOU REQUESTED GO.

02:00 - AND BIG RED AN ADDITIONAL

02:02 - 4 MONTHS. PRESENT

02:04 - YOUR CASE AND WE'RE STILL A

02:06 - FEW POUNDS. I DON'T AND YOU'D

02:08 - BE DIVIDING WE'RE 30 MINUTES.

02:12 - STARR WITH MISTER PRISON.

02:14 - IN TERMS OF THE ISSUE BEFORE

02:15 - THE COURT.

02:17 - PALACE ARE ENERGY COMPANIES

02:19 - THAT

02:19 - EXECUTED LISI WHAT HAS BEEN

02:22 - YOUR RESIDENCE FOR NATURAL GAS

02:24 - EXTRACTION.

02:26 - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FILED A

02:27 - LAWSUIT. YES,

02:29 - THE PALINS PERCENT OF THE ARM

02:31 - FOR TRADE PROPERTY IS CONSUMER

02:33 - PROTECTION LAW.

02:35 - ALLEGING THAT THEY USED TO

02:37 - SHOCK YOU THAT MEETING, I'M

02:40 - SURE TALKING SECURING THE

02:42 - LEAST. AND ALSO LIKE TO

02:44 - BE RESTRAINED. GREAT.

02:47 - PLUS ARE CHALLENGING THE

02:48 - APPLICABILITY THERE ARE

02:50 - PROTECTIONS ALL DOWN GIVEN

02:53 - THEIR STATUS CLASSY.

02:56 - A CALLOUS ALL FOR YOU. I TRUST

02:59 - CLAIMS WE'RE ON AVAILABLE.

03:01 - UNDER THE STATUTE. MR COUSINS.

03:06 - THANK YOU YOUR HONOR CORRECTLY

03:08 - SNEAKERS A FRIEND OF GEORGIA.

03:10 - IT IS THE OVERREACH OF THE U.S.

03:12 - ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE FAULTY

03:14 - REASONING OF THE COMMONWEALTH

03:15 - COURT WHICH BRINGS US HERE

03:16 - TODAY. THIS COURT GRANTED A

03:18 - HELICOPTER FROM THE PURPOSE OF

03:20 - THAT

03:20 - HER MONEY WHETHER THE ATTORNEY

03:22 - GENERAL HAD THE RIGHT UNDER THE

03:23 - SEAT, YOU KNOW THE EXERCISE

03:25 - ENFORCEMENT POWERS AGAINST

03:27 - BUYERS RATHER THAN SELLERS.

03:29 - THESE ALLIES, THE CDL AS AN

03:31 - ANTI-TRUST LAW THAT EXERCISE

03:33 - SUCH ENFORCEMENT POWERS OVER

03:35 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS

03:36 - GENERAL. THERE WAS A STATUTORY

03:39 - CONSTRUCTION. THE TEXT OF THE

03:41 - ACT AND THE LEGISLATIVE HISTORY

03:43 - SAY NO.

03:44 - BUT THE COMMONWEALTH COURT

03:45 - ANALYSIS IS SIMPLE AND WRONG.

03:47 - >>WARREN ALL THESE ARE SALES.

03:50 - 2 THE SALES PITCH IN THE SECOND

03:53 - PHRASE OF THE DEFINITION OF

03:54 - TRADE AND COMMERCE. WITH THE

03:56 - WORDS AND INCLUDES IS A

03:58 - CATCH-ALL OF SELLERS AND BUYERS

04:00 - UNDER A DICTIONARY DEFINITION.

04:02 - AND 3 WITH ROUNDUP NOW IN

04:05 - THE HAT. THEY HOLD ANYONE

04:07 - CONNECTED MUSCLE TRANSACTION,

04:09 - MAYBE SO BY THE ATTORNEY

04:10 - GENERAL. UNDER THE CPL. SINCE

04:13 - ITS ENACTMENT IN 1968. NO

04:16 - PENNSYLVANIA COURT UNTIL NOW AS

04:19 - EVERY INTERPRETED THE C E O

04:21 - THAT'S WHAT THE RISE IN MCLEAN

04:22 - BYRON BEHALF OF THE SUMMER

04:24 - AGAINST THE PERSON WHO ACQUIRE

04:26 - SOMETHING FROM A SELLER OR I

04:28 - SEPARATELY OVER RISING WRITING

04:30 - BY ACTION AGAINST

04:31 - THE PERSON SIMPLY BECAUSE THAT

04:33 - PERSON IS INVOLVED IN ANY FORM

04:35 - OF COMMERCIAL TRANSACTION.

04:36 - EARLIER IN

04:37 - THIS CASE. THE AGING CONCEDE

04:40 - THAT ANADARKO WAS A FIRE

04:42 - AND THAT THE LANDOWNERS WERE

04:43 - SUMMERS IN THESE TRANSACTIONS.

04:46 - THE TEXT CPL AND DEFINITION OF

04:48 - TRADE

04:49 - AND COMMERCE CAIN'S NEVER TEXT

04:51 - REALLY MERKEL MAGICALLY.

04:53 - THE SUGGESTION THAT TRADE AND

04:54 - COMMERCE HAS 2 SEPARATE ME AND

04:57 - THAT THE SECOND MEANS A SECTION

04:59 - OF LIES THE BUSINESS

05:00 - TRANSACTIONS GENERAL.

05:02 - AND THE DOOR WAS NOT

05:03 - ADVERTISING IS NOT

05:05 - SERVICE E IS NOT OFFERING ANY

05:07 - SERVICE OR PROPERTY IS NOT

05:09 - SELLING A SERVICE

05:10 - OR PROPERTY AND IT IS NOT

05:12 - DISTRIBUTE THE SERVICE OR

05:13 - PROPERTY TO THE

05:14 - BOTTOM LINE. AND OUR CREW IS

05:16 - NOT ENGAGED IN TRADE AND

05:17 - COMMERCE AS DEFINED BY THE CPL

05:20 - ITS TERMS OR ANY APPLICABLE TO

05:22 - THE TRANSACTIONS

05:23 - IN QUESTION. THE ENTRY INTO

05:25 - WORLD AGAINST ISIS PLANTED OR

05:27 - COLOR TRANSACTIONS, NOT COVERED

05:29 - BY

05:30 - THE CBO BECAUSE ANADARKO HAS BY

05:33 - SIMPLY ENTERING INTO A FEE

05:35 - SIMPLE THE TURNTABLE READ THE

05:37 - FEASIBLE ALL THE OIL.

05:39 - IT IS IN UNDER THE DESCRIBED

05:41 - PREMISES WITH RIGHTS OF INGRESS

05:43 - AND EGRESS

05:44 - FOR THE PURPOSES OF TRULY

05:45 - OPERATING OIL AND GAS WELLS IN

05:47 - RETURN FOR FUTURE ROYALTIES IF

05:49 - THEY DO SO. THE FIRST

05:51 - QUESTION THEN. MISTER

05:55 - COUSIN NOT. WITH IN WHICH WE'VE

05:59 - ALLOWED IT. I WOULD LIKE TO.

06:03 - I

06:03 - ASKED YOU. YES, THIS IS

06:05 - PROBABLY WHERE YOU HAVE AN

06:07 - OPPORTUNITY TO INTERFACE WITH

06:09 - THE COURT AND WE'D YES JUST TO

06:12 - SPARE.

06:16 - >>THANK YOU CHIEF JUSTICE JOB

06:17 - MR. KOSEN HOW THINK

06:19 - YOU HAVE CAN A PUT YOUR HANDS

06:22 - ON THE ALSO THE CASE.

06:25 - EVEN IN OUR COMPLEX SOCIETY.

06:28 - THERE ARE MANY FIRES THAT IN

06:31 - FACT CONTROL THE TRANSACTION.

06:34 - YEAH YOUR MEAT PACKING

06:36 - FACILITIES, DAIRY FARMERS.

06:38 - PERHAPS JOLLY GREEN IN

06:41 - VEGETABLES. I THOUGHT ABOUT THE

06:44 - FAIR TRADE

06:45 - COFFEE MOVEMENT BECAUSE OF THE

06:47 - EXPLOITATION OF COFFEE GROWERS,

06:48 - ALL KNOW

06:49 - CERTAINLY NOT UNITED STATES BUT

06:51 - GIVEN THE REALITY THAT.

06:54 - PURCHASER'S

06:55 - CONTROL TRANSACTIONS IN THE

06:56 - SAME WAY THAT THE LEGISLATURE

06:58 - SOUGHT

07:01 - CABIN SELLERS. WHY AS AN

07:04 - ATTORNEY.

07:05 - FALL THAT WITHIN LEGISLATIVE

07:07 - INTENT THAT THAT LAST CLAUSE

07:09 - HAVE 2, 1, 2,

07:12 - 3 WHICH SAYS INCLUDES ANY TREE.

07:15 - ANY TRADE THE WORD ANY I THINK

07:16 - IT'S MORE DESPISED IN AN

07:18 - FOR COMMERCE, DIRECTLY OR

07:20 - INDIRECTLY AFFECTED PEOPLE.

07:21 - THE COMMONWEALTH. I SAID THAT

07:24 - REGIONAL CONSTRUCTION.

07:25 - >>NO I IN SENTENCING GAUGING IN

07:27 - ANY OTHER FORTUNE OR DECEPTIVE

07:29 - CONDUCT. WHICH MEANS AS WE AS

07:32 - WE OUTLINED A PRIOR 20.

07:35 - BUT I THINK THE ANSWER TO YOUR

07:36 - QUESTION JUST A SPIRIT

07:37 - OF RESPECT IS IT THIS IS REALLY

07:39 - NOT AN ISSUE FOR THE COURTS.

07:40 - THIS IS AN ISSUE OR THE

07:41 - LEGISLATURE. THE LEGISLATURE IS

07:44 - TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT

07:46 - CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS AND

07:48 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS. WELL, 2

07:49 - OR NOT TO BE OR TOLL OF THE WAR

07:52 - IN CONGRESS BY THE A CONSUMER

07:54 - PROTECTION LAW IN THIS CASE.

07:57 - I GO BY THE TAX AND THE

07:59 - STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION OF THE

08:01 - TEXT AND THERE IS NO INDICATION

08:03 - ANYWHERE IN HERE. BAD.

08:06 - THESE THESE 40'S OR ANYTHING

08:10 - OTHER THAN SELLER

08:12 - AND BY THIS KIND OF THE

08:13 - TRANSACTION IS WELL DOCUMENTED

08:16 - AS LANDOWNERS ARE SELLERS THAT

08:19 - STUFF AS YOU KNOW MISTER

08:20 - COLUMBA MAY I INTERRUPT YOU

08:22 - BECAUSE MY TIME

08:23 - IS LIMITED AND I'M NOT SURE

08:25 - THAT YOU PUT YOUR FINGER ON

08:27 - WHAT I WANTED TO HEAR FROM YOU.

08:29 - >>LANGUAGE, I'M LOOKING AT AND

08:31 - I TRUST IT'S ACCURATE

08:32 - IS TO A 1, 2, 3 DEFINITION OF

08:35 - TRADE

08:35 - AND COMMERCE. IT'S THE CLAUSE

08:37 - AND INCLUDES ANY TRADE OR

08:39 - COMMERCE DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY

08:40 - AFFECTED PEOPLE THIS COM.

08:43 - YES, YES, YES, THEY WANT TO ASK

08:44 - YOU. MY QUESTION IS WHY DOESN'T

08:47 - THAT INCLUDES SELLERS MAKE THIS

08:48 - EASY.

08:49 - I'M SO TIRED, YOU WHY DOESN'T

08:51 - INCLUDE BUYERS. IT DOESN'T

08:53 - INCLUDE BUYERS BECAUSE YOU THE.

08:57 - THAT THAT'S THE MISSION TRADE

08:59 - AND COMMERCE. THESE

09:00 - UNITS ARE IT IS NOT SEPARATED

09:03 - INTO 2 DIFFERENT

09:04 - SETS OF IDEAS OR PHRASES.

09:07 - TRADE AND COMMERCE AND INCLUDES

09:10 - ANY TRADE OR COMMERCE MEANS.

09:12 - LIKE WHAT WE JUST SAID IN

09:15 - THE PRIOR. YES IN THE PRIOR

09:17 - LANGUAGE. ADVERTISING OFFERING

09:20 - FOR SALE, SALE OR DISTRIBUTION

09:22 - OF SERVICES. WELL AND ANY

09:24 - PROPERTY.

09:27 - DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY

09:28 - AFFECTING THE PEOPLE OF THE

09:29 - COMMONWEALTH IS A DESCRIPTION

09:31 - AS CHIEF JUSTICE. A SAILOR I

09:34 - THINK RECOGNIZED.

09:35 - >>IT IS IN THE

09:38 - MOST RECENT DECISION THAT HE

09:41 - WROTE.

09:44 - >>THAN GAME. NO WAY IS THE

09:46 - FINDING THEY PROTECTED CLASS.

09:49 - >>SO.

09:51 - >>WHEN WE SAY AND INCLUDE TRADE

09:53 - OR COMMERCE IT MEANS TRADE OR

09:55 - COMMERCE HAS HERETOFORE DEFINED

09:57 - IN THIS SENTENCE WHICH.

10:00 - FACTS DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY.

10:03 - THE PEOPLE OF THIS COME.

10:05 - SO IT'S ONE UNIT HURRY

10:07 - DEFINITION IN FACT THE RULES OF

10:09 - STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION. DICTATE

10:12 - THAT RESULT BECAUSE UNDER

10:15 - 1921.

10:18 - 1921.

10:19 - BIG THEY REFER TO BEING

10:21 - GOVERNED SOLELY BY THE TEXT AND

10:24 - NOT EXPANDING THE TEXT. BEYOND

10:26 - THAT WHICH THE LEGISLATURE

10:28 - DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE

10:31 - I HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR

10:32 - QUESTION TASTE GUYS AND I

10:33 - APPRECIATED CHIEF THANK YOU FOR

10:34 - THE TIME.

10:35 - >>THANK YOU GUYS GOT IT RIGHT.

10:38 - >>THANK YOU CHIEF

10:41 - MR KOSEN JUST

10:43 - TO SPARE, HOWEVER MY QUESTION

10:45 - THAT I HAD ABOUT THE INTER

10:46 - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE 2.

10:49 - THE MISSIONS AND I THINK YOU

10:50 - SAW ANSWER THAT VERY WELL I

10:53 - JUST HAVE ONE ADDITIONAL

10:55 - QUESTION AND IT'S ABOUT WERE

10:58 - HURT OR A STATION IN

11:00 - YOUR HURRY. OUR COURT HAS NEVER

11:03 - IT'S TRUE. IT'S

11:05 - NOW IN THAN THAT HOW IS

11:09 - IT NOT THE MAJORITY. BOTH

11:11 - WERE STUDENTS

11:14 - I'M ASKING THAT MAY BE

11:15 - TRUE THAT IS IT'S NOW BEEN

11:18 - STIRRED AND OTHER ALLIES HAVE

11:20 - NEVER HAD.

11:23 - LATE WITH THE SURFACE TO

11:26 - ADDRESS TO FLEE.

11:27 - >>NO NOT REALLY I THINK I THINK

11:30 - THAT THAT THIS IS A CASE OF

11:31 - FIRST IMPRESSION AND SO I THINK

11:34 - YOU CAN GO BACK TO THE

11:35 - MONUMENTAL PROPERTY. YOU CAN GO

11:37 - BACK HOME.

11:39 - >>I WANT TO ALSO MAKE THE CHIEF

11:40 - JUSTICE'S OPINION WHICH

11:42 - EVERYBODY HEARD WELL IT IN IT

11:44 - AND MORE RECENTLY.

11:47 - BUT THOSE CASES CLEARLY

11:51 - STATE BUT THEIR BASIC PREMISE

11:53 - OF PRANK. IT WAS.

11:55 - WELL THE CPL AND THIS YEAR'S

11:57 - UNITED SURETY THE CBO'S WAS IT

12:00 - CAN TO CONSUMER PROTECTIONS,

12:03 - COOL. NOW WE CAN

12:05 - ALWAYS ARGUE ABOUT WHETHER OR

12:07 - NOT.

12:09 - JUSTICE ROBERTS SHOULD HAVE OR

12:11 - SHOULD NOT HURT. THIS I DO.

12:14 - THE RENTAL PROPERTY. QUESTION

12:17 - WEATHER. LET'S SEIZE UPON HIS

12:19 - PROPERTY WERE IN THE SAME

12:20 - POSITIONS, CONSUMERS

12:22 - AND THE LESS WORDS OF RENTAL

12:23 - PROPERTY WHERE THE SAME

12:24 - POSITION AS SELLERS. AND

12:27 - I THINK THE ANSWER IS HE GOING

12:30 - TO PLAY WHERE THE NAVY HAS A

12:32 - STRICT CONSTRUCTION IS I THINK

12:35 - THE COURT SHOULD NOT TAKING THE

12:36 - CASE. IT SHOULD BE LEFT TO THE

12:38 - LEGISLATURE. BUT I HAVE

12:40 - NO ORGANIZATION. THE ANALYSIS

12:42 - BUT I DO IN POINT OUT ONE THING

12:44 - THIS IS IMPORTANT.

12:47 - JUSTICE ROBERTS BE HOOKED

12:50 - OR RESPECT BEFORE WHOM I

12:52 - APPEARED SEVERAL TIMES.

12:54 - HAD JUST AS

12:56 - YOUR LOVERS. I DOT THE WE HAD

12:59 - TO PUT A SHUNT OBEY. HOW MANY

13:01 - MORE AS TO WHAT THE AND

13:04 - INCLUDES LIVES WITH ME.

13:06 - HE WOULD HAVE NEVER HAD TO GO

13:08 - THROUGH ALL OF THE PAINSTAKING

13:10 - ANALYSIS THAT HE WENT THROUGH

13:12 - IN ORDER TO DETERMINE

13:14 - WHO WORKED WHO WAS THE CELERY

13:15 - WHO WAS A CONSUMER BECAUSE

13:18 - UNDER

13:18 - THEIR INTERPRETATION. THE

13:21 - LANGUAGE AND INCLUDING

13:22 - THEREAFTER, MAKES ME EVEN LESS

13:25 - EVERYTHING THAT YOU SAID BEFORE

13:27 - IN THIS IN THIS DEFINITION AND

13:29 - MAKES IT SUPER FULLEST SO WHY

13:31 - GO THROUGH THIS REALLY

13:34 - PAINSTAKING ANALYSIS AND HE

13:36 - WENT THROUGH TO JUSTIFY

13:38 - HOLDING. IT GIVES. MY

13:41 - PROPERTIES HAS TO SAY. IS THIS

13:44 - SUMMER TRANSACTIONS

13:45 - AND IT IT GIVES THE WHOLE BIG

13:47 - PAYOFF. THE COMO

13:50 - WATCH DECISION AND THE ATTORNEY

13:52 - GENERAL'S ARGUMENT THAT THE

13:54 - WORDS AND THE BLUES IS A

13:57 - TOTALLY SEPARATE AND DISTINCT

13:58 - DEFINITION

14:00 - THAT BRINGS ALL KINDS OF MOSUL

14:02 - TRANSACTIONS. UNDER THE OLD.

14:05 - UNDER THE AEGIS OF OF THE

14:08 - ATTORNEY GENERAL AND WILL THAT

14:10 - NOT THEY DIDN'T KNOW.

14:13 - WE WHEN YOU ULTIMATELY GET TO

14:15 - THE ANTI-TRUST QUESTION.

14:17 - CAN YOU JUST IMAGINE. IT WAS

14:20 - THE INTENTION OF THE

14:20 - LEGISLATURE. 100 TO ONE BATCH

14:24 - MORE.

14:25 - TO GET DISTRICT ATTORNEYS

14:27 - AROUND THE STATE. FOR

14:28 - EVERY COUNTY. THE RIGHT TO

14:30 - ENFORCE ANY TRUST MOST.

14:34 - I CAN SENSE WIND. THANK YOU SO

14:37 - THANK YOU JUSTICE TANI A.

14:39 - >>THANK YOU

14:40 - G MORNING.

14:41 - >>I AM WILLING TO DO WHAT I

14:44 - WANT TO FOLLOW UP BY MAY BE IN

14:46 - THE SAME THOUGHT PROCESS THAT

14:47 - JUST THIS AIR YEAH. I AND ON

14:51 - I'M I'M THE

14:52 - THINKING OF THE TERMS BUYER IN

14:54 - SELLER IN THE CLIMB CAPS AND

14:56 - THIS TRANSACTION AND THE

14:59 - ECONOMIC REALITY THAT SAID PLAY

15:01 - HERE. AND SO I'M

15:03 - JUST WONDERING ON IF INDEED WE

15:06 - NEED

15:07 - TO SHOEHORN I THIS TRANSACTION

15:10 - INTO THE CLIMB SECOND BUYER AND

15:12 - SELLER. WHY ISN'T.

15:15 - IN KEEPING WITH THE ECONOMIC

15:17 - REALITY HERE AND GAS EXTRACTORS

15:21 - ARE ACTUALLY SELLING

15:23 - THEIR SERVICES AND YES,

15:26 - IT'S TRACTORS.

15:27 - 2 INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE ON YOU

15:31 - KNOW LOOKING FOR AND

15:32 - THE ABILITY TO ON I HAVE HERE I

15:37 - GUESS TO TRACK IT.

15:38 - I MEAN ASSUMING FOR THE SAKE

15:41 - OF DISCUSSION THAT WE ARE

15:43 - INDEED DEALING WITH AN OPEN

15:45 - MARKET IN ALL OF

15:46 - THESE TERRITORIES WHERE OWNERS

15:49 - OF GAS RIGHTS

15:51 - CAN ACTUALLY LOOK FOR THE BEST

15:54 - DEAL IN THE END THIS

15:56 - EYE ON WHO I THEY WANT TO

15:58 - CHOOSE TO EXTRACT THE GAS.

16:01 - WHY ISN'T IT THAT COMPANIES

16:03 - LIKE YOURS THAT

16:04 - YOU'RE REPRESENTING SHOULDN'T

16:06 - BE VIEWED AS SELLERS I GUESS

16:09 - IT'S TRACKING SERVICES WHICH

16:11 - SPENCE

16:11 - SQUARELY WITHIN THE CLIMB THE

16:15 - STATUTE THAT AND YOU WOULD BE

16:17 - INTERPRETED.

16:18 - >>3, 3, ANSWERS ONE. BOTH THIS

16:22 - THOUGH LANGUAGE OF THE STATUTE.

16:24 - I DON'T THINK THE SLATE OF

16:25 - HISTORY, THE ON THE LANGUAGE OF

16:26 - THE STATUTE. THERE'S NOT DO

16:28 - YOU SUPPORT THAT KIND

16:30 - OF ANALYSIS.

16:32 - >>NUMBER 2 BEFORE YOU MOVE ON.

16:36 - WHY IS IT I MEAN IF WHAT WE'RE

16:38 - LOOKING AT IS

16:39 - BUYERS AND SELLERS WHY ARE THEY

16:41 - ARE EYEING SELLERS OF EXCEPTION

16:43 - FOR BECAUSE BECAUSE BECAUSE

16:45 - THAT'S NOT THE NATURE OF THE OF

16:46 - THE STRUCTURE OF THE FIELD

16:48 - NUMBER ONE AND NUMBER 2,

16:50 - BECAUSE THIS IS NOT A CONSUMER

16:52 - TRANSACTION.

16:53 - >>AND NUMBER 3. IF YOU LOOK

16:57 - IF YOU LOOK AT THE CASES BUT

16:59 - DEAL WITH THE DETAILS AROUND

17:00 - THE COUNTRY. THEY WILL ALL SAY,

17:03 - BUT OIL AND

17:05 - GAS LEASE IS THE CELL AND SALE

17:07 - OF THE TERMINAL. THE

17:08 - SIMPLE INTEREST. AS YOU LOOK AT

17:10 - THE CONTRACTS. WELL JUST AS

17:13 - FOG. MY CASE SCHOOL CHEN WHERE

17:15 - SHE WROTE THE OPINION AND TO DO

17:17 - IT I STOPPED BY D A AND THEY

17:19 - WERE AGAINST.

17:21 - CONTEXT THE CONTRACT MADE IT

17:23 - CLEAR THAT NOTHING WAS BEING

17:26 - SOLD. THERE WAS A PURCHASE OF

17:30 - THE RIGHTS. NOW. IF YOU FOLLOW

17:33 - YOU ARE QUESTION TO ITS LOGICAL

17:36 - EXTREME. THEN WHAT YOU HAVE IS

17:39 - YOU'RE TELLING ME IF I'M

17:41 - INVOLVED IN A BUSINESS

17:42 - TRANSACTION WHERE MY CLIENT IS

17:45 - SELLING ITS BUSINESS TO MISTER

17:48 - B. AND MISTER B ONCE UP

17:50 - A CONSIDERATION. CASH.

17:54 - AND FUTURE I CAN ASSURE A

17:56 - FUTURE PROFITS. BUT MISTER BIG

17:59 - IS ACTUALLY SELLING THE FUTURE

18:01 - PROFITS TO MY CLIENT AND HIS

18:04 - ATTORNEYS GENERAL CAN

18:05 - INTERFERE, BUT FOR PRIVATE

18:07 - PARTY TRANSACTION IN THE SALE

18:09 - OF ABYSS I THINK THAT'S ABSURD.

18:12 - QUITE FRANKLY. I SEE ABSOLUTELY

18:14 - NO SUPPORT FOR THAT. EITHER IN

18:16 - THE LANGUAGE ITSELF OR

18:17 - LEGISLATIVE HISTORY.

18:19 - >>I THANK YOU MISTER BROWN.

18:21 - MISTER AND WITH THAT WE'RE

18:25 - GOING TO. TURN

18:29 - EARNING MEYER.

18:34 - >>YEAH GOOD MORNING

18:35 - CHIEF JUSTICE AND AND TRY AND

18:38 - PRESENT. CHESAPEAKE. THIS IS A

18:41 - TEST CASE.

18:43 - TEST IS WHETHER THE CONSUMER

18:45 - PROTECTION LAW IS

18:46 - SO EXPANSIVE AND IT CAN BE AN

18:48 - OLD BY THE COMMONWEALTH

18:51 - TO BE IN

18:52 - THE 70'S AND TO SEEK RELIEVED

18:56 - AND WE HAVE A SELLERS, NOT

18:58 - CONSUMERS.

19:00 - IN A 200 BRANDS ARE IN THE 300

19:03 - PARAGRAPH K PLAN. THE

19:05 - WORD CONSUMER PIERS

19:08 - WINDS AND THAT IS IN THE NAME

19:11 - OF THE STATUTE.

19:13 - FOR OVER 50 YEARS THIS SCORED

19:15 - IN EVERY OTHER COULDN'T COME

19:16 - LOOK AT THIS LOOK AT THE

19:17 - STATUTE AND HAS INTERPRETED HAS

19:20 - CONCLUDED THAT ITS OBJECT AND

19:22 - ITS PURPOSE. IT'S TO PROTECT.

19:24 - CONSUMERS.

19:26 - FROM 1974 19 MENTAL PROPERTIES

19:29 - TO THE RECENT DECISION IN

19:30 - GOLDEN GATE. THIS COURT JUST

19:32 - NEEDED THE PURPOSE OF THE

19:34 - STATUE IS IT EVEN THE PARTY IN

19:37 - POWER BETWEEN CONSUMERS

19:39 - AND SELLERS. SO THEY'RE ON

19:41 - EQUAL FOOTING.

19:44 - THIS IS NOT THEIR CONTENT.

19:48 - ALSO WE BUY.

19:51 - IN THIS STATUTE

19:52 - WILL BECOME A GENERAL

19:54 - ALL-PURPOSE BUSINESS REGULATION

19:56 - STATUTE. IT CAN BE INVOKED BY

19:58 - ANY DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERNIE OR

20:01 - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. THIS CASE

20:03 - IS CONTROLLED BY THE PLAIN TEXT

20:04 - OF

20:04 - THE STATUTE. IN EVERY RESPECT

20:07 - THE STATUTE SUPPORTS ONLY

20:09 - ONE CONCLUSION AND THAT IS THAT

20:11 - CHECKED WAS TO

20:12 - PROTECT CONSUMERS. THE ATTORNEY

20:14 - GENERAL'S KINDER MORGAN IS

20:16 - BESIDE MISTREATED AND CANDIDLY

20:18 - AND ABSURD READING THE

20:20 - DEFINITION OF

20:20 - TREATING COMMERCE AND ALSO OVER

20:23 - READING IN THIS CASE THIS

20:25 - COURT'S DECISION AND AND AND

20:27 - AND THE

20:27 - ANTITRUST BRIEFLY. THE CONSUMER

20:30 - PROTECTION LAW PROTECTS

20:32 - CONSUMERS. NOT MARKETS.

20:35 - NOWHERE IN THE STATUTE DOESN'T

20:36 - EVEN REFERENCED ANTITRUST

20:38 - CONCEPTS SUCH AS RESTRAINT A

20:40 - TREE, NOT THE LEAST 6 JOINT

20:42 - VENTURES OR ANY OTHER CONCEPT.

20:46 - IT IS ALSO CRITICAL

20:47 - TO NOTE THAT THE STATUTE DOES

20:48 - NOT EXPRESSLY INCORPORATED ANY

20:51 - ANTITRUST STATUE AND THAT

20:53 - DISTINGUISHES IT FROM THE

20:54 - FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT

20:56 - EXPRESSWAY INCORPORATES THE

20:58 - SHERMAN ACT.

20:59 - WE NEED 100 COMMISSION LOOKED

21:01 - AT THE ATTORNEY

21:02 - GENERAL'S LAWMAKING AND HIS

21:03 - ATTEMPT TO DECIDE SALE

21:05 - TO BUY AND IS INTENDED TO ADD

21:08 - 10 NEW MARKET PRACTICES THAT

21:10 - WOULD BE PUT ME ON THAT YET ANY

21:12 - KIND OF REVIEW COMMISSION SAID

21:13 - THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WAS

21:15 - EXCEEDING HIS AUTHORITY INSURED

21:17 - THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY'S INTEND

21:20 - WAS AND IS CLEAR. THE STATUTE

21:22 - PROTECTS CONSUMERS AND

21:24 - LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION. DOES NOT

21:26 - CHANGE THAT FUNDAMENTAL.

21:28 - I CHECKED THE STATUE. I LOOK

21:30 - FORWARD TO YOUR QUESTIONS THANK

21:32 - YOU.

21:32 - >>THANK YOU MISTER BURGESS

21:34 - DAUGHERTY.

21:36 - I WOULD MAKE HIM FOLLOW THIS IS

21:37 - WHAT JUSTICE MONDAY

21:38 - SAID WHY NOT THE CONDUCT OF

21:41 - YOUR CLIENT BECAUSE IT IS

21:42 - SELLING OIL AND GAS EXTRACTION.

21:46 - >>IN A

21:46 - FEDERAL QUESTION.

21:47 - >>AND YOU JUST HAPPY THE REASON

21:49 - FOR THAT IS SIMPLE FALL.

21:51 - FIRST. WHEN THE TRANSACTION

21:53 - OCCURS.

21:55 - THE INDEPENDENTS ARE NOT UNDER

21:57 - ANY OBLIGATION TO DEVELOP THE

21:59 - PROPERTY. WHEN THE LEASE

22:01 - IS SIGNED. THE FINAL

22:03 - BLOW GOES FROM THE PELOTON

22:06 - TO THE CONSIDER THE UP HER TO

22:08 - THE SELLER.

22:10 - AND THEY HAVE PAID UPFRONT

22:12 - WE'LL T.

22:13 - THAT KIDS NEED POUNDS THE

22:14 - OPPORTUNITY BUT NOT THE

22:16 - OBLIGATION. AND DEVELOP THE

22:19 - MINERAL RIGHTS. IF THEY

22:20 - DON'T DEVELOP THE MINERAL

22:21 - RIGHTS TO KNOW RIGHT WE ARE

22:23 - BACK TO THE SELLER.

22:26 - SO IT IS NOT THIS IS NOT A

22:27 - CONTRACT FOR THE SALE

22:28 - DISTRIBUTION SERVICES. YES, YOU

22:31 - SHOULD SERVICES BECAUSE WE ARE

22:32 - UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO DEVELOP

22:34 - A GUESS THE ONLY THING THAT

22:35 - HAPPENS WHEN THE LEASE IS

22:36 - SIGNED IS A FRONT PAYMENT

22:39 - IS MADE. AND THAT'S SOMETHING

22:40 - THAT IS FOR THE POTENTIAL TO

22:42 - DEVELOP TO GUESS AND MANY MANY

22:44 - MANY LEASES ARE NOT DEVELOPED.

22:47 - SO THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION

22:48 - SECT.

22:51 - >>THOUGH IT THAT'S ANALOGOUS TO

22:52 - A PORN SHOP AND CORRECT.

22:56 - IN WHAT HAS BEEN A CUSTOMER

22:59 - WOULD BE THE STORE OWNER.

23:00 - AND THE SELLER WOULD BE

23:01 - TRADITIONALLY REGARDED AS THE

23:03 - CUSTOMER.

23:06 - >>IT'S ALL IN YOUR

23:07 - EXAMPLE SIRTE. THE STORE OWNER.

23:14 - >>HAS THE OPPORTUNITY

23:16 - TO PURCHASE

23:17 - SOMETHING FROM THE PERSON

23:19 - COMING IN SEEKING TO GET VALUE

23:21 - FOR IT.

23:23 - STORE OWNER IS A.

23:26 - JUST SHARE IN THAT INSTANCE.

23:31 - >>AND THE SELLER AND THE SELLER

23:33 - IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION.

23:35 - >>YOU CAN FOR THE ARTICLE FOR

23:37 - ANY VALUE IF IT DOESN'T LIKE

23:39 - THE VALUE OF THE STORE OWNER IS

23:40 - OFFERING. THE SELLING. IT IS

23:43 - NO OBLIGATION TO ENTER INTO A

23:46 - TRANSACTION JUST LIKE

23:47 - LANDOWNERS HERE THEY

23:48 - WERE IN THEY'RE UNDER NO

23:49 - OBLIGATION TO ENGAGE IN A

23:51 - TRANSACTION WITH 2 COUNTS.

23:54 - >>THEY ARE NOW.

24:00 - >>THANK US THIS MORNING

24:01 - COUNCIL. WE ARE

24:04 - YOU POINT OUT AND YOU AND

24:05 - MISTER PRESIDENT BOTH POINT OUT

24:07 - THAT E.

24:09 - GENERAL ASSEMBLY DID NOT PASS

24:11 - THE ANTI-TRUST STATUE.

24:14 - >>IS THAT EXCLUDE THE

24:15 - POSSIBILITY THAT CPL. COULD

24:19 - ALLOW FOR CLAIMS.

24:22 - SOUNDING ENOUGH. ANTI

24:24 - COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR RELATING

24:26 - TO CONSUMER CONFUSION IN OTHER

24:28 - WORDS.

24:31 - >>NOT A TRIUMPH FOR 8 MONTHS

24:32 - NOT NOT ANTITRUST WRIT LARGE

24:35 - BUT.

24:36 - SOME TYPES OF ANTI

24:38 - COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR OR FOR

24:40 - HUMAN RESET FAR AS TO SAY THAT

24:42 - UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES CAN

24:44 - THE STATUTE

24:45 - REACH THOSE. IT DOES YOUR HONOR

24:48 - BECAUSE THE CONSUMER PROTECTION

24:50 - STATUTE AND THE GENERAL

24:51 - ASSEMBLY'S INTENT IN AN ACTING.

24:53 - >>WAS NOT

24:54 - TO REACH ANY CONDUCT THAT WOULD

24:57 - AFFECT COMPETITION

24:58 - FOR MARKETS. THE STATUE IS

25:00 - BEREFT OF ANY STANDARD THE

25:03 - TRIAL COURT WOULD APPLY IN THE

25:05 - FUTURE TO DECIDE WHETHER THE

25:07 - ALLEGED CONDUCT. WHAT SEEMS

25:09 - ACTIONABLE UNDER ONE OF THE 21

25:11 - SOME FLAWS AND THIS STATUE.

25:13 - SO FOR EXAMPLE IN

25:14 - THIS CASE. THERE'S AN ALLEGED

25:16 - JOINT VENTURE BETWEEN GET

25:18 - COMMENTS.

25:19 - AND IT'S NOTEWORTHY THAT THAT'S

25:21 - THE ONLY ISSUE

25:23 - IT'S NOT AND THAT'S NOT BEFORE

25:25 - THE COURT AND THAT IS THE

25:26 - COMMONWEALTH COURT FOUND.

25:28 - THE JOINT VENTURE IS NOT PER SE

25:30 - A LAWFUL. SO HERE WHAT HE WOULD

25:32 - HAVE IT IS THE REMAINING COUNT

25:35 - AND COUNT 4.

25:36 - THIS SEEMS TO MAKE ACTIONABLE

25:38 - THE FAILURE TO DISCLOSE THE

25:40 - JOINT VENTURE THAT WAS NOT IN

25:42 - FACT UNLAWFUL. SO

25:44 - THE THE ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION

25:46 - IS YES, THIS IS NOT A.

25:48 - ANTITRUST STATUTE AND IF THE

25:50 - GENERAL ASSEMBLY WANTS TO ENACT

25:52 - AN ANTITRUST STATUTE HAS THAT

25:53 - OPPORTUNITY IS 26 TIMES IT'S

25:55 - CONSIDERED IT AND DECIDED NOT

25:57 - TO AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

26:00 - CANNOT CONVERT THIS CONSUMER

26:01 - PROTECTION STATUTE INTO A

26:03 - GENERAL BUSINESS ANTITRUST.

26:06 - THANK YOU.

26:07 - >>I GOT MONDAY. I HAVE NO

26:10 - QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME, THANK

26:12 - YOU.

26:19 - WE NOW HAVE THE ISSUE OF TIME

26:21 - REMAINING SO I JUST ISSA AND

26:25 - THERE YOU HAVE ANY QUESTION YOU

26:26 - THAT MR. OR.

26:34 - >>JUST DESPAIR YOU'RE ON YOU.

26:39 - YOU

26:39 - HEAR ME.

26:40 - YES.

26:41 - >>I APOLOGIZE. I WAS TOLD MY

26:43 - PAPER RATTLING WAS HACKED SO

26:46 - THANK YOU JUSTICE ON IT.

26:47 - MISTER BRIER THE ME IN MAKING

26:50 - YOUR OPENING PRESENTATION THAT

26:52 - I DISCERN AN ATTEMPT TO

26:53 - DISTINGUISH BETWEEN A SELLER

26:56 - AND A CONSUMER UNDER THE

26:57 - STATUTE.

26:59 - >>YES AND.

27:00 - >>WELL AVERAGE ON THAT.

27:02 - >>YEAH AND SOON CONSUMERS

27:04 - ARE PURCHASERS. CONSUMERS ARE

27:06 - PERSONS WHO ARE ENGAGED IN

27:08 - TRANSACTIONS WITH THE CONTAIN

27:10 - VALUE. HE WAS ALERT. THE

27:12 - SELLERS ARE OR NOT.

27:15 - THE SOONERS.

27:16 - >>LET ME LET ME I I UNDERSTAND

27:18 - OUT ON MISSIONS BEFORE LET ME

27:19 - ASK A DIFFERENT QUESTION.

27:21 - MY MY SCANT TIME AGAIN IN YOUR

27:23 - OPENING YOU DISCUSSED THE

27:26 - UNDERLYING LEGISLATIVE INTENT

27:28 - WAS TO EQUALIZE THE BALANCE

27:31 - OF POWER BETWEEN

27:34 - A SELLER.

27:36 - >>AMERICANS IN A CONSUMER.

27:40 - >>THAT IT IN NO WE DISCUSS THIS

27:42 - A LITTLE BIT WITH IF JOHN MR.

27:44 - KOSEN.

27:46 - >>IT IN THE REAL WORLD WHERE.

27:50 - >>AYERS SAID SHE'S

27:51 - YOUR CLIENT REALLY HOLD ALL THE

27:54 - ECONOMICS WAY LET'S GET TO THIS

27:56 - MALL OWNERS. I PARTICULARLY

27:58 - GIVEN YOUR JOINT VENTURE

28:00 - WHICH SCHOOLS REGARDLESS OF

28:01 - WHAT IT WAS ACTIONABLE OR NOT

28:03 - WAS

28:03 - ANTI COMPETITIVE, DOESN'T IT

28:05 - MAKE SENSE THAT THE LEGISLATURE

28:07 - OF INTENT. IF YOU READ

28:09 - THE STATUTE WOULD BE TO GIVE

28:11 - SOME PROTECTION TO SELLERS

28:15 - WHO ARE.

28:16 - >>IN THE

28:17 - D E.

28:19 - >>UPON PARTY IN THESE

28:20 - TRANSACTIONS.

28:22 - >>RESPECTFULLY

28:22 - JUSTICE SPIRIT DOESN'T AND I

28:24 - WANT TO POINT OUT SOMETHING

28:25 - THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT IN THE

28:26 - SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN

28:28 - THIS ISN'T THE REPRODUCED

28:29 - RECORDED PAGES TO 1009 1010.

28:34 - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN FACT

28:36 - ALLEGES THEN MANY LANDOWNERS

28:38 - NEGOTIATED QUOTE UNQUOTE

28:40 - HARD BARGAINS. NOW TELL ITS

28:43 - REVISED LEASE TERMS BASED ON

28:45 - INSISTING. DEMANDS MOST OF THE

28:48 - LANDOWNERS AND

28:50 - IN FACT THE REALITY IS TO

28:53 - LANDOWNERS CONSIST OF ALL KINDS

28:55 - OF PEOPLE

28:56 - THERE ARE VERY SIGNIFICANT

28:58 - CORPORATE ENTITIES THAT OWN

28:59 - SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS

29:00 - OF LAND. LATER THEY GOT

29:02 - TOGETHER AND POINT GROUPS AND

29:04 - HIRED LAWYERS. SO THE NARRATIVE

29:06 - THAT HAS EVOLVED THAT THIS IS

29:07 - SOME RELATIONSHIP

29:09 - THAT IS DISPARATE IS NOT

29:12 - SUPPORTED BY THE SECOND AMENDED

29:13 - COMPLAINT WHICH TROOPS WHICH

29:14 - ALLEGES THAT THE LANDOWNERS IN

29:16 - FACT IN DEMAND AND INSISTED ON

29:19 - TERMS AND THE REALITY IN

29:21 - THE MARKET. AND SECONDLY IT'S

29:23 - IT'S NOT SUPPORTED BECAUSE

29:25 - THAT'S AND THAT'S A DECISION

29:26 - FOR THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

29:27 - SURFACE THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY'S

29:30 - DEFINITION OF TRADE

29:31 - AND COMMERCE. IT'S FOCUSED ON

29:33 - CONDUCT THAT SELLERS

29:34 - ENGAGE IN. IF YOU WANTED TO

29:37 - WRITE A STATUE TO PROTECTED.

29:39 - THE MORE. THE PARTY THAT DIDN'T

29:41 - HAVE AS MUCH

29:42 - BARGAINING POWER. IT COULD HAVE

29:44 - ENDED VERY DIFFERENTLY TO SAY

29:46 - TRAINING CAMP, THIS MEANS ANY

29:47 - TRANSACTION THE TRANSFER OF

29:49 - MONEY AND THAT WOULD BE LOOKING

29:51 - AT IN EVERY INSTANCE WHO HAD

29:53 - THE PARTY IN POWER

29:55 - SO IT'S NOT SUPPORTED BY THE

29:56 - SECOND MAN TO COMPLAIN, IT'S

29:58 - NOT SUPPORTED BY PLANE TURN

30:00 - COMMERCE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU

30:02 - JUSTICE TIED.

30:04 - >>YES, THANK YOU CHIEF JUSTICE.

30:06 - MISTER

30:07 - PRYOR IN A LOT TO A LINE OF

30:10 - QUESTIONING THAT JUSTICE TANI

30:12 - HE PURSUED IT'S JUST THEY'RE

30:15 - FOLLOWING UP ON AS WELL.

30:17 - IN ORDER FOR US. IN CONSTRUE

30:20 - ING THE STATUTE.

30:22 - 2 IN REGARD TO THE

30:25 - ECONOMIC REALITY WHAT'S REALLY

30:27 - GOING ON OUT HERE

30:29 - IN IN SOME OF YOU.

30:33 - DON'T WE NEED TO GO BEYOND THE

30:35 - PLAIN LANGUAGE OF

30:36 - THE STEP TO AND I DOVE INTO

30:39 - SYRIA.

30:41 - >>YOUR

30:41 - HONOR THIS. WE MUCH CASE LAW

30:44 - THAT SAYS THE COURT

30:45 - SHOULD NOT IN NORTHERN PLAIN

30:47 - TEXT OF THE STATUTE TO PURSUE

30:49 - ITS SPIRIT. THIS STATUTE IS

30:52 - CLEAR IS INTENDED TO

30:55 - PROTECT CONSUMERS. THE FACT

30:57 - THAT THIS IS A CASE OF FIRST

30:58 - IMPRESSION INVOLVING

30:59 - GAS LEASES DOESN'T CHANGE THE

31:01 - METAL OBJECT THE STATUTE IS TO

31:03 - PROTECT CONSUMERS IN

31:04 - THE COMMONWEALTH HAS SAID ON

31:07 - THE RECORD AND HAS NEVER

31:08 - WAVERED FROM THIS.

31:09 - THIS IS A PAGE 2759 OF THE

31:11 - WRECKAGE. THE LANDOWNERS ARE

31:13 - SELLERS.

31:15 - THEY ARE NOT PURCHASES. I DON'T

31:17 - THINK

31:17 - YOU CAN ONLY ON THE PLAIN TEXT

31:19 - OF THE STATUTE, THE CONTROL

31:20 - THEY WANT TO MAKE ONE OF THE

31:21 - 3 POINT. THESE LANDOWNERS ARE

31:24 - NOT WITHOUT RELIEF.

31:26 - THERE IS A CLASS ACTION

31:27 - SETTLEMENT AND EASY FOR ME IN

31:29 - THE

31:29 - MIDDLE DISTRICT. BRIGHT LIGHT

31:31 - IS VERY PEOPLE THINK THIS

31:32 - COUNCIL THAT WAS A PRELIMINARY

31:34 - APPROVAL BY THE TRIAL COURT.

31:36 - SO THEY KNOW HOW TO GET AT

31:37 - LEAST IN THE U.S. IT'S SOON IN

31:39 - CONTRACT SAYING THAT OUR

31:41 - CLIENTS TO PALETTE IN ACTING

31:43 - UNDER THE CONTRACT.

31:45 - SO THIS COURT REVERSES AS THEY

31:47 - ARE DUE

31:47 - TO DO THE HEALTH OF THE

31:50 - LANDOWNERS ARE NOT WITHOUT WE

31:52 - THERE'S THERE IS BEFORE THE

31:53 - COURT A PRELIMINARY APPROACH 7.

31:55 - >>THANK

31:56 - YOU COUNT.

31:57 - >>MISTER BROWER WORK THAT COULD

31:59 - WORK IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SAY A

32:01 - WORD OR 2.

32:02 - AND BY WAY OF SUMMATION WILL

32:04 - THAT TURN TO THE COMMONWEALTH

32:06 - THAT FOLEY.

32:08 - >>THANK YOU CHIEF JUSTICE

32:08 - TAYLOR IN CLOSING I WANT TO

32:10 - THANK THE COURT FOR

32:11 - FACILITATING THIS VIDEO

32:12 - ARGUMENT DID SOMETHING THAT A

32:13 - CRITICALLY IMPORTANT ISSUE TO

32:15 - EVERYBODY.

32:16 - THE SECOND QUESTION

32:17 - INVOLVING IN A TRUST IS

32:19 - CONTROLLED BY THE FIRST

32:20 - QUESTION IF THIS COURT AGREES

32:22 - WITH ME THAT THE STATUE IS NOT

32:24 - INTENDED TO AND DOES NOT

32:25 - PROTECT SELLERS.

32:29 - THE ISSUE IS

32:30 - VERY SIMPLE. THE ATTORNEY

32:32 - GENERAL'S ONLY HAS THE

32:34 - AUTHORITY GRANTED TO HIM BY THE

32:36 - GENERAL ASSEMBLY HE HAD NO

32:37 - GENERAL

32:38 - POLICE SUMMARY. HE HAS NO

32:40 - NUMBER OF THE WRITINGS TO

32:42 - PURSUE WHAT HE BELIEVES TO BE

32:44 - ACTIONABLE AND LACI WAS AN

32:47 - ACCORD WITH THE STATUE ANY CAN

32:49 - ONLY PURSUE CLAIMS THAT THE

32:51 - CURRENT RATE IN COMMERCE AND

32:53 - HE'S DOWN. CALDWELL CONTENDS

32:55 - THAT THE TRIAL COURT JUDGE

32:56 - BROWN WAS VERY SKEPTICAL THAT

32:58 - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S EFFORT.

33:00 - THIS ONE IN CONSUMER PROTECTION

33:02 - STATUTES. HE SHOULDN'T TRUST

33:04 - IS SKEPTICISM. JUST JUDGE KOBE

33:08 - AND I THINK A BRILLIANT DESCENT

33:10 - GOT IT RIGHT. I RESPECTFULLY

33:13 - ASK THIS COURT TO REVERSE

33:16 - BECOME WELL COURT AND TO REMAIN

33:19 - IN THE MATTER

33:23 - TEXANS

33:24 - TO SAY. I AGAIN THANK YOU FOR

33:26 - YOUR TIME IS MUCH APPRECIATED

33:28 - THANK YOU BERKE THANK YOU

33:29 - MISTER COUSINS NOW OUT HERE FOR

33:31 - THAT.

33:36 - >>MAY IT PLEASE

33:37 - THE COURT. MY NAME IS OUR TOP

33:39 - COURT. I'M A SENIOR DEPUTY

33:41 - ATTORNEY GENERAL. I REPRESENT

33:43 - THE COMMONWEALTH. THE

33:45 - COMMONWEALTH MAINTAINS THAT

33:47 - CHESAPEAKE IN ANADARKO

33:49 - THE VIOLATED UNFAIR TRADE

33:51 - PRACTICES AND CONSUMER

33:53 - PROTECTION LAW IN 2 WAYS.

33:56 - FIRST, THEY HAVE ACTED

33:58 - DECEPTIVELY BY INDUCED

34:00 - LANDOWNERS TO ENTER INTO WILL

34:02 - AND GAS LEASES BUT THEN REDUCE

34:04 - THE AMOUNT OF

34:06 - ROYALTIES PROMISED HE'S BEEN

34:08 - MISREPRESENTED IT WAS

34:10 - PROTECTION. BUT WHOSE

34:11 - PRODUCTION COSTS. SECOND.

34:14 - THEY HAVE ACTED UNFAIRLY.

34:16 - ENTERING THE MARKET ALLOCATION

34:18 - AGREEMENT WHO WATCHED

34:19 - DIMINISHED COMPETITION AND

34:21 - THEREBY LOWERED THE MARKET

34:22 - RATE. THE BONUS PAYMENTS AND

34:25 - ROOKIE RATES.

34:27 - CHESAPEAKE ANY IN A DARK HIS

34:28 - DEFENSE TODAY IS NOT THAT THEY

34:30 - DIDN'T ENGAGE. THAT IS A TEASE.

34:33 - INSTEAD, THEY ARGUE THAT THEY

34:35 - CAN NOT BE LIABLE. UNDER THE

34:37 - LAW BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT ENGAGE

34:40 - IN TRADE IN COMMERCE. AND I'M

34:41 - NOT SO WEEKS GOODS OR SERVICES.

34:45 - DESPITE

34:46 - THEIR PROTESTS. THERE'S NO REAL

34:48 - DOUBT THIS SECURING LEASES THE

34:50 - PRODUCTION OF NATURAL GAS AS A

34:52 - BUSINESS ACTIVITY WHICH

34:54 - CONSTITUTES TRADE AND COMMERCE

34:56 - SECTION 2 OF THE LAW DEFINES

34:58 - THEY DIDN'T COMMERCE BROADLY

35:00 - RESTRICTING ITS JOB WOULD

35:02 - DIMINISH THE RATES.

35:03 - PENNSYLVANIANS IN A MANNER

35:05 - WHICH IS CONTRARY. THE GENERAL

35:07 - ASSEMBLY'S INTENT IN ENACTING

35:09 - THE LAW. CHESAPEAKE

35:13 - WELL ACTUALLY RESTS ON

35:14 - THEIR POSITION THAT ONLY

35:15 - SELLERS OF GOODS AND SERVICES

35:17 - THEY BE LIABLE UNDER THE LAW O

35:20 - WEATHER. THIS IS SIMPLY NOT

35:21 - TRUE SECTION 7, 9.2 PROVIDE FOR

35:25 - PRIVATE ACTIONS

35:27 - AGAIN SELLERS. THEY DO NOT

35:29 - IMPOSE GENERAL LIMITATIONS ON

35:31 - THE DEFINITION OF TRADE AND

35:32 - COMMERCE OTHER PARTS OF THE

35:34 - LAW. THIS IS A PUBLIC ACTION BY

35:38 - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL UNDER

35:39 - SECTION 4. HE'S UNDER

35:42 - SECTION 4 ARE NOT LINKED

35:44 - TO SELLERS AND MAY BE BROUGHT

35:46 - AGAINST ANY PERSON ENGAGED

35:48 - IN UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE TRADE

35:50 - PRACTICES. AS FOR THE

35:52 - SECOND ISSUE CHESAPEAKE

35:54 - IN ANADARKO MAINTAIN THAT ANY

35:57 - COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR. HE DID BY

35:59 - FEDERAL IN-STATE ANTI-TRUST LAW

36:02 - AND NOT BE THE BASIS OF A

36:04 - SEPARATE CAUSE OF ACTION UNDER

36:05 - THE LAW.

36:07 - HOWEVER THE COURT SHOULD LOOK

36:08 - TO WHETHER THERE IS A VIOLATION

36:10 - OF OF THE LAW BUT WHETHER

36:12 - SUCH VIOLATION WOULD ALSO

36:14 - CONSTITUTE AN ANTI-TRUST

36:16 - VIOLATIONS. IT IS THE COMMON

36:18 - WAS POSITION AND ACTIONS WHICH

36:20 - CONSTITUTE SEPARATE VIOLATIONS

36:22 - OF ANY TRUST LOW ARE ALSO

36:24 - ENCOMPASS BY AND MAY PROVIDE

36:26 - FOR BECAUSE OF ACTION UNDER THE

36:28 - UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES AND

36:30 - CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW.

36:32 - FOR THESE REASONS THE DECISION

36:34 - OF THE COMMONWEALTH COURT

36:36 - SHOULD BE AFFIRMED.

36:38 - THANK YOU JUSTICE TIME HERE.

36:42 - >>I CAN

36:43 - SO I'M GOING TO FOLLOW UP BY

36:44 - MY EYE EARLIER QUESTION ARE

36:47 - REGARDING THE ECONOMIC REALITY

36:49 - OF THIS TRANSACTION IN I'M

36:51 - LOOKING FOR REPRIEVE FROM

36:52 - SOMEONE THAT HE IS IN SURGERY.

36:55 - ANALYSIS SO LET ME ASK YOU

36:58 - WHY EYES THE

37:01 - ATTORNEY GENERAL NOT TAKEN

37:04 - THAT POSITION THAT THE

37:06 - ECONOMIC REALITY OF THIS

37:07 - TRANSACTION IS HAPPY GAS.

37:09 - IT'S TRACTORS ARE SELLING THEIR

37:12 - SERVICES AS GAS EXTRACTOR.

37:17 - >>THAT IS A THEORY

37:19 - WHICH WE HAVE THOUGHT OF BUT.

37:22 - WE HAVE OUR POSITION IS IF YOU

37:24 - LOOK AT THE MEANING OF TRADE

37:25 - AND COMMERCE THE DEFINITION

37:28 - UNDERSTAND THAT COUNCIL AND IF

37:29 - YOUR ANSWER IS.

37:31 - >>YOU'RE TRYING TO GET

37:32 - THE BROADEST POSSIBLE

37:34 - INTERPRETATION ON FROM THIS

37:36 - COURT.

37:38 - >>I HAS TO

37:39 - BE HOT. I SCOPE OF THIS APP AND

37:42 - TO ME THAT'S 9 O WE GETTING

37:44 - THAT RESPONSE. JUST FOR THE

37:47 - SAKE OF DISCUSSION.

37:48 - I BET WE CONCLUDE THAT THE

37:50 - PARAMETERS OF

37:51 - THE STAFF OUR STEPS FOR NEARLY

37:54 - CLEARLY IN TERMS OF THEIR

37:56 - PROTECTION WORRIED THEIR

37:57 - CONSUMER OR CONSUMERS AND.

38:00 - >>I THE DICHOTOMY BETWEEN

38:01 - BUYERS AND SELLERS. THE

38:03 - NECKLINE TAX.

38:06 - SHOULD WE LOOK TO

38:08 - THE ECONOMIC REALITY OF A

38:10 - TRANSACTION TO DETERMINE

38:12 - WHETHER

38:12 - OR NOT HERE FOR EXAMPLE, THERE

38:15 - IS IN FACT THE SALE OF SERVICES

38:18 - THAT THESE TAKING PLACE BY THE

38:20 - GAS SECTORS.

38:22 - I SINK.

38:24 - >>THE TRANSACTION COULD BE

38:25 - VIEWED THAT WAY I WOULD PUSH

38:27 - BACK A LITTLE BIT THAT THIS

38:30 - ACTION IS BROUGHT UNDER SECTION

38:32 - 4 IN THE

38:33 - PUBLIC INTEREST BY THE ATTORNEY

38:35 - GENERAL WHICH IS BROADER THEN

38:38 - SECTION 9.2. WARY SPECIFICALLY

38:41 - TALKS ABOUT SELLERS.

38:45 - >>THANK YOU JUSTICE DAUGHERTY.

38:52 - IT'S THE START OF THE YEAR AND

38:53 - YOU GET DOWN.

38:54 - THANK YOU, THANK YOU COUNCIL

38:56 - AND THE QUESTION WHY SAID

38:58 - THEY'RE A FAILED ATTEMPT AT

38:59 - LEAST 24 TIMES BY THE GENERAL

39:01 - STANLEY THE PASS AND THEN TRY

39:03 - IT.

39:03 - STATUTE SHOULD WE PERMIT YOU TO

39:06 - DO WITH THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

39:07 - HAS NOT INTEND TO PURSUE ITS

39:09 - STATUTORY INTERPRETATION.

39:11 - I AM EATING YOU EXPLAIN UNDER

39:15 - THE UNFAIR TRADE.

39:16 - >>SO OUR POSITION IS THAT

39:19 - THE LAW COVERS UNFAIR AND

39:22 - DECEPTIVE PRACTICES WHICH MAY

39:25 - OR MAY NOT ALSO FALL.

39:28 - INDEED TRUST CONTACTS YOU COULD

39:30 - ALSO. I

39:32 - ACTUALLY THAT THE GENERAL

39:34 - ASSEMBLY SO THE BROAD REACH OF

39:37 - THE CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW AND

39:39 - SAID.

39:40 - >>YOU DON'T NEED. AN ADDITIONAL

39:43 - ANY TRUST STATUE. IF

39:45 - THIS BEHAVIOR IS LARGELY

39:48 - COVERED BY THE CONSUMER

39:49 - PROTECTION LAW ANYWAY.

39:53 - I THINK THAT'S

39:54 - IS REASONABLE AN INTERPRETATION

39:56 - OF THE LEGISLATURE'S ACTIONS

39:58 - AND I THINK IT'S 8TH THIS

40:00 - BECAUSE THE LEGISLATURE

40:01 - DID NOT PASS THE NAVY CROSS LAW

40:03 - THAT THAT SOMEHOW LIMITS THE

40:05 - SCOPE OF THE CONSUMER

40:06 - PROTECTION.

40:10 - >>VENTURES IN IT APPEARS THAT

40:13 - YOU'RE BACK ON

40:13 - THIS MATTER AS THE 2 BUSINESSES

40:16 - OPERATING TOGETHER. WHAT'S

40:18 - WRONG WITH THAT.

40:22 - >>ONLY DOES THAT

40:23 - THE IF THE OWNERS WERE NOT

40:25 - INFORMED THAT THEY WERE.

40:28 - THE 2 COMPANIES WE'RE DIVIDING

40:30 - UP THE TERROR WORRY AND IF

40:32 - WE'RE ARTIFICIALLY LOWERING.

40:35 - THE PRICE WHICH MEANS THIS

40:36 - COULD GET. HERE LEASES FURTHER

40:39 - FOR THAT. WE'LL HAVE

40:41 - A STRETCH.

40:42 - >>IS THERE ANY MORE DECEPTIVE

40:44 - AND BUSINESSES HAVING SOME WAS

40:46 - FILLED WITH

40:46 - GARY'S AT AND THERE'S ONE MONEY

40:49 - IS GOING THROUGH THE PIPELINE

40:50 - TO OTHER BUSINESS.

40:53 - >>I'M SO I COULD HEAR THE LESS

40:54 - FOR YOUR QUESTION.

40:56 - >>THE QUESTION I HAD WAS

40:58 - SO IT IN THE FORM OF BUSINESS

41:00 - ITS SUBSIDIARY OF A BUSINESS TO

41:02 - DO BUSINESS READ AND SOMEHOW

41:04 - THE MONEY

41:05 - IS BEING SHARED BETWEEN

41:07 - DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT

41:09 - YOUR KNOWLEDGE OR AS

41:11 - THE CONSUMER IS THAT ALSO

41:13 - DECEPTIVE.

41:16 - >>I GUESS IT WOULD DEPEND ON

41:17 - THE FACTS IN THIS CASE WE'RE

41:19 - DEALING WITH THE SECOND AMENDED

41:21 - COMPLAINT. THE COMMONWEALTH

41:23 - AS ALLEGED THAT THE TACTICS

41:25 - WERE DECEPTIVE. IT'S NOT THE

41:28 - QUESTION BEFORE THE COURT.

41:29 - WHETHER THAT'S TRUE OR NOT.

41:31 - >>AND WHAT ONCE THE SEPT THAT

41:32 - WHAT ARE YOU SHARING THAT THEY

41:34 - BURN THE JOINT VENTURE WITHOUT

41:36 - DARING WITH THEIR. LANDA.

41:41 - >>YES, THAT'S THAT'S LARGELY

41:43 - IT.

41:45 - >>AND AGAIN I ASK YOU

41:47 - WHAT WAS DECEPTIVE ABOUT THAT

41:48 - JUST THE FACT THAT THEY DIDN'T

41:50 - SAY THAT THEY WERE IN A JOINT

41:51 - VENTURE.

41:53 - >>WELL THEY DID IN. THEY DIDN'T

41:55 - DISCLOSE THAT. THE LAND OWNERS

41:58 - MIGHT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GET A

41:59 - HIGHER PRICE AND THEN EXACTLY

42:00 - MORE. PETITION FOR WHAT THEY

42:03 - WERE WERE SOWN.

42:04 - >>BUT THAT THE INCOME THE BOND

42:06 - THE LANDOWNER TO RING

42:08 - WHY ARE AS TO THE BEARS WE KNOW

42:10 - THAT BURNED MORE THAN 2

42:11 - BUSINESSES. EXTRACTING

42:14 - MARCELLUS SHALE.

42:16 - >>SO IT'S IT'S OUR POSITION

42:18 - THAT IT VIOLATES THE CONSUMER

42:22 - PROTECTION LAW.

42:24 - IT'S A DECEPTIVE TRADE

42:25 - PRACTICE.

42:28 - >>YOU'RE NOT LYING PREMISES

42:29 - THAT THE LANDOWNER IS IGNORANT

42:31 - AS TO WHAT THEY'RE DOING WITH

42:32 - THEIR LAND.

42:37 - >>THEY WOULD BE IGNORANT NO

42:38 - MATTER HOW SOPHISTICATED THEY

42:40 - OR REGARDING THE

42:42 - CONTRACTUAL RELATION. SHIPS THE

42:44 - QUEEN CHESAPEAKE IN ECUADOR TO.

42:47 - >>WELL IF YOU'RE SAYING A

42:48 - CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP WHY

42:50 - WOULD IN THE REMEDY. THE BREACH

42:52 - OF CONTRACT AS OPPOSED TO NO

42:53 - UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICE FOR

42:55 - ANTITRUST.

42:59 - >>THE COMMONWEALTH BELIEVE THAT

43:00 - THIS WAS A WIDESPREAD

43:03 - PRACTICE AFFECTING THE PUBLIC.

43:05 - AND SO THE

43:06 - COMMONWEALTH'S REMEDY SOUZA

43:09 - CONSUMER

43:09 - PROTECTION LAW.

43:10 - >>THAT DOES NOT CARRY A GUN AND

43:11 - FINALLY HOW MANY LAND OWNERS.

43:13 - WE'RE FACT THAT WHEN YOU CALL

43:14 - THIS WIDESPREAD.

43:17 - IT'S INCUMBENT DON'T REMEMBER.

43:24 - MAYBE A DOCTOR THAT I CAN TELL

43:26 - YOU THAT. FOR NOW

43:27 - THANK YOU. THAT'S CORRECT.

43:30 - THANK YOU JUSTICE. MR. GOOD

43:32 - MORNING. MISTER OCCURRED.

43:35 - >>WOULD YOU AGREE WITH ME THAT

43:37 - THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY HAS THE

43:38 - POWER

43:40 - TO YOU TRADE IN COMMERCE

43:42 - WHATEVER DEFINITION IT CHOOSES

43:44 - AND IN FACT FOR EXAMPLE TO

43:45 - EXCLUDE. AYERS HAS US HERE.

43:49 - OR YOUR POSITION THAT NOAH

43:51 - WEBSTER GETS THE CALL.

43:54 - >>IT HAS THE POWER AND I DIDN'T

43:55 - HEAR THE LAST. WHERE THAT

43:57 - SECOND QUESTION.

43:59 - >>WE DON'T GO TO KNOW WEBSTER

44:00 - IF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY DEFINED

44:02 - IT RIGHT. YOU REALLY.

44:08 - I'M INTERESTED IN

44:09 - YOUR VIEW OF THE INTERACTION OF

44:10 - THE 2 CAUSES

44:11 - WITH IT. WHEN WE READ THIS

44:14 - DEFINITION OF TRADE AND

44:15 - COMMERCE.

44:17 - TO SAY THAT THE GENERAL

44:19 - ASSEMBLY WANTS US TO GIVE A

44:20 - DIFFERENT DEFINITION OF TRADE

44:23 - AND COMMERCE WHEN IT AFFECTS

44:24 - PENNSYLVANIANS. A 1000.

44:29 - I THINK IT'S A.

44:33 - IT'S

44:34 - A GENERAL.

44:39 - ENLARGEMENT OF

44:40 - THE MEANING OF THE FIRST IT WAS

44:43 - AND I THINK INDEED AN IN.

44:46 - THE FACT

44:47 - THAT THE PLAINTIFF WAS AN OUT

44:49 - OF STATE RESIDENTS. HERNDON 2.

44:53 - HOW YOU IT SLICED

44:55 - UTAH RECONSTRUCTION TO THE

44:57 - SECOND CAUSE.

44:59 - >>THAT IN DOES THAT MEAN MR.

45:00 - PARKER DOES THAT

45:03 - MEAN THAT IT'S A TAIL WAG THE

45:05 - DOG STUNT RATION WHERE

45:08 - SECOND CLAUSE IS THE GENERAL

45:10 - ASSEMBLY TELLING US OH NEVER

45:12 - MIND DISREGARD OR FIRST CLAUSE.

45:15 - IT'S JUST EVERYTHING.

45:18 - >>WELL I I DON'T KNOW THAT IT'S

45:20 - EVERYTHING BUT IT CERTAINLY.

45:22 - IT'S IF IT DOESN'T MEAN

45:23 - ANYTHING THEN WHY DID THE

45:26 - LEGISLATURE DO IT WITH THAT

45:28 - LANGUAGE AND ALSO I

45:30 - WOULD ALSO DOUBLE BUT I CAN SAY

45:32 - ARE AN INITIAL POSITION IS THAT

45:35 - THE FIRST WAS COVERS THIS THAT

45:37 - WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE SALE

45:39 - WHICH IS TRADE AND COMMERCE AND

45:42 - SO THAT'S A SPECIFIC ACTIVITY

45:44 - AND WHETHER SOME SELLER OR A

45:46 - BUYER. IT'S NOT WHERE ONCE YOU

45:48 - SAY. THIS IS TREATED IN

45:50 - COMMERCE.

45:54 - >>SO IS YOUR POSITION THEN THAT

45:55 - STATUTE IS AMBIGUOUS OR NOT IN

45:57 - BIG BUCKS.

46:01 - WELL I THINK.

46:04 - THE SECOND CLAUSE AS SOME

46:06 - IN BIG.

46:07 - >>BUT THEN GIVEN. IT

46:10 - WAS TRADITIONAL LIBERAL

46:12 - INTERPRETATION OF THAT ACT

46:14 - THAT'S LOW SHOULD BE

46:15 - INTERPRETED WHAT CONTENT.

46:19 - >>BUT WOULD YOU AGREE

46:20 - THAT YOU COULDN'T MAKE YOUR

46:22 - CASE TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

46:24 - RATHER THAN TO US.

46:29 - WE CERTAINLY.

46:31 - COULD MAKE THEIR CASE WE

46:33 - KNOW THING WE NEED TO BECAUSE

46:35 - WE THINK.

46:37 - THIS ACTIVITY QUALIFIES UNDER

46:38 - THE

46:39 - EXISTING LANGUAGE. LAST LAST

46:40 - QUESTION ON IT'S A FOLLOW-UP TO

46:42 - SOMETHING OPPOSING COUNSEL

46:45 - MENTIONED.

46:48 - WELL IF YOU

46:48 - PREVAIL HERE WHAT'S TO STOP

46:51 - DISTRICT ATTORNEYS AROUND THE

46:52 - COMMONWEALTH. FROM WIELDING

46:54 - THIS STATUTE IS A SWORD.

46:56 - IN ANY BUSINESS TRANSACTION ALL

47:00 - THAT ARE NOT FOND OF.

47:05 - IT'S

47:06 - JUST A AN ORDINARY BREACH OF

47:08 - CONTRACT. A SITUATION THAT

47:11 - DOESN'T NECESSARILY MAKE IT AND

47:14 - UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE TRIP.

47:16 - THIS THIS YOU CAN TRACK

47:18 - TO PRODUCE. 1000 WIDGETS FOR

47:21 - SOMEBODY. IF YOU FALL SHORT

47:24 - THAT DOESN'T I MEAN IF YOU WERE

47:26 - TO SEPT IS IN WHAT YOU DID.

47:28 - AND THOUGH FOR EVERYTHING WOULD

47:30 - BE TO WHEN THE BREACH OF

47:31 - CONTRACT ACTION TO. YOU KNOW

47:34 - JANE WHAT YOU LOST. THIS IS

47:36 - THAT MAKES ANY SENSE.

47:40 - THANK YOU MISTER THIS

47:43 - IS MONEY. I HAVE

47:46 - NO QUESTION. RIGHT NOW

47:47 - THANK YOU. OK, LET'S DROP KIRK

47:50 - YOU KNOW PRESENTED DOWN LOW.

47:54 - AND THEY

47:55 - END UP. DESPITE THE QUESTION

47:58 - FIRST. YOU CAN SHOW THE COURT.

48:01 - AS TO PETER IS THE CASE IS WELL

48:03 - AWARE THE LEFT.

48:05 - TRADE ISSUES. SO IF YOU HAD A

48:07 - WORD TO HIM. WHERE'S THE NATION

48:09 - WOULD APPRECIATE THAT. THANK

48:12 - YOU YOUR HONOR. THE THE UNFAIR

48:14 - TRADE PRACTICES AND CONSUMER

48:16 - PROTECTION MORE WAS ENACTED BY

48:18 - THE LEGISLATURE TO PROTECT THE

48:20 - CITIZENS OF FANS GETTING FROM

48:22 - UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICES

48:24 - IN THE MARKETPLACE CHESAPEAKE

48:27 - IN ANADARKO THROUGH THIS

48:28 - LAWSUIT WOULD LIMIT THE SCOPE

48:30 - OF THE LAW. SO THAT IT WOULD

48:31 - SERVE ONLY IT'S A CONSUMER

48:33 - PROTECTION LAW WITH LIMITED

48:35 - AUTHORITY AGAIN SELLERS AND

48:37 - THEY SENT OTHER KIND OF

48:39 - COMPLETELY WHICH CONSTITUTES IN

48:41 - UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE TRADE

48:43 - PRACTICE. CHESAPEAKE IN

48:44 - ANADARKO LARGELY NEGATED THE

48:47 - AUTHORITY. YOU KNOW TO BRING

48:50 - ACTIONS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

48:52 - TO PREVENT BUSINESSES. I MEAN

48:54 - GAUGING IN AN SEAR AND JUST WHO

48:56 - TRADE PRACTICES. THEIR POSITION

48:58 - IS CONTRARY NOT ONLY THE

49:00 - STATUTORY LANGUAGE OF THE LAW

49:02 - BUT THE LIBERAL INTERPRETATION

49:04 - WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN THE LAW BY

49:06 - THIS COURT FOR THE PAST 50

49:08 - YEARS. CHESAPEAKE IN ANADARKO

49:11 - HAS TURNED UP AS ALLEGED.

49:13 - SHE'S AS THE 2 UNFAIR AND

49:16 - DECEPTIVE CONDUCT. FOR THE

49:17 - PURPOSES. THE OFFICE.

49:24 - THANKS TO

49:25 - ACCOUNT WITH THAT WE'LL

49:27 - CONCLUDE THE ARGUMENT IN THIS

49:28 - CASE AND DEBT.

49:31 - THEY SHOULD NOT. 5 MINUTES.

49:38 - >>STILL TRYING TO GET THE HANG

49:39 - OF YOUR CHILD LEARNING FROM

49:40 - HOME. LET

49:41 - US HELP A MIX ONE OH ONE THE

49:43 - VIDEO GAME IS A FUN WAY TO KEEP

49:44 - YOUR CHILD ENGAGED AND

49:46 - INTERESTED IN LEARNING ABOUT

49:47 - GOVERNMENT THE MORE THEY LEARN

49:49 - ABOUT VOTING AND OUR 3 BRANCHES

49:50 - OF GOVERNMENT. THE FURTHER THEY

49:52 - ADVANCE THROUGH QUIZZES FUND

49:54 - REVIEWS AND MORE

49:55 - SPARTA LEARNING TODAY AT THE

49:57 - PCN TV DOT COM.

49:59 - PCN PENNSYLVANIA POLITICS AND

50:02 - POLICY.

50:07 - >>THE NEXT TARGET IS IN THE

50:08 - MATTER OF NANCY KELLY RAYNER

50:10 - VERSUS NOT

50:11 - YOU DID. IT DIDN'T YOU.

50:14 - REPRESENT HIM. DRAW THIS YEAR.

50:18 - PERSONALLY

50:19 - YOU GET TO KNOW EACH BROUGHT

50:21 - EVEN WALK, REPRESENTING

50:23 - NATIONALLY. THE.

50:28 - >>I'M GOOD

50:29 - MORNING UP A TRAGEDY THAT HE

50:31 - ACTED TO PASS THE RECOVERY OF

50:33 - DAMAGES, INCLUDING EXPENSES.

50:37 - ATTORNEYS FEES AND PUNITIVE

50:38 - DAMAGES.

50:40 - WELL A PERSON WRONG TAKES PART

50:42 - IN THE TOURNAMENT.

50:44 - SHUN OR CONTINUATION OF THE

50:46 - PROCEEDINGS AGAINST NEITHER.

50:50 - THE COURT ALLOWED THE SECURE TO

50:51 - ADDRESS WAS THE APP AND

50:54 - LET THEM WENT ON TO WHOM MOTION

50:57 - FOR CONTEMPT.

51:00 - YES

51:00 - OPPOSING COUNSEL. THE CONTEXT

51:03 - OF A PENDING MEDICAL NOT

51:05 - ACTION. IN AMERICA.

51:11 - PLEASE THE COURT MY NAME

51:12 - IS ROBERT SHANER AND I ALONG

51:13 - WITH MY COLLEAGUE ABRAHAM

51:15 - RIDGE MANOR CO-COUNSEL

51:16 - KATHLEEN REBAR.

51:17 - >>AND PATRICK HEALY OF THE

51:18 - OTHER GROUP WHICH ARE

51:19 - REPRESENTING JUST A AND JUST

51:21 - MESS AND ASSOCIATES.

51:23 - WE ARE SPLITTING HER TIME PER

51:24 - COURT ORDER MISTER IN BACK WHO

51:26 - REPRESENTS THE OTHER OF PALIN'S

51:28 - WILL BE ADDRESSING THE ISSUE OF

51:29 - STANDING WHICH IS THE SECOND

51:31 - QUESTION. IN REVERSING THE

51:34 - TRIAL COURT ON THE WRONGFUL USE

51:36 - IS PROCEEDING AS PLANNED.

51:37 - THIS YEAR'S SUPERIOR COURT OF

51:39 - PENNSYLVANIA AND HAS SINCE

51:40 - EXPANDED THE POTENTIAL SCOPE A

51:42 - LIABILITY UNDER THE DRAGON

51:43 - V A AND IT IS AN OUTLIER

51:45 - DECISION IT'S A DECISION THAT

51:47 - CONSISTENT WITH OTHER HAS BEEN

51:49 - THE REESE'S THAT LOOKED AT

51:50 - THE ISSUE AND 3 REASONS THIS

51:53 - ARTICLE WHICH REVERSED

51:55 - THAT PART OF THE SPIRIT WHO ARE

51:57 - CIVIL PROCEEDING. THE FIRST

51:59 - REASON IS THAT IN MOTION

52:01 - AND THIS WAS A MOTION FOR

52:02 - SANCTIONS AND 40 TENT CONTAIN

52:04 - ANY PROMOTION DOES NOT

52:07 - CONSTITUTE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IS

52:09 - TO FIND AND THE ACT AND AS

52:11 - OUR CASES AS IN MANY DECISIONS

52:13 - HAVE LOOKED AT

52:14 - THE ISSUE. WE SHOULD LOOK AT

52:16 - CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN THAT

52:17 - CONTEXT AS A LOSS.

52:19 - IF YOU LOOK AT THE TRIAL

52:20 - COURT'S DECISION IN WHICH THE

52:22 - DEFINITION WELL THAT

52:24 - THE OTHER CASES THAT ADDRESS

52:25 - THESE ISSUES DIRECTLY ON POINT.

52:27 - EVERY OTHER CASE THAT'S LOOKED

52:28 - AT WHETHER WAS LE MARAIS

52:30 - INJECTIONS. A NEW MATTER.

52:33 - SERVICES PINA COURT HAS SAID

52:35 - NO THAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE

52:36 - CIVIL PROCEEDINGS. AND

52:39 - 2 TO RULE OTHERWISE WOULD BE

52:40 - INCONSISTENT WITH HELP

52:42 - PENNSYLVANIA HAS TO FIND IT AND

52:43 - WHAT THE CORRECT DEFINITION OF

52:45 - THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS SHOULD BE

52:47 - THE SECOND REASON IS THE

52:48 - ORIGINAL NOT FUN

52:49 - OF ME. CONTAINED A PROVISION,

52:51 - 42 PC SA

52:53 - 8355 THAT DEALT WITH NOTIONS

52:56 - BEATINGS AND OTHER

52:56 - PAPERS I THIS HONORABLE COURT

52:59 - INACTIVE RULE 1023 IN ESSENCE

53:02 - REPEAL THAT PART OF THE ACT

53:03 - AND THE POINT IS IF IN FACT IT

53:06 - REPEALED THAT WE SHOULD BE

53:07 - GOVERNED BY 1023.

53:09 - THAT'S THE APPROPRIATE

53:10 - MECHANISM BY WHICH WE SHOULD

53:11 - LOOK AT THE TENSION MOTION FOR

53:13 - SANCTIONS OR THE DENIAL OF THE

53:14 - MOTION SANCTIONS WHO

53:16 - 1023 HAS A MECHANISM WE

53:18 - CROSSED MOVE IT'S NOT THAT MISS

53:20 - RANGER HERE DID NOT HAVE BEEN

53:21 - GRANTED. SHE CHOSE. AND THE 3RD

53:24 - REASON

53:25 - IS THAT THIS IS A PUBLIC POLICY

53:27 - SHIFT. DO WE WANT TRIAL COURTS

53:30 - AND THEIR AUTHORITY TO GOVERN.

53:32 - SHE'S LIKE SANCTIONS INTACT.

53:34 - DO WE WANT THEM SECOND GUEST IN

53:35 - THE MIDDLE OF THE CASE. BUT IT

53:37 - ULTIMATELY MAY NOT BE A

53:38 - PREVAILING PART. DO WE WANT A

53:41 - FLOODGATE DRAG MY CASES BASED

53:43 - ON INDIVIDUAL

53:44 - MOTIONS MEETINGS THINGS THAT

53:46 - ARE SHOULD BE PROPERLY AND

53:47 - APPROPRIATELY GOVERNED BY 23

53:49 - AND FOR THAT REASON WE

53:50 - RESPECTFULLY REQUEST. THIS

53:52 - HONORABLE COURT REVERSED THE

53:54 - SPIRIT WITH RESPECT TO WON'T

53:55 - USE SHOOTINGS.

53:57 - >>THANK IT WILL BECOME THE

53:59 - QUESTION OR YES, THIS TIME.

54:03 - >>THANK YOU CHIEF JUSTICE, I

54:04 - HAVE NO QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME.

54:07 - >>THANK YOU JUSTICE TANI A.

54:09 - >>I MEAN THE GOOD MORNING I I

54:12 - I'M I'M A LITTLE BIT.

54:15 - >>FIRST OF ALL THE SUPERIOR

54:16 - COURTS. I DECISION

54:18 - BY I.

54:19 - >>YEAH I JUDGE I TAKE 40 ALI

54:22 - WAS

54:22 - VERY CIRCUMSCRIBED I IN ITS

54:25 - SIDE IN ITS REACH ON.

54:28 - IT REALLY CAME TO THE

54:29 - CONCLUSION THAT WHAT HAPPENED

54:31 - HERE WAYS I CAN TO ON PAR WITH

54:34 - ON A CIVIL ACTION,

54:37 - I AND I'M JUST

54:39 - WONDERING ON FROM A

54:42 - STATUTORY BASIS WHERE DO YOU

54:44 - GET THE KNOW CAN NEXT CIVIL

54:46 - PROCEEDING, ONLY MEANS

54:48 - SEVERAL ACTION WHERE THE STATUE

54:52 - IS NOT USE THAT PHRASE AND THEN

54:54 - SECONDLY.

54:56 - AND THIS IS INDISTINGUISHABLE

54:58 - FROM MY PERSPECTIVE. FROM A

55:01 - CIVIL ACTION, NOT ONLY BECAUSE

55:04 - OF THE HEARING.

55:05 - THE AWARD. BUT THE FACT THAT

55:07 - THERE WAS ACTUALLY

55:08 - AN EXECUTION. ACTION ON THIS

55:12 - AWARD

55:12 - AND GARNISHMENT BANK ACCOUNTS A

55:16 - LIEN ON HOME

55:19 - AND SO I'M JUST A FROM ME ON A

55:21 - PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVE HAVING A

55:23 - HARD TIME

55:25 - GRAPPLING WITH THE NOTION THAT

55:26 - THIS IS NOT IN E A CIVIL

55:29 - PROCEEDING.

55:32 - PART OF ITS

55:33 - CIVIL PROCEEDING NO ONE WOULD

55:34 - DISPUTE THAT IT'S NOT PART OF

55:36 - THE CIVIL PROCEEDING, BUT IT'S

55:37 - NOT.

55:37 - >>A CIVIL PROCEEDING IN ITS

55:39 - ENTIRETY WHERE IT WAS ALL

55:41 - PLAINTIFFS WHO COMMENCED AN

55:42 - ACTION AGAINST THE DEFENDANT.

55:44 - AND ULTIMATELY ONE OF THE

55:46 - PARTY'S PREVAIL, I THINK

55:47 - INCLUSION OF THE CASE AND WAS

55:48 - ABLE TO BRING

55:50 - A WRONGFUL USE CIVIL

55:51 - PROCEEDINGS CLAIM UNDER THE

55:52 - DRAGON IDEA. I

55:55 - >>YOUR ANSWER YOUR ANSWERS SAID

55:57 - WHAT'S THE BUNNY IN HALF.

55:59 - I MEAN BECAUSE SAY IF YOU WANT

56:00 - TO USE YOU ARE NOW IT'S I'M

56:03 - TURNING RAIN HERE WOULD

56:04 - BE THAT WHEN WOULD BE THE PLANE

56:07 - GETS IN THE TAKING ANY ACTUALLY

56:09 - WEIGHS A DEFENDANT I IN THE

56:13 - PROCEEDING.

56:14 - AND SO I MEAN IF IF YOU LOOK TO

56:17 - I YOU KNOW WHY THE APPARENT

56:19 - REASON FOR TAKING IDEA WHY

56:22 - WASTE TOO I

56:23 - I PREVENT OR DISCOURAGE.

56:26 - I'M PROCEEDINGS THAT HAD NO

56:28 - BASIS ON IN THE LAW OR FACT AND

56:31 - I AND I EXPRESS NO JUDGMENT AND

56:34 - THAT YEAH

56:36 - I'M HAVING A HARD TIME

56:37 - UNDERSTANDING WHY THIS DOESN'T

56:39 - FALL WITHIN THAT REAL.

56:43 - >>BECAUSE IF IN

56:44 - FACT IT WAS AN INDIVIDUAL

56:46 - REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS AND

56:47 - CONTENT AS PART OF A POST TRIAL

56:49 - MOTIONS IT ONLY GOT SEPARATED

56:51 - OUT AND WAS CONSIDERED BECAUSE

56:53 - THE TRIAL COURT WANTED TO

56:55 - ALLOW. THE APPEAL

56:57 - FROM THE TRIAL COURT'S DECISION

56:59 - ON THE DENIAL OR THE GRANT OF

57:01 - THE NEW TRIAL

57:02 - TO PROCEED. OTHERWISE IT WOULD

57:04 - NOT HAVE TAKEN ON WHAT YOU'RE

57:06 - DESCRIBING AS THE SEPARATE

57:08 - PROCESS. THERE'S NO QUESTION

57:10 - THE TRIAL COURT HANDLED IN

57:11 - THAT MANNER. BUT THAT IN AND OF

57:13 - ITSELF DOES NOT MAKE IT A

57:15 - SEPARATE CIVIL PROCEEDING WITH

57:17 - A PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT IN

57:18 - FACT, MS. RAYNER ALONG WITH

57:20 - HER CLIENTS. WE'RE ACTUALLY AND

57:23 - THE PERSON WHO WAS THE WITNESS

57:25 - WHO IS SUBJECT TO THE ELIMINATE

57:27 - ORDER. WE'RE ALL RESPONDENTS IN

57:29 - THAT PROCEEDING AND THAT THEY

57:32 - WERE NOT SEPARATE. DEFENSE THEY

57:34 - WERE

57:34 - NOT SUED. THEY WERE RESPONDENTS

57:37 - AND THEY WERE PART AND PARCEL

57:38 - TO THE CLAIMS ITSELF.

57:40 - THEY WERE NOT SEPARATE PLANES

57:41 - AND I WOULD SAY YOUR HONOR IT'S

57:43 - NO DIFFERENT. AND THERE ARE

57:44 - SUPERIOR COURT DECISIONS.

57:46 - ONE BY JUSTICE MONDAY THAT SAYS

57:48 - IN FACT IF YOU WENT ON A

57:50 - PARTICULAR CLAIM THAT DOESN'T

57:51 - GIVE YOU DRAGGING THAT YEAH I

57:52 - BELIEVE YOU HAVE TO WIN IN THE

57:54 - ENTIRE CASE AND THAT IS HOW

57:55 - IT'S BEEN INTERPRETED

57:57 - AND I UNDERSTAND WITH THE

57:58 - SPIRIT COURT SAID AND A MOTION

58:00 - FOR SANCTIONS BALL DIFFERENT NO

58:02 - QUESTION. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

58:04 - ARE GOVERNED BY

58:06 - 2 STATUTES, 42 P S P A C S A

58:09 - 25 '03 AND THE RULE THAT IS

58:11 - QUITE AN ACTIVE WILL 1023.

58:14 - THAT IS THE MECHANISM BY WHICH

58:16 - YOU SEEK SANCTIONS AND YOU CAN

58:17 - IN FACT HOW TO

58:18 - REQUEST SANCTIONS. IF IN

58:21 - FACT YOU BELIEVE THAT THE

58:22 - MOTION

58:24 - IT'S IN FROM LITIGATION IS

58:25 - WITHIN THE CASE ITSELF, I'M NOT

58:27 - A SEPARATE PROCEEDING. THANK

58:29 - YOU. I THINK YOU GUESS DOCTOR

58:32 - T. NO QUESTIONS AT

58:34 - THIS TIME. WE JUST LACKED.

58:38 - THANK YOU TO DO JUST THIS

58:39 - MORNING COUNCIL BECAUSE

58:43 - >>AS OUR PRESIDENT DEMAND A PER

58:45 - SE.

58:46 - PER SE RULE FOR INTER PARTY OR

58:49 - A PERSON DEFINITION OF

58:51 - CIVIL PROCEEDING. OR.

58:55 - OR IS THERE ROB SOMETHING TO BE

58:57 - SAID OR IN THE GOM

59:00 - I GUESS WALKS LIKE A DUCK

59:01 - QUACKS LIKE A DUCK APPROACH ARE

59:05 - ORDERED.

59:07 - >>WELL I THINK THE CONCERN

59:08 - WITH THE SUPERIOR COURT AND I

59:10 - UNDERSTAND THE LOSS OF CONDUCT

59:11 - ON SECOND THOUGHT I JUST THINK

59:13 - THAT THAT THEY CAME OUT ON THE

59:15 - WRONG END OF THE WAY. THE ONLY

59:17 - CASES THAT HAVE LOOKED AT THE

59:18 - ISSUE HAD DECIDED. THIS

59:20 - IS NOT THE FIRST TIME THAT A

59:22 - PART OF THE CASE HAS BEEN

59:23 - LOOKED AT AND THAT'S THE POINT

59:25 - IS A PRELIMINARY INJECTIONS OR

59:26 - I MATTER.

59:30 - YOU KNOW AS

59:31 - A SUBPOENA. WE UNDERSTAND THAT

59:33 - CAN TAKE ON A PART AND PARCEL

59:35 - OF A CIVIL PROCEEDING,

59:36 - BUT THE WAY THE COURTS HAVE

59:37 - ALWAYS INTERPRET IT IS IT'S THE

59:39 - ENTIRETY OF THE

59:40 - PERHAPS WE DO NEED A DEFINITION

59:42 - FROM THIS COURT TO CLARIFY THIS

59:44 - POINT SO THAT WE DON'T OPEN THE

59:45 - FLOODGATES FOR ACTIONS OF

59:47 - DRAGON ANY BASED THEY SHOULD BE

59:49 - FOLLOWING 1023.

59:51 - >>WHAT ABOUT THE CLAIM FALSE

59:52 - CLAIM OF.

59:55 - YOU HAVE THAT SORT OF

59:56 - THING IN HER IN HER PLAYERS, I

59:58 - JUST TRYING TO TEST THE LIMITS

59:59 - 130 OF

01:00 - 01.190 YOUR DEFINITION.

01:00 - 03.290 >>ABSOLUTELY BOTH CAMPAIGNS

01:00 - 04.700 CERTAINLY DIFFERENT BECAUSE A

01:00 - 06.630 COUNTERCLAIM CAN BE BROUGHT UP

01:00 - 08.700 A COUNTERCLAIM COULD HAVE THE

01:00 - 10.930 EFFECT OF A SEPARATE ACTION.

01:00 - 12.160 BUT THE REALITY IN A

01:00 - 14.500 COUNTERCLAIM AS YOU PREVAIL,

01:00 - 15.910 YOU HAVE TO PREVAIL ON BOAT

01:00 - 17.060 RIGHT YOU HAVE TO PREVAIL ON

01:00 - 18.390 THE PLANE AND HEAT AND YOU HAVE

01:00 - 20.170 TO PREVAIL POTENTIALLY ON THE

01:00 - 20.850 COUNTER CLAIM

01:00 - 23.070 AND WHAT ME AND THE COMPANY AND

01:00 - 25.000 I HAVE LITIGATED CASES WHERE

01:00 - 26.320 THE CASE AND SHE DOES GO ON IN

01:00 - 28.080 YOUR HOME LELAND YEE THE AGENT

01:00 - 29.600 CLAIMS SO THE

01:00 - 31.770 PLAY DID AND THAT THE DEFENDANT

01:00 - 33.080 BE I MEAN THE PLAINTIFF THE

01:00 - 34.120 PRIOR PLANT BECOMES

01:00 - 36.290 THE DEFENDANT AND REVERSE AND

01:00 - 38.570 SO A COUNTERCLAIM IS A SEPARATE

01:00 - 40.070 CAUSE OF ACTION CAN BE

01:00 - 42.300 INITIATED A COUNTERCLAIM

01:00 - 43.870 OBVIOUSLY TAKEN PLACE

01:00 - 45.450 A CAUSE OF ACTION AND CAN BE

01:00 - 46.830 TRIED SEPARATELY DOESN'T HAVE

01:00 - 47.620 TO BE BROUGHT ART

01:00 - 48.580 PARTIAL FACE.

01:00 - 50.600 >>IF I MAKE ONE MORE THING ON

01:00 - 52.860 ONE ABOUT OR LOOK YES, WHAT

01:00 - 54.760 WOULD YOU SUGGEST TO US.

01:00 - 59.290 BY WAY OF INTERPRETING THE

01:00 - 02.380 CURIOUS SECTION. 1, 0, 2, OF

01:01 - 03.380 TITLE, 42.

01:01 - 08.010 SPECIFICALLY TO THE DEFINITION

01:01 - 09.330 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY GET US

01:01 - 13.000 THERE SEATING. ENDING WITH

01:01 - 14.990 THE WORDS, BUT THE TERM DOES

01:01 - 17.210 AND I QUOTE BUT THE TERM DOES

01:01 - 20.640 NOT INCLUDE. AN ACTION OR AN

01:01 - 21.150 APPEAL.

01:01 - 24.570 I DON'T

01:01 - 26.380 LIKE AN NECESSARILY INTERPRET

01:01 - 27.850 THAT TO WHAT I CAN SAY ABOUT

01:01 - 28.620 EMOTIONS.

01:01 - 30.390 >>NOBODY HERE IS TELLING YOU

01:01 - 31.950 THAT EMOTION IS NOT PART.

01:01 - 34.460 OPRAH C OKAY, IT IS PART OF

01:01 - 36.170 PROCEEDING. BUT IS IT WHAT THE

01:01 - 38.200 DRIVING ANY ACT INTENDED

01:01 - 39.750 BY CIVIL PROCEEDINGS

01:01 - 41.280 TERMINATING IN THEIR FAVOR I

01:01 - 42.260 WOULD JUST POINT OUT

01:01 - 44.220 THE RISK THAT YOU RUN IS

01:01 - 46.490 THAT POTENTIALLY WE NEED PARTY

01:01 - 47.830 ON THE CALL OF PREVAILING

01:01 - 49.120 PARTY, THE WINNING PARTY IN A

01:01 - 51.220 MOTION MAY ULTIMATELY NOT BE

01:01 - 52.830 THE PREVAILING PARTY INDICATES

01:01 - 54.750 WHICH THEN CREATES THIS HUGE

01:01 - 56.340 INCONSISTENCY IN HURST, THE

01:01 - 58.290 DRAGON AREA WHICH AGAIN I DON'T

01:01 - 00.130 REPEAT MYSELF I COME BACK TO

01:02 - 01.640 THIS IS WHY THIS HONORABLE

01:02 - 02.520 COURT OBLIGATED

01:02 - 05.240 1023. FOR THIS REASON IT HAS A

01:02 - 07.160 MECHANISM IN A SAFE HARBOR TO

01:02 - 08.920 DO WITH WHAT SOME PARTY THEY

01:02 - 10.150 CONSIDER TO BE A FRIVOLOUS

01:02 - 12.380 MOTION CRIME THAT E THANK YOU.

01:02 - 13.900 THANK YOU MR.

01:02 - 17.400 WE'RE NOW GOING INTO YES, YOU

01:02 - 18.570 BUY YOUR TIME OF NEED.

01:02 - 21.140 PIEDMONT I'VE

01:02 - 23.510 NOT GOOD. WE COULD ASK YOU IF

01:02 - 23.960 YOU HAD

01:02 - 28.160 YOU TO MAKE A BRIEF ARGUMENT OF

01:02 - 29.150 THEM WILL COMMENCE THE

01:02 - 33.440 QUESTION. MAKES THIS COURT AND

01:02 - 35.090 BROUGHT IT BACK AND

01:02 - 37.110 I REPRESENT THE VERDICT WINNER

01:02 - 39.730 BELOW ROSLYN SUCH AND

01:02 - 41.880 THE CLAIRE'S AND DEFENDANTS IN

01:02 - 44.130 THE CASE. MAKE USE

01:02 - 46.660 OF COURT. I WANT TO GO RIGHT

01:02 - 47.130 TO.

01:02 - 49.890 THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN OF

01:02 - 52.870 THE QUESTION. THAT JUST ON A

01:02 - 56.260 U.S. MISTER TENET. EVEN IF YOU

01:02 - 56.840 ACCEPT.

01:02 - 02.100 SO THE RECORDS YOU. THIS WAS A

01:03 - 04.200 CIVIL PROCEEDING. THERE'S A

01:03 - 06.860 STATUTORY REQUIREMENT. YOU

01:03 - 10.060 MUST PREVAIL ON ALL CLAIMS.

01:03 - 11.670 I JUST AS

01:03 - 13.880 MONDAY WHEN SHE WAS A IN THE

01:03 - 14.680 SUPERIOR COURT

01:03 - 17.480 ROAD AGAIN CLASSY VERSUS STARK

01:03 - 19.930 74 LAND 3RD TO 42.

01:03 - 22.590 2 TRILLION 13 BILLION IN WHICH

01:03 - 25.330 SHE CLEARLY, AND THAT'S YOU YOU

01:03 - 26.930 HAVE TO WEIGH ALL CLAIMS

01:03 - 30.120 AGAINST. IN THIS CASE. IT'S

01:03 - 32.110 RAIN OR AND HER FIRM. WE'RE

01:03 - 33.930 SANCTION SEPARATELY FROM THE

01:03 - 35.960 SANCTIONS THAT THIS CASE IS ALL

01:03 - 36.200 THIS.

01:03 - 38.760 SHE WAS DISQUALIFIED FROM

01:03 - 40.590 FURTHER PROCEEDING IN THE CASE.

01:03 - 42.440 AND BOTH SHE AND HER FIRM

01:03 - 45.800 WHERE FI. A LITTLE UNDER $2000

01:03 - 48.490 FOR A NIGHT OUT. SO SHE DID SHE

01:03 - 50.630 IS NOT AND PREVAILING PARTY

01:03 - 53.070 EVEN LOOK AT THE CASE WHERE THE

01:03 - 55.440 SPIRIT QUICK 8. HOWEVER THE WAY

01:03 - 57.060 THE SPIRIT QUICK LOOK AT THIS

01:03 - 00.020 CASE IGNORED I THINK QUESTION

01:04 - 01.690 FROM THIS COURT IN ORANGE

01:04 - 04.830 VS O'MALLEY. 1996 DECISION OF

01:04 - 06.010 THIS COURT RECORD

01:04 - 07.930 STATED THAT ONE WHO HAS A

01:04 - 10.150 GENERAL RULE, ONE WAS NOT

01:04 - 11.510 ACCORDING TO THE UNDERLYING

01:04 - 11.950 ACTION

01:04 - 14.780 CANNOT SUE 100 REGULATED AND IT

01:04 - 17.900 WAS A VERY NARROW BUT OTHER

01:04 - 19.170 THAN THAT IT'S A BRIGHT LINE

01:04 - 20.860 TEST. IT ISN'T JUST

01:04 - 24.700 TIME AND HAS BEEN EXCEPT IN

01:04 - 27.420 THIS CASE IN A APPLIED IN EVERY

01:04 - 29.730 OTHER CASE. THANK YOU RIGHT

01:04 - 31.020 WE'RE GOING TO HEAR IT, THANK

01:04 - 33.130 YOU. I LIKE WE'RE GOING TO.

01:04 - 34.430 AND

01:04 - 36.950 IT'S A ANY OF THE JUSTICES ARE

01:04 - 38.810 QUESTIONS BEGINNING AS I SAID

01:04 - 39.390 WITH SAID.

01:04 - 42.680 SHE WAS MY NEW NAME YOU JUST GO

01:04 - 42.980 OUT.

01:04 - 46.080 CITATION TO

01:04 - 48.860 MY CAN ASK ME QUESTIONS,

01:04 - 49.410 THANKS.

01:04 - 52.310 >>HE JUST HAS ONE DAY. YES,

01:04 - 53.070 JUST THERE.

01:04 - 56.810 COUNCIL I HAVE A QUESTION E

01:04 - 59.910 YOU HEARKEN BACK TO THE OTHER

01:04 - 01.130 COLLATERAL PROCEEDING.

01:05 - 03.270 >>I INVOLVING THE LETTER TO THE

01:05 - 06.050 HOSPITAL. WHAT ABOUT THE FACT

01:05 - 08.010 THAT YOUR CLIENT. WHAT A NEW

01:05 - 09.790 TRIAL. HOW DOES

01:05 - 12.250 THAT IMPACT THE QUESTION

01:05 - 13.670 OF WEATHER.

01:05 - 17.730 IT WAS A WHEN AND WHETHER THE

01:05 - 19.180 OTHER SIDE PREVAILED IN THIS

01:05 - 19.550 CASE.

01:05 - 22.050 >>YOU ARE

01:05 - 23.900 NO QUESTION THAT RONALD SITES,

01:05 - 25.560 THEY'LL ULTIMATELY IN THE CASE

01:05 - 27.580 YOU GOT I WAS SHE WON THE FIRST

01:05 - 28.280 CASE TOO.

01:05 - 30.310 BUT IT WAS INADEQUATE AND YOU

01:05 - 32.010 BECAUSE OF THE OF THE ISSUE

01:05 - 33.650 THAT THE BOARD IS HERE.

01:05 - 36.500 BUT SHE IS THE ULTIMATE MAILING

01:05 - 36.970 PARTY IN

01:05 - 39.140 THIS CASE AND AND THERE'S NO

01:05 - 40.330 QUESTION ABOUT THAT WHEN YOU

01:05 - 41.650 LOOK AT IT FROM THE STANDPOINT

01:05 - 42.420 OF THE UNDERLYING

01:05 - 44.390 A MEDICAL NOW I GUESS MY

01:05 - 46.570 QUESTION IS NO SPECIFIC WHY AND

01:05 - 47.820 AND I'M HE WILL BE MISSING

01:05 - 48.160 SOMETHING.

01:05 - 50.930 >>WHY IS MS. RADNER THE

01:05 - 53.680 PREVAILING PARTY ON THE TRAIN.

01:05 - 56.390 WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WHEN SHE IS

01:05 - 57.060 TRUE SHE

01:05 - 57.840 GOT THE.

01:05 - 00.890 >>WARD OF VIE FOR CONTEMPT

01:06 - 01.700 VACATED.

01:06 - 02.300 >>BUT

01:06 - 04.520 SHE DID. BUT WHEN IT KICKS IN

01:06 - 06.430 THAT SAME PROCEEDING NEUTRALITY

01:06 - 07.830 LISTEN THIS IS SOMETHING.

01:06 - 10.500 >>BUT IF YOU ARE JUST BELOW ME

01:06 - 12.350 OF A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE CASE

01:06 - 14.260 THE JUDGE JUST MONEY DECIDED.

01:06 - 16.710 THERE WAS A CASE IN WHICH A

01:06 - 19.080 DEFAMATION CLAIM WAS WROUGHT BY

01:06 - 20.490 THE BY THE PLAINTIFF IN THE

01:06 - 22.770 UNDERLYING CASE. THE PLAINTIFF

01:06 - 26.090 WITHDREW THAT CLAIM AND PUT IN

01:06 - 27.030 6 DIFFERENT.

01:06 - 29.790 ALLEGATIONS OF OF CLAIMS

01:06 - 30.530 AGAINST THE.

01:06 - 33.400 PARTY WHO BECAME THE LATEST

01:06 - 34.700 FROM THE DRAGON ANY CASE.

01:06 - 37.650 WHEN CASEY WHAT UNDERGROUND IN

01:06 - 38.660 A MINE,

01:06 - 40.610 HE SAID NO YOU'VE GOT TO WIN OR

01:06 - 42.190 YOUR CLAIM YOU CAN'T JUST WIN

01:06 - 44.240 ONE CLAY. YOU HAVE TO BE THE

01:06 - 46.110 PREVAILING PARTY AND ALL CLAIMS

01:06 - 46.690 AND THAT IS

01:06 - 48.640 THE WAY ALTHOUGH LOWER COURTS

01:06 - 51.240 HAVE INTERPRETED. I DID WRITE

01:06 - 52.800 IN A CASE AND THE STATUTORY

01:06 - 55.690 REQUIREMENT OF REALLY PARTY AND

01:06 - 57.110 BECAUSE IN THIS CASE.

01:06 - 59.680 MISS RAIN OR AT HER FOR MORE

01:06 - 01.920 SANCTIONS. ON OTHER CONTENT

01:07 - 02.910 CLAIMS

01:07 - 06.180 MADE BY THESE ARE THE BAD NEWS

01:07 - 07.960 IF YOU IF YOU PREVAIL BEFORE

01:07 - 09.240 THIS COURT TODAY ARE YOU GOING

01:07 - 10.290 TO TURN AROUND AND SELL A

01:07 - 12.090 DRAGON ANY ACT AGAINST THE MS.

01:07 - 12.500 RAYNER.

01:07 - 14.210 >>ARE WE TRYING TO DO IN THIS

01:07 - 14.900 CASE FOR THE NEXT

01:07 - 15.640 40 YEARS.

01:07 - 17.690 >>YOU'RE I'VE NEVER FILED A

01:07 - 21.150 UH HUH AT THIS POINT IN MY

01:07 - 24.090 LIFE, I DON'T THANKS TO YOU OR

01:07 - 25.140 I GUESS IS TIED.

01:07 - 28.640 >>I HAVE NO

01:07 - 30.790 QUESTIONS CHIEF. THIS IS

01:07 - 33.840 FROM HERE. YOU COUNSEL I MEAN

01:07 - 35.700 YOU TRY ONE MORE TIME ON.

01:07 - 36.820 >>IT SAID NO,

01:07 - 39.430 I ARE GOAL HERE

01:07 - 42.510 TO I DU N INTERPRETATION OF THE

01:07 - 44.730 STATUTE THAT USES THE PHRASE

01:07 - 46.320 CIVIL PROCEEDINGS.

01:07 - 48.900 >>IT IS NOT A STATUTE THAT USES

01:07 - 51.070 THE PHRASE CIVIL ACTION.

01:07 - 55.120 AND IN THAT CLIMB TAX ON HOW DO

01:07 - 55.840 WE YEAH

01:07 - 57.560 FROM THE USE OF THE

01:07 - 59.990 PHRASE BY THE LEGISLATURE OF

01:07 - 02.120 CIVIL PROCEEDING TO YOUR

01:08 - 02.760 POSITION

01:08 - 06.400 THAT IS REQUIRES ON A COMPLAINT

01:08 - 07.250 I E A

01:08 - 10.650 CIVIL ACTION. IN ORDER TO

01:08 - 13.440 TRIGGER ANY POTENTIAL BE

01:08 - 14.320 BREAKING ANY A.

01:08 - 18.070 >>SINCE THE KIND OF ANY ACT

01:08 - 20.900 WAS ENACTED THAT HAS UNTIL

01:08 - 23.150 THIS CASE THAT HAS BEEN THE WAY

01:08 - 24.110 IN WHICH IT

01:08 - 26.300 HAS BEEN. IN TERMS OF THE

01:08 - 28.040 REASONS THAT MISTER INTERSTATE

01:08 - 29.880 I WOULD ALSO SAY THERE'S NO

01:08 - 31.860 CASE LIKE BY IN THIS

01:08 - 33.520 COMMONWEALTH. I.

01:08 - 37.070 INTERVIEW WAY THE SUPERIOR

01:08 - 39.120 COURT IT. IN FACT WHEN YOU LOOK

01:08 - 40.780 NATIONWIDE SEARCH. A

01:08 - 43.050 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. YOU FIND

01:08 - 46.030 NO CASE THE WAGE ANY COURT HAS

01:08 - 48.820 EVER HELD. INTRA.

01:08 - 51.130 MOTION

01:08 - 51.960 FOR CONTENT.

01:08 - 55.750 SURE SANCTIONS SATISFIES THE

01:08 - 59.560 REQUIREMENT AND BACK TO YOU WAS

01:08 - 02.060 IN CASE WHICH IS CITED THE

01:09 - 04.300 AND THE IN THE MESS

01:09 - 06.060 OF DEBRIS. L WAS A CASE IN

01:09 - 07.380 WHICH A CALIFORNIA COURT.

01:09 - 07.930 THE

01:09 - 11.220 CIVIC LEE CRITICIZED A AND B

01:09 - 13.200 NOT THE WAY IN WHICH WE

01:09 - 14.510 SHOULD BE APPROACHING SHOULD BE

01:09 - 16.720 APPROACHING IT HAS REALLY PARTY

01:09 - 17.220 IN THE

01:09 - 19.810 UNDERLYING LITIGATION AND IN IN

01:09 - 21.360 THE CASE OF ROSEN VERSUS

01:09 - 22.710 AMERICAN BANK YOU REALLY HAD

01:09 - 23.730 THE SAME THING YOU'RE AN

01:09 - 26.050 INSULAR PROCEEDING AGAINST PAUL

01:09 - 28.540 ROSEN, A LAWYER AND IN THAT

01:09 - 29.360 CASE.

01:09 - 32.360 THE COURT SAID NO YOU CAN'T BE

01:09 - 34.370 A DRAG ON ANY PLAYER BECAUSE

01:09 - 35.570 YOU ARE NOT A PARTY, YOU KNOW

01:09 - 37.510 THE LYING ACTION IN POLASKI

01:09 - 38.580 VERSUS MARCO

01:09 - 39.120 YOUR HONOR.

01:09 - 42.280 >>YEAH, I'M AWARE OF THE CASE

01:09 - 42.820 LAW BY.

01:09 - 45.780 >>I DIDN'T NEED ME.

01:09 - 48.970 >>THE ESSENCE OF WHAT

01:09 - 51.320 HAPPENED HERE. IT'S VERY HARD

01:09 - 52.870 TO DISTINGUISH FROM WHAT WOULD

01:09 - 55.900 OCCUR IN A QUOTE UNQUOTE CIVIL

01:09 - 57.490 ACTION AND I'LL SAY IT AGAIN, I

01:09 - 59.110 MEAN THERE IS NOT ONLY 3 DAY

01:09 - 01.700 TRIAL. MANY AWARD A MILLION

01:10 - 02.350 DOLLARS

01:10 - 05.680 AND THEN EXECUTION IMAD WARD.

01:10 - 06.740 >>ON.

01:10 - 09.400 >>WHAT WHAT DISTINGUISHES WHAT

01:10 - 11.000 HAPPENED HERE IN

01:10 - 13.040 REALITY FROM WHAT HAPPENS IN A

01:10 - 13.780 SENATE LAST.

01:10 - 16.660 >>I WAS I WOULD SUBMIT THAT IT

01:10 - 19.080 WAS A MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND

01:10 - 22.200 OR CONTENT. IS NOT DIFFERENT

01:10 - 24.400 THAN ANY OTHER. A GARDEN

01:10 - 26.340 VARIETY MOTION FOR SANCTIONS.

01:10 - 28.660 YOU WOULD BE GIVING STANDING

01:10 - 31.050 TO ANY LAWYER

01:10 - 33.910 OR PARTY WHO WINS A SANCTION

01:10 - 35.730 MOTION TO THEN TURN AROUND AND

01:10 - 38.590 BRING BRIAN A AND I WOULD POINT

01:10 - 40.620 OUT THAT IN THIS CASE,

01:10 - 42.140 YOUR HONOR. THE

01:10 - 44.490 DOCTOR GELLER WHO IS THE

01:10 - 46.190 DEFENDANT IN THE CASE AN TO END

01:10 - 48.080 WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONE 3RD

01:10 - 51.080 OF THE VERDICT IN THIS CASE WAS

01:10 - 52.800 RESPONDING IN THE CONTENT TO

01:10 - 54.770 SEE. DOCTOR YELLER COULD HAVE

01:10 - 56.310 BEEN A PLANE HAS EASILY EASILY

01:10 - 56.640 AS YOU'RE

01:10 - 58.820 A NERD AND BECAUSE HE KNEW

01:10 - 00.990 THERE WAS NO THE IN HIS CASE HE

01:11 - 02.350 WANTED A TRIAL RUN LOW.

01:11 - 05.640 AND AND IF YOU EXPAND THE REACH

01:11 - 07.840 OF THIS LAW THAT WAY YOU'RE

01:11 - 10.080 GOING TO HAVE CASE AFTER CASE

01:11 - 12.300 AFTER CASE. ALL WITHIN THE

01:11 - 14.540 INSULAR PROCEEDINGS OF A LARGER

01:11 - 17.150 CASE. WE'RE PLAINTIFF IN THE

01:11 - 19.250 ANCILLARY PROCEEDING, RYAN ANY

01:11 - 21.870 CASE. THEY NEED TO LOSE IN THE

01:11 - 23.580 ULTIMATELY LARGE CASE WHICH I

01:11 - 25.530 DON'T THINK GET THIS A PAID BY

01:11 - 27.020 THE STATUTE FOR REQUIRE MONEY

01:11 - 28.760 BE A PREVAILING PARTY.

01:11 - 29.830 >>OK THANK YOU.

01:11 - 31.540 THANK YOU.

01:11 - 33.420 >>THANKS ED TO BOTH COUNTS OF

01:11 - 35.660 WHO WORSHIPED MASON BEFORE WE

01:11 - 37.080 TURNED THE GUN.

01:11 - 41.260 WHO SAYS SHE IS. THANK YOU

01:11 - 43.730 THANK YOU. CLOSING I WOULD I

01:11 - 47.050 WITHOUT THAT THE OF HOLDING IN

01:11 - 47.830 THIS CASE.

01:11 - 50.850 IN ORDERS TO QUESTIONS IN THIS

01:11 - 53.190 CASE COURT THE 1996 DECISION

01:11 - 54.370 OUR PERSONAL VALUE WHICH I

01:11 - 57.030 MENTIONED AND THE 2002 ORDER OF

01:11 - 00.330 THIS COURT WHICH SUSPENDED 8355

01:12 - 02.660 WHICH WOULD HAVE GIVEN STANDING

01:12 - 04.190 FOR SANCTIONS UNDER THE

01:12 - 06.590 DRIVING IDEA. THE SUPERIOR

01:12 - 07.820 COURT IGNORED HIS OWN

01:12 - 10.750 BRIGHT-LINE TEST. IN THIS CASE

01:12 - 12.540 THE IGNORED BUT EVEN IF

01:12 - 14.330 YOU AGREE, AND THE SANCTIONS

01:12 - 16.020 MOTION IS A A SEPARATE

01:12 - 18.670 PROCEEDING. THE SUPERIOR COURT

01:12 - 20.590 IGNORED THE FACT THAT MISS RAIN

01:12 - 21.050 OR AND

01:12 - 23.170 HER FIRM WE'RE NOT REALLY OR

01:12 - 24.760 USE FOR THAT REASON YOUR HONORS

01:12 - 26.510 I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST WERE

01:12 - 28.280 REVERSED. THE DECISION OF THE

01:12 - 30.080 SECURITY COURT. HE WAS FROM THE

01:12 - 32.020 TRIAL FOR US THIS WILL PLAY.

01:12 - 40.780 >>MEMBERS OF THE COURT ROOM.

01:12 - 43.220 HAYNES AND I REPRESENT

01:12 - 45.780 MEETING WEEK. PERIODICALLY YOU

01:12 - 46.660 HAVE BROKEN OUT.

01:12 - 49.220 I DON'T MEAN THE AUDIO PORTION

01:12 - 50.220 I DON'T SEE ANY

01:12 - 52.350 OF YOU AND WHAT IF YOU HAVE TO

01:12 - 53.650 SEE IF YOU HAVE DIFFICULTY

01:12 - 55.870 HEARING ME PLEASE LET ME KNOW

01:12 - 57.580 AND IF I DON'T GET AN ENTIRE

01:12 - 58.910 QUESTION THAT YOU MAY ASK.

01:12 - 01.140 I MAY ASK YOU TO REPEAT NOT

01:13 - 02.900 BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE MY HEARING

01:13 - 04.880 AIDS IN BUT BECAUSE YOU'VE

01:13 - 07.700 BROKEN UP AND I THINK JUST

01:13 - 11.300 DONAHUE REALLY. HAS PUT HER

01:13 - 13.960 FINGER ON GOT PRINCIPAL

01:13 - 15.190 ISSUE HERE

01:13 - 19.450 AND INDEED. MY OPPONENTS ARE

01:13 - 21.020 DOING EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO

01:13 - 22.410 STUFF THE RABBIT IN

01:13 - 24.960 THE HAT. THE QUESTION IS

01:13 - 27.750 VERY SIMPLE. WHAT KNOWN AS THE

01:13 - 31.090 STATUTE ME WHEN IT SAYS

01:13 - 32.980 IT WILL PROCEEDING.

01:13 - 35.510 WORLD AND I WANT TO GO INTO THE

01:13 - 37.830 HISTORY OF THIS BACK TO I THINK

01:13 - 39.800 I KNOW IT WELL, BUT IT'S

01:13 - 42.800 NOT NOT DIRECTLY RELEVANT HERE

01:13 - 43.920 EXCEPT TO

01:13 - 46.270 THE EXTENT THAT THIS STATUTE

01:13 - 48.490 WAS SPECIFICALLY DRAFTED.

01:13 - 53.190 AND THE SCOPE OWN I'M A

01:13 - 53.980 LAWSUIT OR

01:13 - 56.080 CLAIM FOR WRONGFUL USE OF CIVIL

01:13 - 56.870 PROCEEDING.

01:13 - 00.180 THAT'S MY THE

01:14 - 02.180 ARGUMENT TO THE CONTRARY.

01:14 - 03.790 THE AIR ISN'T LOCATED.

01:14 - 07.850 PENNSYLVANIA THAT STANDS THAT

01:14 - 10.960 THEY WILL PUSH SEEDINGS ME.

01:14 - 15.920 SINGLE SO WHO LAWSUIT.

01:14 - 17.870 RECEDING.

01:14 - 21.780 AND PROCEEDED IF THIS COURT

01:14 - 23.790 WERE TO LOOK YOU WOULD SEE THAT

01:14 - 27.140 THERE ARE ROUGHLY 3,000 CASES.

01:14 - 29.500 REPORTED.

01:14 - 32.640 THAT REFERRED TO

01:14 - 34.650 CONTEMPT WHO

01:14 - 37.670 SEE NEWS. THIS WAS NOT A MOTION

01:14 - 39.590 THIS WAS A PROCEED EVENING.

01:14 - 43.160 AND AS A PROCEEDING IN ALL WHO

01:14 - 43.860 HAVE BEEN.

01:14 - 48.620 CLEARED UNDERSTANDING WHY THANK

01:14 - 51.120 YOU AND AND AND CURRENT RATE IN

01:14 - 52.560 THE ARGUMENT OF MY OPPONENTS.

01:14 - 53.880 NO COURT

01:14 - 57.290 HAS SAID THAT IT IS SIMPLY A

01:14 - 59.230 LAWSUIT AND NOTHING MORE.

01:14 - 02.370 THAT I'M GOING TO RISE PURSUING

01:15 - 05.370 A DRAGON 80. WE I'M.

01:15 - 07.030 WANT TO TALK

01:15 - 08.650 ABOUT THAT PROBABLY PUBLIC

01:15 - 09.900 POLICY ISSUE.

01:15 - 13.090 NOT ONLY TO THE 2 BRIEFLY TO

01:15 - 13.900 THIS EXTENT.

01:15 - 21.700 IN THE TRIAL COURT. IT'S AN

01:15 - 23.900 EMBARRASSMENT. IT IS

01:15 - 25.010 AN EMBARRASSMENT.

01:15 - 27.600 THE JUDGE WHO OVERSAW

01:15 - 29.880 THE PROCEEDING. IT'S AN IN

01:15 - 31.930 PERSON IN THE LAWYERS WHO

01:15 - 34.490 BROUGHT IT. THEY MISREPRESENTED

01:15 - 35.260 BACK.

01:15 - 38.400 WHO CAN DELIVER DAYS WITH THE

01:15 - 41.690 LANGUAGE THAT WAS OFFENSIVE AND

01:15 - 44.670 IF YOU SAY WELL WHY YOU KNOW TO

01:15 - 46.940 CATCH THIS WITH POLICY OR

01:15 - 48.970 IN THAT WE WOULD OPEN THE DOOR

01:15 - 50.330 TO THESE KINDS OF LAWSUITS.

01:15 - 54.250 RESPECTFULLY SUGGEST YOU'RE

01:15 - 54.580 DOING.

01:15 - 58.930 THANK STRAY.

01:16 - 04.190 >>I'M HERE AT THAT AGE OSTIA

01:16 - 05.720 YOU KNOW YOU CAN SEE IS THAT

01:16 - 07.570 EXHAUSTING TIME WE'VE SET ASIDE

01:16 - 09.390 FOR EUROPE. THE STATEMENT SO

01:16 - 11.410 YOU MIGHT WANT TO TAKE A FEW

01:16 - 12.490 MINUTES ON

01:16 - 15.970 ANY QUESTIONS. THAT A COURT

01:16 - 17.210 MIGHT HAVE BEEN WILL BEGIN

01:16 - 18.930 THOSE WITH SAID JUSTICE SAID

01:16 - 19.490 DAUGHERTY.

01:16 - 24.140 AS A FORMER TRIAL

01:16 - 26.760 LAWYER I HAVE A CONCERN SHARED

01:16 - 28.530 WITH ME THAT IN THIS COURT

01:16 - 30.330 FINDS DRAGON 80 UNDER THE

01:16 - 32.650 CIRCUMSTANCES I EMOTION

01:16 - 33.050 CRACKED.

01:16 - 36.940 >>WHAT PREVENTS THE WRECK OF

01:16 - 37.010 THE

01:16 - 39.590 DRAGON AD. WHAT'S IT BEEN A

01:16 - 41.790 NORMAL TRIAL EVERY TIME.

01:16 - 45.530 YOUR ADVERSARY TRIES TO

01:16 - 46.240 PRACTICE

01:16 - 48.690 MOTIONS OR WHAT IS IT THE

01:16 - 51.890 ECONOMY IF WE

01:16 - 54.530 FOLLOW THROUGH OR IN YOUR

01:16 - 57.290 BELIEVE BAD. MOTION

01:16 - 59.850 PRACTICE IS DRAGON EDDIE AND

01:16 - 02.170 SECONDARY TO THAT WHY DRAG A

01:17 - 03.620 NAVY WHEN YOU COULD GOT REALLY

01:17 - 05.580 23 POINT WANT.

01:17 - 09.830 WELL THAT THERE ARE 2 PRONGS TO

01:17 - 12.740 THAT GUY. MR. JUSTICE

01:17 - 15.620 EXCUSE ME. NUMBER ONE THIS IS

01:17 - 17.530 NOT MOTIONS PRACTICE. THIS IS

01:17 - 20.080 NOT IN TROUBLE WHO GAVE INTER

01:17 - 21.750 TRUMP MY OWN MOTION PRACTICE.

01:17 - 24.780 THIS IS A SEPARATE. THEY WILL

01:17 - 25.710 RECEIVE YOU.

01:17 - 29.340 HE ASKED HIM 23 ADDRESS IT IS

01:17 - 31.560 THE COMMON MOTION PASSED ON IS

01:17 - 33.060 THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT BUT

01:17 - 35.640 1023 DIDN'T ABROGATE THE

01:17 - 37.880 DRAGON IDEA AND THE DRAGON AND

01:17 - 41.130 THE FACT IS THERE TOO. WOW

01:17 - 42.490 OR A MUCH

01:17 - 45.050 BROADER SWEEP. AND SIMPLE

01:17 - 47.870 MOTION PRANK. I AGREE WITH YOU

01:17 - 49.900 THAT IF IF BRANDON ANYWHERE

01:17 - 53.470 OPEN UP TO YOU AND FROM.

01:17 - 55.110 I'M

01:17 - 56.810 NO MOTION. WE'RE IN THE

01:17 - 58.220 PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS THAT

01:17 - 00.740 WOULD BE AN ABSURD AND NONE OF

01:18 - 04.210 US. I THINK WAIT THAT'S

01:18 - 05.740 REALLY DIFFERENT. WELL

01:18 - 08.270 IT WASN'T. THIS WASN'T HANDLED

01:18 - 09.210 AS A MOLE.

01:18 - 11.780 SHANNON, EVEN DURING THE MOTION

01:18 - 13.780 FOR NEW TRIAL IT WAS HANDLED AS

01:18 - 15.700 A SEPARATE PROCEEDING. AND

01:18 - 16.920 CHARACTERIZED AS A

01:18 - 19.600 SEPARATE PROCEEDING. THERE WAS

01:18 - 21.800 A CLAIM MADE THERE WAS

01:18 - 24.240 TESTIMONY TAKE IN THERE WAS

01:18 - 25.900 ARGUMENT BY COUNCIL.

01:18 - 28.640 AND IF YOU LOOK YOU MY CLIENT

01:18 - 30.120 IS A PARTY TO THAT.

01:18 - 32.930 THOUGH IT'S VERY DIFFERENT

01:18 - 35.100 THAN BIN AND KIND OF MOTION

01:18 - 36.370 PRACTICE, YOUR NICHE MARKET.

01:18 - 39.360 MIKE MCCLURE SELECTED THAT

01:18 - 39.600 ROUTE.

01:18 - 41.640 HALF OF MY

01:18 - 43.560 CONCERN IS THAT YOU SAY THIS IS

01:18 - 45.170 A SEPARATE CIVIL PROCEEDING IF

01:18 - 46.580 I FILED A MOTION TO COMPEL

01:18 - 47.120 DISCOVERY

01:18 - 47.830 AGAINST YOU.

01:18 - 49.530 >>YOU DIDN'T COMMENT INVOLVED

01:18 - 51.220 THROUGH DISCOVERY BY THE COURT

01:18 - 52.570 ORDERED A AND THEN I FILE A

01:18 - 54.430 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS. YOU HAVE

01:18 - 56.980 INFO HERE. WE DO HAVE EVIDENCE

01:18 - 59.260 IN THE NBA JUST GOOD.

01:19 - 06.190 I RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE

01:19 - 07.650 WITH THAT THAT'S NOT THE CASE

01:19 - 09.900 THAT'S WHAT 1023 IS INTENDED TO

01:19 - 10.450 ADDRESS.

01:19 - 12.250 >>ARE YOU TALKING TO ONE.

01:19 - 13.320 I WAS DONE.

01:19 - 16.200 NOW YOU CAN ANSWER THE QUESTION

01:19 - 17.610 ENCOURAGED. HERE.

01:19 - 20.560 I THINK YOU'RE HAVING A DELAY,

01:19 - 21.690 SO I APOLOGIZE

01:19 - 24.560 TO MAKE. I DO MY WHOLE LIFE

01:19 - 26.040 YOUR MOUTH MOVING AND I THOUGHT

01:19 - 27.640 YOU'RE STILL TALKING BY PHONE.

01:19 - 33.350 >>HE CAN DO IT IT IS A THAT

01:19 - 35.040 ABSOLUTELY DIFFERENT THING

01:19 - 37.860 AND 23. WHAT IS INTENDED TO

01:19 - 39.290 ADDRESS THE SIMPLE MOTION

01:19 - 40.860 SITUATION. THIS IS

01:19 - 43.750 NOT BAD. THIS IS A UNIQUE

01:19 - 45.480 PROCEEDING AT WHY.

01:19 - 48.830 AND CONTEMPT RECEDING IS ALL

01:19 - 49.280 ABOUT

01:19 - 53.300 MRS. I MISS ISRAEL WHO WAS HELD

01:19 - 54.920 IN CONTEMPT BY

01:19 - 57.180 THE COURT. NO COURT IS GOING

01:19 - 59.880 TO. INCLUDE

01:19 - 02.540 OR STAY, MANY SANCTION FOR A

01:20 - 04.500 FRIVOLOUS MOTION IS A CONTEMPT

01:20 - 07.180 AND COME TO WAR. IT'S NOT IT'S

01:20 - 08.790 NOT AN ORDER. NO

01:20 - 11.180 IT'S NOT AND IT TO DRAGGING.

01:20 - 13.950 THANK YOU THANK YOU, MISTER AND

01:20 - 15.130 SAID JUST WORK.

01:20 - 17.170 >>THANK YOU DOES THIS

01:20 - 19.410 COUNSELOR WARNER FURTHER PURSUE

01:20 - 20.880 THAT LINE OF QUESTIONING I

01:20 - 23.380 DON'T DISCERN IN YOUR ARGUMENT

01:20 - 24.900 ANY SATISFACTORY LIMITING

01:20 - 27.370 PRINCIPLE OTHER THAN A LOT.

01:20 - 29.580 IT'S DRAGNET A ELIGIBLE WHEN

01:20 - 30.440 YOU SAY IT IS

01:20 - 32.610 EVERY MEMBER OF THIS COURT WAS

01:20 - 34.050 EITHER A TRIAL JUDGE OR TRIAL

01:20 - 36.160 LAWYER OR BOTH WHO'S BEEN IN

01:20 - 38.540 COUNTLESS HEARINGS AND I DON'T

01:20 - 42.270 I DON'T DISCERN ANY. AND

01:20 - 44.960 IN PRINCIPLE IN YOUR ARGUMENT

01:20 - 46.600 THAT WOULD

01:20 - 48.890 HEART OUT ANY OF THE HEARINGS

01:20 - 50.750 IN WHICH ANY OF US PRESIDED OR

01:20 - 53.260 PARTICIPATED HAS NOT ATTRACTED

01:20 - 55.040 TO LEE DRAGON ANY ELIGIBLE IT

01:20 - 58.080 CERTAINLY CAN'T BE. LIMITED TO

01:20 - 59.570 CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS. I DON'T

01:20 - 00.890 THIS TURNED OUT TO BE YOUR

01:21 - 02.960 ARGUMENT. I CERTAINLY CAN'T BE

01:21 - 04.430 SOMETHING INVOLVING MS. RAYNER

01:21 - 06.530 OBVIOUSLY IT CAN'T BE SOMETHING

01:21 - 08.650 THAT WHEN

01:21 - 10.030 A BUNCH OF US SITTING AROUND A

01:21 - 11.460 TABLE FEELS AND IT'S BIG

01:21 - 11.940 ENOUGH.

01:21 - 18.200 THERE INNUMERABLE

01:21 - 20.590 SCENARIOS IN

01:21 - 22.510 WHICH IF YOUR

01:21 - 25.120 ARGUMENT IS ACCEPTED IN SEEMS

01:21 - 28.160 TO ME. THAT

01:21 - 31.030 WE WILL SEE A DRAGON AT THE

01:21 - 32.440 PROLIFERATION WE CERTAINLY

01:21 - 34.230 CAN'T JUST EXPECT THAT DUMB.

01:21 - 37.350 LAWYERS WILL SHOW RESTRAINT OR

01:21 - 38.860 ASKED LAWYERS TO SHOW RESTRAINT

01:21 - 40.080 AND WALK AWAY FROM.

01:21 - 42.260 WELL I'M GOING TO ASK

01:21 - 45.580 YOU AGAIN. IT WAS A CLEAR

01:21 - 47.030 LIMITING PRINCIPLE.

01:21 - 48.860 WHAT THIS

01:21 - 51.700 THING ENCOMPASSES OFFICER THEN

01:21 - 52.670 BOY THIS WAS A REALLY

01:21 - 54.170 OUTRAGEOUS ONE THIS HAS TO BE

01:21 - 55.320 DRAGNET BE ELIGIBLE.

01:22 - 02.700 WELL JUST A FEW AT YOU MISTER

01:22 - 04.320 JUST 6 YOU ACT.

01:22 - 07.150 >>I'M TROUBLED BY YOUR QUESTION

01:22 - 10.130 FRANKLY TO THIS EXTENT. THE

01:22 - 12.580 DRAGON ANY ACTION HAS TO

01:22 - 15.720 CONFORM TO AND ALL

01:22 - 19.040 THE REQUIREMENTS OLD THE ACT.

01:22 - 20.780 FIRST OF ALL.

01:22 - 23.360 IT'S GOT TO INVOLVE A PARTY

01:22 - 27.750 NOW. ANY COMMON MOTION I DON'T

01:22 - 30.320 SEE NOW OPPOSING COUNSEL WHO

01:22 - 32.530 WOULD POSSIBLY BE A PARTY.

01:22 - 34.980 HERE, MRS.

01:22 - 36.670 RAINER WAS

01:22 - 40.140 A PARTY AND THE ONLY PARTY TO

01:22 - 44.240 CLAIM OR. CONTENT SECONDLY

01:22 - 46.840 THERE HAS TO BE A LOSS. A

01:22 - 49.480 LAWYER WHO LOSES SHOE

01:22 - 53.970 THE COMPOUND DISCOVERY. THROUGH

01:22 - 54.710 A LOT.

01:22 - 58.670 IT JUST.

01:22 - 00.510 >>IT SEEMS TO

01:23 - 01.950 ME THAT IT IS SOME

01:23 - 03.430 DISTINGUISHABLE FROM THE

01:23 - 04.180 COMMON.

01:23 - 06.790 >>MOTION THEN IT.

01:23 - 10.230 AND I HATE TO SAY THIS TO YOU

01:23 - 11.990 BUT IT'S PATENTLY OBVIOUS THAT

01:23 - 14.410 THERE'S A DISTINCTION BETWEEN

01:23 - 16.720 THE 2. I AND

01:23 - 18.820 I KNOW I DON'T KNOW THAT I CAN

01:23 - 21.150 BETTER ARTICULATED IN THAN I

01:23 - 23.770 ALREADY HAVE. IT YOU KNOW THAT

01:23 - 26.560 THIS COURT WITH ALL DUE RESPECT

01:23 - 26.640 TO

01:23 - 29.240 MY COMMENTS. I MADE A SPECIFIC

01:23 - 32.580 POINT IN THE HART CASE. THERE

01:23 - 35.080 ARE EXCEPTIONS AND

01:23 - 37.600 IN HEART AND JUST ARE STILL

01:23 - 39.960 VIOLENT KAYLA LITERALLY

01:23 - 42.060 DESCRIBES THIS UNIQUE

01:23 - 42.920 SITUATION.

01:23 - 50.320 I DON'T SEE HOW THAT ACT.

01:23 - 54.070 TRANS POSES INTO THE COMMON

01:23 - 55.060 MOTION IN A NAME.

01:23 - 57.100 IF YOU, IT IS NOT A PERSON

01:23 - 59.570 SEEDING. THERE ISN'T EVIDENCE

01:23 - 00.910 TAKEN IN A MOTION.

01:24 - 02.780 THERE ISN'T A FINDING BY THE

01:24 - 05.270 COURT THERE IS A NEW ORDER THAT

01:24 - 07.690 HAS BEEN VIOLATED ALL OF THOSE

01:24 - 10.270 THINGS. AND THIS IS SORRY, YOU

01:24 - 11.170 DON'T GET

01:24 - 14.120 TO MOTION. I'M JERRITA CONTEMPT

01:24 - 15.630 PROCEEDING WITHOUT A VIOLATION

01:24 - 16.490 OF AN ORDER.

01:24 - 19.370 AND THOUGH I MEAN

01:24 - 21.970 MOTION PRACTICE DOESN'T INVOLVE

01:24 - 23.630 A VIOLATION OF AN ORDER.

01:24 - 25.980 I SUPPOSE IF

01:24 - 28.310 AND DILATORY LAWYER SAID WELL

01:24 - 30.660 I'M GOING. I'M NOT GOING TO DO

01:24 - 33.150 WHAT. THE COURT SAYS.

01:24 - 37.170 THEORETICALLY THE COURT WHO

01:24 - 41.050 WOULD I TRY TO HOLD THAT LAWYER

01:24 - 43.230 YOU CAN WHO Y AWAITING THE

01:24 - 44.880 ORDER THAT LAWYER WOULD BE

01:24 - 46.430 ENTITLED TO A HEARING AND A

01:24 - 48.180 FINDING AND THE COURT WOULD

01:24 - 49.950 HAVE TO DETERMINE. THERE WERE

01:24 - 51.670 SOME MEANINGFUL DAMAGES.

01:24 - 55.900 TO ME IT IS INCONCEIVABLE THE

01:24 - 57.270 DAD EVER GETS TO THE POINT

01:24 - 59.000 WHERE THERE'S A LAWSUIT WITH

01:24 - 00.790 WILD. THAN THAT

01:25 - 02.760 GERBER 8 THE DRAGON ANY UH I'M

01:25 - 04.910 NOT GOING TO POINT TO AND NOT

01:25 - 06.290 ONLY WAS SANCTION NOT ONLY DID

01:25 - 07.650 THE LAWYERS GO AFTER HER BANK

01:25 - 08.200 ACCOUNTS.

01:25 - 10.790 SHE LOST. WE LOST HER JOB FOR

01:25 - 12.920 ONLY 10 SLEEPER ISSUE WAS THE

01:25 - 14.840 SUBJECT OF WE'RE GOING TO WIN

01:25 - 16.820 THAT YOU CAN REALLY PROBABLY AS

01:25 - 18.740 FAR WEST AS PITTSBURGH. I MEAN

01:25 - 20.010 THIS WAS REPORTED THROUGHOUT

01:25 - 22.790 THE COUNTRY. THIS IS

01:25 - 25.140 SO DISTINGUISHABLE NOT JUST

01:25 - 27.260 NEWS RANGE CASE AND IT'S SO

01:25 - 30.110 DISTINCTION. BUT IT CRIES OUT

01:25 - 33.660 TO ME. NOW THIS PARTICULAR WE

01:25 - 36.360 INTEND RECEDING IS PRECISELY

01:25 - 37.150 WHAT THE ACT.

01:25 - 50.480 >>JUST THIS MONTH. AND NO

01:25 - 53.780 QUESTIONS. I JUST DESPAIR.

01:25 - 57.080 MISTER HAYNES'S.

01:25 - 00.210 IS THERE A CASE LAW ON WHETHER

01:26 - 01.500 THIS ACTION BE CONSTRUED

01:26 - 02.830 BROADLY OR NARROWLY.

01:26 - 07.030 >>WELL THERE'S A GREAT DEAL OF

01:26 - 07.750 CASE LAW.

01:26 - 10.050 YEAH IN PENNSYLVANIA, ALBEIT

01:26 - 11.480 FROM THE FEDERAL CORPORATE TUNE

01:26 - 11.580 IN

01:26 - 13.850 FEDERAL COURTS. I'M I'M

01:26 - 15.580 CONSISTENTLY IN PENNSYLVANIA,

01:26 - 17.540 YOU MOSTLY IN THE MIDDLE OF THE

01:26 - 18.590 WESTERN DISTRICT.

01:26 - 26.940 FOR HE SAID.

01:26 - 32.050 ANCILLARY PROCEEDINGS.

01:26 - 35.070 I OR GET IN YOU'RE RIGHT.

01:26 - 39.100 AND I'M HAVING A LITTLE

01:26 - 40.030 DIFFERENT I HAD THAT VERY

01:26 - 42.870 LITTLE BIT BECAUSE. THE

01:26 - 43.920 RESTATEMENT OF TALK.

01:26 - 48.120 THE LAW IN PENNSYLVANIA.

01:26 - 50.310 I'M SORRY AND I SAID THE

01:26 - 52.500 RESTATEMENT OF TORTS MAY OR MAY

01:26 - 54.330 NOT BE THE LAW IN PENNSYLVANIA

01:26 - 54.770 ON THIS

01:26 - 57.270 PARTICULAR SUBJECT. YOU ALL

01:26 - 00.180 HAVE DONE IF I DID IT IN AND AT

01:27 - 01.320 LEAST ONE CASE.

01:27 - 04.630 IT IS OBVIOUSLY LED INSPECTIONS

01:27 - 06.410 SHOULD NOT WORK. AND

01:27 - 08.740 SPENT 74 IN

01:27 - 11.900 SUBSECTION F IT'S ABOUT

01:27 - 15.000 ANCILLARY PROCEEDING. AT BEST

01:27 - 16.000 THIS IS AN ANCILLARY

01:27 - 18.470 PROCEEDING. LISTENING DETROIT'S

01:27 - 20.850 MATT LONGER MANNING TRIAL.

01:27 - 42.150 I CAN GET A CAR WITH

01:27 - 43.090 THIS STRANGE.

01:27 - 45.680 >>RIGHT I THINK I'VE WE'VE LOST

01:27 - 46.640 TO DO. YOU

01:27 - 48.480 CAN CARRY. NOW SO I DON'T KNOW

01:27 - 49.910 AND THE STREAMS WE'VE LOST THAT

01:27 - 52.660 MISTER RANGE. YOUR AND YOU

01:27 - 53.080 BACK.

01:27 - 58.910 >>IF YOU CAN HEAR ME,

01:27 - 59.610 I'M HERE.

01:28 - 01.310 >>OKAY LET'S DO IT THIS WAY

01:28 - 01.920 SAYS THERE'S

01:28 - 02.670 A LITTLE.

01:28 - 05.040 >>THEY GO THERE FOR GARDY WE

01:28 - 05.570 BELIEVE THE

01:28 - 08.020 YEAR AT A JUSTICE BEARS GOING

01:28 - 09.180 TO PUT HIS QUEST

01:28 - 12.180 YEAR AGAIN. YOU RESPONDED THEM

01:28 - 13.120 WE'RE GOING TO INCLUDE THE

01:28 - 13.620 ARGUMENT.

01:28 - 18.460 >>ONE WHY SHOULD

01:28 - 20.180 WE NOT IT'S TRUE IT'S

01:28 - 22.400 VERY NARROWLY PROHIBIT THE

01:28 - 23.060 LAWSUIT

01:28 - 26.070 AND EYES. YOUR CLIENT AND THE

01:28 - 27.380 OTHER LAWYERS AND I AGREE IT'S

01:28 - 28.690 AN APPALLING SITUATION, BUT

01:28 - 30.020 THEY'RE ANGRY WITH EACH OTHER.

01:28 - 31.730 IT IS A MATTER OF POLICY WE

01:28 - 32.720 DON'T WANT YOU FIGHTING IN OUR

01:28 - 33.420 SANDBOX.

01:28 - 39.640 >>WELL I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE

01:28 - 40.100 QUESTION

01:28 - 45.160 IS WHY WHERE HE IS THERE I.

01:28 - 47.950 MEGAN I THIS THANK

01:28 - 51.420 >>WE'RE GOING TO CONCLUDE THE

01:28 - 52.200 ARGUMENT AND

01:28 - 57.360 THAT'S THE FIRE YOU FOR THAT

01:28 - 58.740 MORNING IN A CAN.

01:29 - 02.000 >>PCN IS WORKING TO HELP KEEP

01:29 - 03.380 PENNSYLVANIANS INFORMED AS

01:29 - 04.800 RESTRICTIONS ARE LIFTED ACROSS

01:29 - 06.290 THE STATE JOIN US DAILY FOR

01:29 - 08.460 CORONAVIRUS IMPACT A DISCUSSION

01:29 - 09.630 WITH CIVIC BUSINESS AND

01:29 - 11.520 GOVERNMENT LEADERS ON COVID-19

01:29 - 13.770 IMPACT ON LIFE DURING AND AFTER

01:29 - 15.010 THE PANDEMIC IN P A

01:29 - 17.050 STAY WITH PCN IS WE PROVIDE

01:29 - 18.760 PENNSYLVANIANS WOULD LIVE UP TO

01:29 - 20.050 THE MINUTE INFORMATION FROM THE

01:29 - 21.390 GOVERNOR AND DEPARTMENT OF

01:29 - 23.130 HEALTH CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE

01:29 - 25.230 WATCH PCN ON CABLE AND STREAM

01:29 - 27.020 FREE ON THE PCN APP.

01:29 - 31.470 >>UNITS IN

01:29 - 33.770 THE MATTER. THE NEW FORCES

01:29 - 35.230 MITCHELL GREGORY PECK JUNIOR.

01:29 - 37.480 MISTER

01:29 - 40.270 PECK'S USES RICE WAS IN

01:29 - 42.890 COMMONWEALTH IS CHANGED PITCH.

01:29 - 46.200 GOOD MORNING.

01:29 - 49.250 ON IN THIS CRIMINAL CASE.

01:29 - 52.090 NOW THIS IS SUFFICIENCY OF THE

01:29 - 53.500 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING HIS

01:29 - 56.030 CONVICTION. A DRUG DELIVERY

01:29 - 57.400 RESULTING IN IT.

01:29 - 00.170 ALSO ON THE GROUNDS THAT HIS

01:30 - 02.510 CONDUCT DID NOT OCCUR. IN

01:30 - 03.380 PENNSYLVANIA.

01:30 - 11.640 WARRIORS COUNCIL. IT WAS

01:30 - 12.070 THE COURT.

01:30 - 13.910 >>MY NAME IS BRIAN MCEWEN WITH

01:30 - 14.710 THE YORK COUNTY PUBLIC

01:30 - 16.630 DEFENDER'S OFFICE AND REPRESENT

01:30 - 18.160 THE APPELLANT MITCHELL JUNIOR.

01:30 - 20.720 THIS CASE IS SIMPLE.

01:30 - 22.960 THE PARTIES AGREE THAT FOR A

01:30 - 24.140 DRUG DELIVERY RESULTING IN

01:30 - 25.450 DEATH. THERE MUST BE A

01:30 - 27.210 VIOLATION OF PENNSYLVANIA'S

01:30 - 28.570 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE DRUG

01:30 - 29.740 DEVICE AND COSMETIC.

01:30 - 32.190 SO THIS CASE REALLY COMES DOWN

01:30 - 33.110 TO WHETHER THERE WAS SUCH

01:30 - 35.550 A VIOLATION. LOU REED QUESTION

01:30 - 36.930 OCCURRED IN MARYLAND AS OPPOSED

01:30 - 37.710 TO PENNSYLVANIA.

01:30 - 40.830 TO THE PLAIN TEXT OF THE ACT

01:30 - 42.420 THERE SIMPLY WAS NO VIOLATION.

01:30 - 48.070 PROVIDES A LIST OF ACTIVITIES

01:30 - 49.360 THAT ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN THE

01:30 - 49.840 CALM.

01:30 - 52.350 ONE OF THESE ACTIVITIES

01:30 - 53.350 DELIVERY OF A CONTROLLED

01:30 - 54.070 SUBSTANCE.

01:30 - 56.870 BUT THROUGH NO DELIVERY WITHIN

01:30 - 58.510 THE COMMONWEALTH AGAIN YOUR

01:30 - 00.300 DELIVERY HERE. POLICE IN

01:31 - 00.770 MARYLAND.

01:31 - 03.300 THERE'S JUST NO GETTING AROUND

01:31 - 04.720 THIS CLEAR LIMITATION ON WHAT

01:31 - 06.310 THE ARE THOSE AND DOES NOT

01:31 - 06.740 PREVENT IT.

01:31 - 09.310 THE DRUG DELIVERY RESULTING IN

01:31 - 10.930 DEATH PROSECUTION. THIS

01:31 - 12.810 PROVISION MAN DAYS. THE

01:31 - 14.240 DELIVERY OCCURRED WITHIN THE

01:31 - 15.350 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA.

01:31 - 16.890 A MARYLAND.

01:31 - 19.600 YEMEN. NOT SOME OTHER PLAYERS

01:31 - 21.100 ONLY A PENNSYLVANIA DELIVERY

01:31 - 21.620 WILL DO.

01:31 - 24.330 HE TOLD ME SEVERAL TIMES TO GET

01:31 - 26.020 AROUND THE STICKS. BUT NONE OF

01:31 - 26.730 THEM SUCCEED.

01:31 - 29.570 CALLER USED PRINCIPALLY THERE'S

01:31 - 30.790 A VIOLATION OF THE ACT.

01:31 - 32.940 EVEN THOUGH YOU CONVICTED UNDER

01:31 - 33.690 THE ACT WOULD HAVE BEEN

01:31 - 35.090 CATEGORICALLY IMPOSSIBLE.

01:31 - 37.530 THIS IS PROBLEMATIC AS A MATTER

01:31 - 38.600 OF COMMON SENSE BECAUSE IT'S

01:31 - 39.850 HARD TO SEE HOW SOMETHING THAT

01:31 - 42.210 EDWARD LEE BRICE THE CONVICTION

01:31 - 43.970 THAT RESET YOU THAT IS A

01:31 - 45.380 VIOLATION OF THAT STATUTE.

01:31 - 47.440 AND MORE FUNDAMENTALLY.

01:31 - 50.480 WITH THE COLD IS REALLY ARGUING

01:31 - 51.760 IS THAT THERE WAS A VIOLATION

01:31 - 54.720 SUBSECTION 8.30 WHICH DESCRIBES

01:31 - 55.430 DELIVERIES.

01:31 - 57.610 BUT IN SAYING THAT WAS OVER

01:31 - 58.970 GUARD TO WHAT SECTION DAY

01:31 - 01.190 ACTUALLY SAYS CAN I WORK IN

01:32 - 02.820 THIS CASE BECAUSE IT THAT

01:32 - 04.780 CONTAINS NOT JUST THAT WITHIN

01:32 - 05.930 THE COMMONWEALTH LANGUAGE.

01:32 - 07.330 BUT IT CONTAINS THE CREWED

01:32 - 08.260 MISSION ITSELF.

01:32 - 11.150 THE COURT CANNOT LOOK TO

01:32 - 13.060 SUBSECTION 8.30 WITHOUT REGARD

01:32 - 14.390 TO WHAT IT SAYS IN SECTION

01:32 - 14.640 THAT.

01:32 - 18.010 COLE ALSO WORRIED THAT TOURISTS

01:32 - 19.450 ARE SUPERVISION. THE

01:32 - 22.230 CRIME SCHOOL. RISE TO ASK YOU A

01:32 - 24.640 GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATION. NOW

01:32 - 25.680 THROUGH SOCIAL MODERATE WHO

01:32 - 26.100 SAYS THERE

01:32 - 28.190 IS JURISDICTION OVER THE DRUG

01:32 - 29.180 DELIVERY RESULTING IN DEATH

01:32 - 30.190 CHARGE BECAUSE ONE OF ITS

01:32 - 31.370 ELEMENTS THE DEATH OF MISTER

01:32 - 32.680 HANS TOOK PLACE IN

01:32 - 35.250 PENNSYLVANIA. THEY HAD NOTHING

01:32 - 36.380 TO DO WITH AN

01:32 - 38.600 ENTIRELY SEPARATE GEOGRAPHICAL

01:32 - 39.680 RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN THE

01:32 - 41.390 ACT. THE

01:32 - 43.170 UPSHOT IS YES, THERE IS

01:32 - 44.880 JURISDICTION OVER DRUG DELIVERY

01:32 - 45.340 RESULTING IN

01:32 - 47.320 DEATH CHARGE. THE COMO FEEL THE

01:32 - 48.410 CREW ONE OF THE CENTRAL

01:32 - 49.630 ELEMENTS BECAUSE THERE WAS NO

01:32 - 51.170 VIOLATION OF THE ACT.

01:32 - 52.670 THAT'S WHEN MISTER BECK'S

01:32 - 53.560 CONVICTION INJURED IN A

01:32 - 55.350 SENTENCE. SHE DID.

01:32 - 57.740 >>THANK YOU MISTER E-MAIL WERE.

01:32 - 00.880 WE FINALLY HAVE A SIMPLE CASE

01:33 - 07.020 >>GOOD MORNING.

01:33 - 10.290 >>I'D LIKE TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT

01:33 - 12.380 I SECTION ONE '02 OF

01:33 - 13.240 THE CLAIMS.

01:33 - 15.860 >>I'M AND I'M REALLY INTERESTED

01:33 - 18.490 IN YOU OR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT

01:33 - 21.700 THE PURPOSE OF SECTION 102 YES.

01:33 - 24.350 ON END. I'M GOING TO CALL YOUR

01:33 - 26.750 ATTENTION TO A PHRASE THAT I

01:33 - 29.460 HEAR IS IN SOME PARAGRAPH 8.

01:33 - 34.340 STATES I'M AT EXCEPT AS

01:33 - 35.870 OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS

01:33 - 38.520 ACTION. IT SAYS A PERSON MAY BE

01:33 - 38.810 CAN

01:33 - 41.380 BET IT AND UTILIZING THIS

01:33 - 43.020 COMMONWEALTH AND THEN IT GOES

01:33 - 43.650 ON IN LESS

01:33 - 46.360 CERTAIN SITUATIONS. THE GOOD

01:33 - 48.000 NEWS IS THAT THAT LANE BRIDGE

01:33 - 50.920 MEANS A PERSON MAY BE

01:33 - 51.980 PROSECUTED.

01:33 - 54.110 THAT'S

01:33 - 55.530 CORRECT YOUR NECK BUT THAT'S

01:33 - 57.680 NOT WHAT SECTION ONE O TO A

01:33 - 00.220 YES. IT SAYS A PERSON

01:34 - 00.970 MAY BE

01:34 - 03.850 IN DECADES. SO I KNOW YOU TAKE

01:34 - 05.430 THE POSITION THAT SECTION ONE

01:34 - 09.400 '02 IS ON A JURORS GET SHOULD

01:34 - 12.060 KNOW OPERATION. ALTHOUGH IT'S

01:34 - 14.250 CALLED TERRITORIAL APPLE GOING

01:34 - 14.310 TO

01:34 - 16.440 BE SO YOU RECONCILE THAT

01:34 - 18.330 LANGUAGE FOR ME LANGUAGE THAT

01:34 - 20.520 SAYS A PERSON MAY BE CAN GET IT

01:34 - 22.090 WITH YOUR INTERPRETATION IS

01:34 - 23.690 THAT WHAT HE ACTUALLY SAYS A

01:34 - 25.370 PERSON MAY BE PROSECUTED.

01:34 - 28.820 BECAUSE I BELIEVE IT'S A

01:34 - 30.090 JURISDICTIONAL PROVISION, YOUR

01:34 - 30.500 HONOR.

01:34 - 32.300 >>YES, I THINK IT'S YOU KNOW.

01:34 - 34.270 I THINK YOU JURISDICTIONS

01:34 - 35.620 OBVIOUSLY A PREREQUISITE TO ANY

01:34 - 37.820 CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. AND SO I

01:34 - 39.640 THINK THE WAY IT IS A PERSON

01:34 - 41.570 MAY BE CONVICTED. THAT

01:34 - 42.480 CERTAINLY THAT'S

01:34 - 45.230 THAT'S TRUE. IT IS TUESDAY MAY

01:34 - 46.590 BE CONVICTED OF ALL OF THE

01:34 - 48.350 ELEMENTS OF ANTHRAX THAT MOVING

01:34 - 48.720 BEYOND A

01:34 - 49.630 REASONABLE DOUBT.

01:34 - 51.340 >>WHY DID THEY LET ME JUST LET

01:34 - 52.970 ME JUST INTERJECT THERE BECAUSE

01:34 - 54.450 I UNDERSTAND YOUR ARGUMENT AND

01:34 - 56.340 I APPRECIATE IT AND I ALMOST

01:34 - 56.640 AGREE

01:34 - 56.960 WITH THAT.

01:34 - 00.590 >>HAHA I'M I'M I'M A LITTLE

01:35 - 01.140 BIT.

01:35 - 04.480 >>I'M ME BY THE LANGUAGE THAT

01:35 - 06.060 TALKS ABOUT THE PERSON MAY BE

01:35 - 08.310 CONVICTED NOT A PERSON MAY BE

01:35 - 09.000 PROSECUTED.

01:35 - 12.860 >>WELL, I MEAN OBVIOUSLY I

01:35 - 15.110 I DO PERSONALLY SEE A CONFLICT

01:35 - 16.020 BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE 2

01:35 - 17.840 VERSIONS. HOWEVER, IF THERE IS

01:35 - 19.410 A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE 2 OF

01:35 - 21.850 THEM. CERTAINLY IN THIS

01:35 - 23.250 SITUATION, THE MORE

01:35 - 25.690 SPECIFIC YEAH LEGISLATION THE

01:35 - 27.200 ACT WHICH APPLIES DIRECTLY TO

01:35 - 28.280 THE CONDUCT THAT WE'RE LOOKING

01:35 - 30.100 AT WE HAVE TO CONTROL OVER

01:35 - 31.200 WHATEVER IT SAYS

01:35 - 32.660 AS A GENERAL MATTER OF THE

01:35 - 34.410 CRIMES GO UNDER SECTION WANTS

01:35 - 34.690 TO.

01:35 - 40.660 IF THERE IS A CONFLICT THAT IS

01:35 - 42.320 HOW I WOULD RESULT, OK

01:35 - 42.810 THANK YOU.

01:35 - 44.520 >>I GUESS IT'S DOCTOR T.

01:35 - 49.390 THE QUESTION THE QUESTION IS

01:35 - 51.990 THAT THE D R AND B FALLS UNDER

01:35 - 54.680 THE CRIME CODE DEALING WITH

01:35 - 57.170 HOMES YET. IT'S WITHIN

01:35 - 59.120 THAT STATUTE MAKES REFERENCE TO

01:35 - 59.600 THE

01:35 - 01.770 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE. SO

01:36 - 03.890 THEY'VE WERE FAR IF WE FOLLOW

01:36 - 05.990 THIS RECONSTRUCTION, WHY 1, ONE

01:36 - 08.630 '02 INTRO THAT THING WHERE THE

01:36 - 09.430 BODIES DOWN.

01:36 - 12.370 >>HERE I THINK ONE OF THOSE WHO

01:36 - 14.050 DOES CONTROL IS FAR AS THE

01:36 - 15.680 JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION THIS

01:36 - 17.230 CANCER. THAT'S WHY I THINK

01:36 - 18.480 THERE IS JURISDICTION

01:36 - 19.670 OVER THE DRUG DELIVERY

01:36 - 20.810 RESULTING IN DEATH CHARGE

01:36 - 22.790 BECAUSE MR. HUNT'S BODY WAS SO

01:36 - 25.400 BADLY. BUT IT CONSISTENTLY

01:36 - 27.080 ARGUED ALL ALONG IN THIS CASE.

01:36 - 28.550 IT JUST SETS THE STAGE FOR

01:36 - 29.790 POSSIBLE PROSECUTION.

01:36 - 32.280 IT HAS JURISDICTION. YES THEY

01:36 - 33.200 MADE THE CORRECT WAS A

01:36 - 34.170 JURISDICTION TO BRING A

01:36 - 35.780 PROSECUTION BUT THEN THEY

01:36 - 36.740 BROUGHT A DRUG DELIVERY

01:36 - 37.980 RESULTING IN DEATH CHARGE

01:36 - 40.090 IN THAT PARTICULAR CHARGE HAS

01:36 - 41.370 THIS LANGUAGE THAT REQUIRES A

01:36 - 43.210 VIOLATION OF THE ACT WHICH IN

01:36 - 45.130 TURN REQUIRES SOMETHING

01:36 - 45.860 TO HAVE OCCURRED IN

01:36 - 47.500 PENNSYLVANIA IN ORDER FOR A

01:36 - 48.620 VIOLATION TO OCCUR.

01:36 - 51.510 CERTAINLY IF THERE IS NO

01:36 - 53.140 JURISDICTION, THE WHOLE ORDEAL

01:36 - 54.740 WAS OVER AND THEY COULDN'T RUN

01:36 - 56.030 ANY CHURCH AT ALL.

01:36 - 58.440 BUT HERE THE JURISDICTION ALLOW

01:36 - 59.250 THEM TO GREEN

01:36 - 01.250 SOME SORT OF CHARGE ON THE

01:37 - 02.670 BASIS OF MR. HUNT'S DEBT

01:37 - 03.540 BECAUSE THAT OCCURRED

01:37 - 05.460 IN PENNSYLVANIA. I THINK THE

01:37 - 07.040 REQUIRE A PERSON MAYBE THEY

01:37 - 08.710 COULD ROBOTS OR A MANSLAUGHTER

01:37 - 10.350 CHARGE IT WANTED TO DO THAT.

01:37 - 12.170 WELL IT BECAUSE

01:37 - 14.140 THEY BROUGHT WHATEVER REASON

01:37 - 15.640 CAN'T CONTAIN VERY SPECIFIC

01:37 - 17.820 CLAIMS THAT WIRES A VIOLATION

01:37 - 19.860 OF THE ACT. YEAH, I THINK A

01:37 - 22.000 VERY SPECIFIC LANGUAGE. IT CAN

01:37 - 24.300 FIND THESE PROVISIONS AND

01:37 - 25.490 TUESDAY'S OCCURRING WITHIN THE

01:37 - 26.840 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

01:37 - 27.850 WE JUST DON'T HAVE IT.

01:37 - 30.620 >>WHERE ARE YOU SHARE WITH US

01:37 - 33.760 BACK THE DEATH OF B. THIS TODAY

01:37 - 36.540 ABOUT. SEE INDIVIDUAL

01:37 - 38.920 GOES UNPUNISHED. BECAUSE OF BAD

01:37 - 42.350 GENERAL ASSEMBLY. OUR.

01:37 - 44.730 >>I DON'T NECESSARILY

01:37 - 47.740 TO GET TO THE FIRST PART OF

01:37 - 48.650 YOUR QUESTION.

01:37 - 51.070 CERTAINLY HAVE TO GO UNPUNISHED

01:37 - 52.980 AS NOTED, IT COULD HAVE BROUGHT

01:37 - 54.030 SOME SORT OF OTHER CHARGE

01:37 - 57.170 PERHAPS ON THE BASIS. THE DEATH

01:37 - 58.390 OF HER IN PENNSYLVANIA

01:37 - 00.270 IS THIS PARTICULAR CHARGE

01:38 - 00.770 CONTINUES

01:38 - 02.630 PARTICULAR OWENS. THERE'S ONLY

01:38 - 04.060 ONE WHO WILL IN THIS CASE

01:38 - 05.330 BECAUSE OF THE WAY THINGS

01:38 - 07.710 PANNED OUT. NOW IS FOR IS

01:38 - 08.960 WHETHER SOMEONE ELSE IN ANOTHER

01:38 - 10.090 JURISDICTION COULD BROTHER

01:38 - 11.970 CHARGED. I DON'T KNOW ABOUT IT

01:38 - 13.210 CERTAINLY A POSSIBILITY.

01:38 - 15.020 BUT AS FAR AS WHETHER THE

01:38 - 15.840 LEGISLATURE MADE

01:38 - 17.620 A MISTAKE. I DON'T THINK THEY

01:38 - 19.020 NECESSARILY MADE A MISTAKE HERE

01:38 - 20.650 I THINK TO BE USED VERY CLEAR

01:38 - 22.010 LANGUAGE IS REASONABLE TO

01:38 - 24.380 PRESUME INTO THE EFFECTS OF

01:38 - 26.590 THAT LANGUAGE TO TAKE PLACE AND

01:38 - 27.700 THAT'S ESPECIALLY TRUE WHERE

01:38 - 28.910 THE DRUG DELIVERY RESULTING IN

01:38 - 30.390 DEATH STATUTE MAKES SPECIFIC

01:38 - 32.390 REFERENCE TO THE ACT SO I DON'T

01:38 - 32.630 THINK THIS

01:38 - 35.450 CRAZY CONFLUENCE OF STATUTES OF

01:38 - 36.750 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY COULD NOT

01:38 - 38.760 POSSIBLY CONCEIVE WHEN THEY

01:38 - 40.350 DRAFTED THESE 2 STATUTES.

01:38 - 41.710 I THINK IS THE NATURAL

01:38 - 43.700 CONSEQUENCE OF VERY CLEAR

01:38 - 46.000 THE LANGUAGE, THE PLACES STRICT

01:38 - 47.390 RULES ON WHAT DRUG DELIVERY

01:38 - 49.240 RESULTING IN DEATH. CAN AND

01:38 - 50.400 CANNOT TO PUNISH.

01:38 - 52.190 >>THANK YOU WELL I.

01:38 - 54.580 >>IF YOU REMEMBER, LET'S JUST

01:38 - 55.010 WATCH.

01:38 - 57.600 THANK YOU CHIEF, NO QUESTIONS

01:38 - 59.750 FOR MISTER MCNEILL. THIS IS

01:38 - 01.510 MONEY. I HAVE

01:39 - 03.940 NO QUESTIONS. THIS IS THERE.

01:39 - 07.830 YOUR NEW MATH.

01:39 - 13.940 AND IT'S

01:39 - 15.580 A GAME. THANK THANK YOU

01:39 - 17.040 JESS IS GONNA LIVE AT GIANTS

01:39 - 22.450 SIGN OR ANY OF MY HAHA I

01:39 - 24.610 APPRECIATE IT. VERY SUMMER

01:39 - 26.960 EVERYBODY ELSE. BUT I DON'T I'M

01:39 - 29.190 A SLOW TO ACCEPT YOUR

01:39 - 32.740 UNDERLYING PREMISE THAT 18

01:39 - 34.760 ONE '02 IS GEORGE

01:39 - 37.240 FICTIONAL STATUTE. THE AND THE

01:39 - 39.610 INTO 9 USUAL CASE IN IN THAT.

01:39 - 41.470 IF YOU LOOK

01:39 - 44.420 AT THE RUG. THE DRUG DEVICE

01:39 - 46.180 COSMETIC ACT AND SAYS IT HAS

01:39 - 46.650 MET WITH

01:39 - 48.790 IN PENNSYLVANIA. UNTIL THEN HE

01:39 - 50.640 BECOMES A DEFINED TERM MAY BE

01:39 - 52.360 AMBIGUOUS TERM UNDER THIS

01:39 - 55.130 UNUSUAL CASE AND AND WHAT I DO

01:39 - 56.480 IS NOT JURISDICTION. ITS

01:39 - 58.980 TERRITORIAL APPLICABILITY IT

01:39 - 01.370 SAYS FOR PURPOSES OF THE CRIMES

01:40 - 01.720 CODE.

01:40 - 05.690 >>IF YOU BUY DRUGS. IN

01:40 - 07.710 ANOTHER STATE, WHICH IS WHAT

01:40 - 08.540 HAPPENED HERE IT CAN BE

01:40 - 09.760 CALIFORNIA, YOU'RE RIGHT.

01:40 - 12.680 B ANYWHERE IT CAN BE A WIFE.

01:40 - 14.670 YOU BUY DRUGS AND OTHER STATE.

01:40 - 17.210 HE COME BACK HERE AND YOU DIE

01:40 - 19.280 HERE THAT THE TERRITORIAL

01:40 - 20.830 APPLICABILITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

01:40 - 22.380 WOULD INCLUDE THAT TRANSACTION.

01:40 - 25.580 IN THE END SEEMS TO LINCHPIN OF

01:40 - 26.710 YOUR CASES THIS ISN'T

01:40 - 28.160 JURISDICTIONAL SECTION. I DON'T

01:40 - 28.970 KNOW WHERE YOU GET THAT.

01:40 - 32.370 WELL I THINK THAT IT'S IT'S A

01:40 - 35.240 VERY GENERAL. IT WAS VERY

01:40 - 35.640 GENTLE

01:40 - 36.240 WITH ABILITY.

01:40 - 38.700 >>IN BACK THROUGHOUT THE BREEZE

01:40 - 40.140 AND I THINK THE PLANS TO RECORD

01:40 - 41.460 IT WAS REFERRED TO AS I

01:40 - 43.110 UNDERSTOOD IT. IF YOU'RE

01:40 - 45.280 A SECTIONAL STEPS YOU KNOW I

01:40 - 46.750 THINK A LOT OF CASES FOR REFER

01:40 - 48.470 TO IT AS SUCH AS WELL NOW WE

01:40 - 49.330 TALKED ABOUT

01:40 - 51.250 IT'S A NEW GENERAL PORTION OF

01:40 - 52.940 THE CRIMES GO TALKING ABOUT

01:40 - 54.330 WINNING THE PROSECUTION CAN BE

01:40 - 55.400 BROUGHT IN PENNSYLVANIA AND

01:40 - 57.370 WHEN THEY CAN'T SO I CERTAINLY

01:40 - 58.950 KNEW IT AS A

01:40 - 01.830 JURISDICTIONAL MATTER. BUT I

01:41 - 04.190 WANT YOU TO ANSWER WHY ISN'T

01:41 - 06.090 THE WORD PENNSYLVANIA UNDER THE

01:41 - 09.100 ADMITTEDLY UNUSUAL. FACTS IN

01:41 - 09.720 THIS CASE.

01:41 - 12.940 >>SUBJECT IN CONSTRUCTION IN

01:41 - 14.290 THE LEGISLATURE, CONSTRUED IT

01:41 - 15.070 MEANT IT IN THE

01:41 - 17.210 TERRITORIAL APPLICABILITY TO

01:41 - 19.060 INCLUDE WHEN SOMEBODY DIES

01:41 - 20.250 WITHIN OUR STATE WHICH

01:41 - 21.500 CERTAINLY OUR LEGISLATURE HAS

01:41 - 23.230 AN INTEREST IN AS A RESULT OF

01:41 - 24.120 DRUGS WHAT ELSE.

01:41 - 27.650 >>I THINK IT DOES INCLUDE I

01:41 - 28.540 THINK THAT I THINK THAT

01:41 - 29.430 INCLUDES

01:41 - 32.680 THE DEATH. HAVING OCCURRED IN

01:41 - 34.170 PENNSYLVANIA BECAUSE THAT MEANS

01:41 - 35.050 ONE OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE

01:41 - 36.450 OFFENSE AND HEARD OCCURRED IN

01:41 - 38.490 PENNSYLVANIA. BUT UNDER THE WAY

01:41 - 40.370 THE ACTORS READING IT'S NOT

01:41 - 41.880 THAT DEATH THIS ROBOT IS THE

01:41 - 44.320 DELIVER IS THE DELIVERY THAT

01:41 - 44.780 OCCURRED

01:41 - 47.840 100% IN MARYLAND AND NOT AT ALL

01:41 - 48.880 WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH OF

01:41 - 49.500 PENNSYLVANIA.

01:41 - 52.110 JUST THE FACT THAT LOOK VERY

01:41 - 53.150 GOOD AT YOU

01:41 - 55.370 GO AHEAD. JUST TO GET BACK TO

01:41 - 56.630 WHAT YOU'RE SAYING WITH THIS IS

01:41 - 58.030 NOT A VIEW WAS SAYING EARLIER

01:41 - 00.250 ABOUT POSSIBLE CONFLICT BETWEEN

01:42 - 01.840 THESE 2 PROVISIONS. I JUST

01:42 - 03.720 THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO

01:42 - 05.510 REMEMBER THAT THAT'S A GENERAL

01:42 - 06.730 PROVISION THAT TALKS ABOUT WHEN

01:42 - 08.410 PROSECUTIONS COULD BE BROAD SO

01:42 - 09.050 BEING YOU

01:42 - 11.190 AT ALL I'M SENSITIVE TO WHICH

01:42 - 12.840 IS GONE AND YOU SAID ABOUT THE

01:42 - 15.270 LANGUAGE REGARDING THE VICTIM.

01:42 - 17.000 BUT I JUST DON'T THINK THAT CAN

01:42 - 18.190 YOU READ IN SUCH A WAY THAT

01:42 - 20.580 SOMEONE ALL OF THE OVERRIDE

01:42 - 22.560 EVERYTHING THAT EACH INDIVIDUAL

01:42 - 24.160 STATUTE MIGHT HAVE TO SAY IN

01:42 - 26.090 SYLVANIA BUT THE OMENS OF IN A

01:42 - 26.810 SENSE.

01:42 - 29.540 CERTAINLY THE FACT THAT SOMEONE

01:42 - 30.910 MAY BE CONVICTED IN

01:42 - 32.170 PENNSYLVANIA WHEN THE

01:42 - 33.540 OVERRIDING NEED TO PROVE THE

01:42 - 34.950 ELEMENTS OF ANOTHER OFFENSE.

01:42 - 35.350 IT'S

01:42 - 38.740 A MURDER. IF THE ODDS OF MURDER

01:42 - 38.970 AND I

01:42 - 40.840 COMPLETELY PROVEN EVEN IF

01:42 - 42.600 SOMEONE MAY BE CONVICTED OF THE

01:42 - 44.250 OFFENSE. THEY WEREN'T CONVICTED

01:42 - 44.610 OF IT.

01:42 - 46.190 IF THERE'S FAILURE PROOF BEYOND

01:42 - 47.110 A REASONABLE DOUBT OF ONE OF

01:42 - 48.420 THE OLD CITY A FACT THAT'S

01:42 - 49.680 EXACTLY WHAT WE HAVE HERE TO

01:42 - 52.790 THE WARNING THE ACT. THANK YOU

01:42 - 53.470 THANK YOU CHIEF.

01:42 - 54.320 >>THANK YOU

01:42 - 58.950 >>ASCOT ON TO IT SEEMS TO ME

01:42 - 01.440 THAT THAT IS SURE.

01:43 - 03.790 ASKED CLEAREST

01:43 - 06.210 ARGUMENT THAT ALTHOUGH YOU MAY

01:43 - 08.460 BE CONVICTED IN MAY NOT BE

01:43 - 10.000 PROSECUTED UNDER THIS

01:43 - 11.360 PARTICULAR STEP IT.

01:43 - 13.840 >>CAUSE THE ELEMENTS. AND YOU

01:43 - 15.470 COULD BE PROSECUTED UNDER OATH.

01:43 - 19.430 SHE SAID. DIVISION.

01:43 - 21.880 I'M SORRY I TALKED OVER THERE.

01:43 - 27.000 >>THANK YOU MISTER A DEAL WE

01:43 - 29.540 UNDERSTAND

01:43 - 34.070 AND WE WILL HEAR

01:43 - 36.230 FROM MATH. THE COMMONWEALTH.

01:43 - 39.750 >>GOOD MORNING, I'M JAMES ACTED

01:43 - 40.720 TOO MUCH ON BEHALF

01:43 - 42.790 OF YOU. THIS CARRIES OFFICE

01:43 - 43.620 BEHALF OF COME WITH

01:43 - 45.410 PENNSYLVANIA, I'M PLEASED THE

01:43 - 45.720 COURT.

01:43 - 49.190 KEY ISSUE IN THIS CASE IS

01:43 - 51.050 APPLICATION OF BE A

01:43 - 53.030 DRUG ACT PREAMBLE PROVISION

01:43 - 54.660 UNDER SUBSECTION BAY WHICH

01:43 - 57.050 PRECEDED ALL THE ACTUAL TRAIN

01:43 - 58.760 BE PROHIBITED VIOLATIONS.

01:43 - 00.800 IT STATES QUOTE THE

01:44 - 03.050 FOLLOWING ACTS AND CAUSING

01:44 - 04.500 THEIR OWN WITHIN THE COMMON LAW

01:44 - 05.630 ARE HEREBY PROHIBITED.

01:44 - 08.230 I WOULD NOTE THAT THIS PREAMBLE

01:44 - 11.470 PROVISION IS NOT REFERRED TO IN

01:44 - 13.180 THE DRUG DELIVERY IN THE.

01:44 - 16.450 THEY DID YARDY STATUTE. DID YOU

01:44 - 19.260 R D STATUTE. SPECIFICALLY YOUR

01:44 - 21.160 FIRST 2 QUOTE SECTION

01:44 - 23.760 1430 OF

01:44 - 24.920 THE ACT. IT DOES NOT

01:44 - 26.480 INCORPORATE ITS PREAMBLE

01:44 - 28.180 PROVISION IF THE PREAMBLE

01:44 - 30.090 PROVISION IS AN ELEMENT OF THE

01:44 - 30.810 FACE OF

01:44 - 32.150 THE OFFENSE. AND THE

01:44 - 34.410 LEGISLATURE HAS EXCLUDED THAT

01:44 - 35.870 PREAMBLE PROVISION FROM BEING

01:44 - 37.150 AN ELEMENT BY NOT INCLUDING IT.

01:44 - 40.460 IT'S A QUESTION OF TERRITORIAL

01:44 - 41.210 CLICK ABILITY.

01:44 - 44.530 PLACEMENT OF EDD RD STATUE IN

01:44 - 47.260 TITLE 18. BECAUSE THE TITLE 18

01:44 - 48.880 TERRITORY APPLICABILITY EAST

01:44 - 51.410 SECTION TO HAVE SUPPRESSED OVER

01:44 - 53.630 BEING DRUG DELIVERY. THE DRUG

01:44 - 56.430 ACT. TERRITORIAL CLICK GO

01:44 - 57.450 DEEPER AFTER A VISION.

01:45 - 04.230 IN ADDITION TO THE TERRITORY UP

01:45 - 05.350 TO THE BOY ARGUMENTS.

01:45 - 09.210 FOR PRESUMING THAT THE DEFENSE

01:45 - 10.560 COUNSEL ARGUED WAS ENTIRELY

01:45 - 12.620 CORRECT. THIS PARTICULAR CASE

01:45 - 13.890 CONTAINS UNIQUE FACTUAL

01:45 - 16.320 ELEMENTS IN THE THIS CASE.

01:45 - 18.280 THE DELIVERY. THE ACTUAL

01:45 - 19.800 TRANSFER GET OCCUR IN MARYLAND.

01:45 - 21.960 HOWEVER, PRIOR TO THE VICTIM

01:45 - 23.410 CONSUMING THE DRUGS. HE

01:45 - 25.560 CONTINUED TO RECEIVE ONGOING

01:45 - 27.550 TECH SUPPORT FROM THE EU FROM

01:45 - 29.560 THE DEFENDANT TEXT HIM HOW TO

01:45 - 29.760 USE

01:45 - 31.620 THE DRUGS. THE VICTIM DIDN'T

01:45 - 33.000 EVEN UNDERSTAND HOW TO USE THE

01:45 - 34.740 TAPE OF HEROIN YOU SO YOU NEED

01:45 - 37.220 TO CONTACT THE SELLER. AND ONCE

01:45 - 38.310 HE WAS TOLD HOW TO SELL IT.

01:45 - 40.470 HOW TO USE IT USED IT AND

01:45 - 42.460 THEN EXPRESSED HOW STRONG WAS

01:45 - 43.820 HOW UNIQUELY STRONG IT WAS.

01:45 - 46.270 THE DETAILS OF THAT ELEMENT OF

01:45 - 47.800 THE BE TEXT MESSAGE TRANSFER OF

01:45 - 48.780 POWER, INCLUDING MY BIRD.

01:45 - 55.400 JUSTICE TANI YOU HAVE ANY

01:45 - 56.670 QUESTIONS. YEAH, YES,

01:45 - 57.090 THEY DO.

01:45 - 59.660 >>ON THE COUNCIL ON BACK TO

01:45 - 02.120 SECTION ONE '02. I WISH

01:46 - 04.550 I'D YOU'RE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND

01:46 - 06.230 THE COURT TO BEAT HER TO BE A

01:46 - 08.460 JURISDICTIONAL ON PROBATION.

01:46 - 09.500 >>ON.

01:46 - 12.700 >>I CALL YOUR ATTENTION TO SOME

01:46 - 14.160 SECTIONS SEX.

01:46 - 19.900 OF ICE ONE '02 OR CSN SECTION

01:46 - 21.750 SEX. AND

01:46 - 23.970 THIS PARTICULAR SUBSECTION.

01:46 - 27.730 APPLY TO A PENNSYLVANIA'S

01:46 - 30.250 STATUTE THAT EXPRESSLY

01:46 - 31.900 PROHIBITS CONDUCT.

01:46 - 34.400 THAT OCCURS OUTSIDE THE COMMON

01:46 - 34.660 LAW.

01:46 - 38.840 AND SO WE HAVE A PROBATION IN

01:46 - 41.200 THE CRIMES CODE IN SECTION ONE

01:46 - 41.840 '02.

01:46 - 44.280 WHERE THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

01:46 - 46.700 ANTICIPATED THAT THERE MAY BE

01:46 - 50.130 A STATUTE. THAT IS EXPRESSLY A

01:46 - 52.500 CLICKABLE TO CONDUCT THAT

01:46 - 54.830 OCCURS OUTSIDE OF PENNSYLVANIA.

01:46 - 58.220 AND THIS STATUE COMES ONLINE IN

01:46 - 01.080 SOME SECTIONS STACKS TO REQUIRE

01:47 - 02.110 THE COURT.

01:47 - 05.280 SHE DO A BALANCING OF INTERESTS

01:47 - 08.760 TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT

01:47 - 10.740 YOU'RE IN SHOULD

01:47 - 13.630 BE EXERCISE UNDER THAT

01:47 - 15.510 PARTICULAR CREATION.

01:47 - 18.540 I FIND IT

01:47 - 21.810 HARD TO GRAPPLE WITH YOUR

01:47 - 23.700 POSITION THAT

01:47 - 27.480 THIS STATUE OVER RI, ANOTHER

01:47 - 29.820 PROVISION OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW

01:47 - 31.920 THAT REQUIRES UNDOCKED THAT

01:47 - 33.760 ACTUALLY OCCURS IN THE

01:47 - 35.330 COMMONWEALTH AND STATE.

01:47 - 37.860 AND COULD YOU HELP ME WITH THAT

01:47 - 40.070 BECAUSE SOME SECTIONS THAT WE

01:47 - 40.600 SLOW

01:47 - 43.080 CAN BE WHEN YOU NEED TO

01:47 - 45.230 RELY ON LINE AT THE GENERAL

01:47 - 47.310 ASSEMBLY WRITTEN THAT IT WAS A

01:47 - 49.110 VIOLATION OF WHY HE STILL

01:47 - 49.830 DRIVES

01:47 - 52.360 ANYWHERE. IN WHICH CASE THE

01:47 - 54.010 TRIAL COURT WOULD HAVE TO SAY

01:47 - 55.470 WHAT BUSINESS IS IT OF

01:47 - 57.100 PENNSYLVANIA TO CONTROL THE

01:47 - 59.860 SALE OF DRIVE ANYWHERE. CAN YOU

01:47 - 00.660 HELP ME WITH THAT.

01:48 - 03.500 YES YOU'RE IN THIS PARTICULAR

01:48 - 06.070 CASE, THE THE DELIVERY OF

01:48 - 09.130 THE DRUGS. IS SIMPLY A MOMENT

01:48 - 10.490 THAT OCCURRED OUTSIDE

01:48 - 11.230 OF PENNSYLVANIA.

01:48 - 12.890 >>THE MEANING CURRY IS

01:48 - 14.940 REGARDING THE HOMICIDE ASPECT

01:48 - 16.110 AND THAT'S WHY WE BELIEVE THAT

01:48 - 18.010 THIS FALLS MORE UNDER A

01:48 - 18.830 GENERAL RULE.

01:48 - 23.110 SUBSECTION ONE 7 AND THE UNI

01:48 - 25.770 LATER IN THE 3RD SECTION 4.

01:48 - 28.620 >>CHECKS YEAH, I UNDERSTAND

01:48 - 30.290 THAT UNITED ANSWERING MY

01:48 - 31.150 QUESTION

01:48 - 32.800 ABOUT IT. THE GENERAL

01:48 - 33.580 ASSEMBLY'S

01:48 - 37.140 ANTICIPATION BATH. I MIGHT

01:48 - 39.240 WRITE A STATUTE THAT COUNTY TO

01:48 - 39.670 BRING IT

01:48 - 41.380 TO BE I'M GOING TO BE CONDUCT

01:48 - 43.420 THAT OCCURRED SOMEWHERE ELSE.

01:48 - 45.870 A PROVISION FOR WHY THE

01:48 - 47.870 TRIAL COURT SUPPOSED TO DO OR

01:48 - 49.440 IN DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT

01:48 - 52.610 THE CASE. I CONTINUE WITHIN

01:48 - 54.050 THAT PARTICULAR COURT OF COMMON

01:48 - 54.640 PLEAS.

01:48 - 57.370 THERE'S NO QUESTION I MEAN I

01:48 - 59.770 THINK YOU YOU YOU AND ME AT

01:48 - 00.260 THAT.

01:49 - 04.430 I'D BE ON I-DRIVE DIED CONTROL

01:49 - 06.450 AFTER THAT WE HAVE A SEAT HERE

01:49 - 08.890 ON SPECIFICALLY REQUIRES

01:49 - 09.790 CONTACT WITHIN THE

01:49 - 10.880 COMMONWEALTH. I MEAN

01:49 - 12.670 THEY COULD THEY COULD STAND IN

01:49 - 14.200 THIS I'D RUN TO LITERALLY

01:49 - 15.720 RESULTING IN DEATH THEY COULD

01:49 - 17.190 NOT REFERRED TO

01:49 - 19.210 ON THAT PARTICULAR PENNSYLVANIA

01:49 - 20.780 STATUTE IN THE HUNDREDS DEAD.

01:49 - 23.380 ANY DRUG DELIVERY THAT RESULTS

01:49 - 24.080 IN DEATH.

01:49 - 27.680 IS ON THIS FIRST DEGREE FELONY

01:49 - 28.800 BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT THE D A.

01:49 - 33.630 >>YOUR OWN IN REGARDS TO THE

01:49 - 35.510 ELEMENT THAT THE DRUG ACT.

01:49 - 37.400 DELIVERY OCCUR IN THE

01:49 - 39.050 COMMONWEALTH. THAT'S NOT

01:49 - 39.910 ENTIRELY

01:49 - 43.250 REPRESENTATION OF WHAT BE A

01:49 - 44.800 SECOND DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE

01:49 - 46.450 COSMETIC ACT ACTUALLY STATES.

01:49 - 48.330 IT SAYS THE FOLLOWING ACTS

01:49 - 50.040 WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH AND THE

01:49 - 51.750 CAUSING THEIR OF WITHIN THE

01:49 - 53.850 COMMENTS. IF THE LEGISLATURE

01:49 - 56.250 HAD PLACED THE DDR THE STATUTE

01:49 - 59.220 INTO TITLE 35 NEED THE DRUG THE

01:49 - 59.760 DRUG ACT.

01:50 - 02.460 SOME AT LET'S SAY THEY PLACED

01:50 - 04.200 AT THE END I BELIEVE SUBSECTION

01:50 - 06.370 40 IS STILL OPEN. IT'S A PLACE

01:50 - 08.490 IN SUBSECTION 40. THE FACT THAT

01:50 - 10.390 THE DEATHS OCCURRED IN

01:50 - 12.410 PENNSYLVANIA. IF THE DELIVERY

01:50 - 14.280 STILL HAPPENED IN MARYLAND.

01:50 - 16.470 AND IT WAS UNDER THIS TEST.

01:50 - 18.810 ACTS AND THE CAUSING THEIR OF

01:50 - 20.490 WITHIN THE COMMON LAW. THE

01:50 - 21.910 CAUSE OF THE DEATH WITHIN THE

01:50 - 23.000 COMMONWEALTH WOULD HAVE

01:50 - 25.320 SATISFIED. THE STATUTE EVEN IF

01:50 - 26.360 IT WAS ENTIRELY UNDER

01:50 - 26.890 THE DRUG.

01:50 - 29.220 >>AND THEY COUNCIL THE COUNCIL

01:50 - 30.570 OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE TO

01:50 - 32.240 BACK DOESN'T DEAL WITH YEAH.

01:50 - 34.930 THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT

01:50 - 35.930 IN THE SECTION THAT YOU'RE

01:50 - 37.680 REFERRING TO REVERSE YOU'VE

01:50 - 37.820 BEEN

01:50 - 39.470 FOLLOWING APP LET'S JUST SAY

01:50 - 41.760 THE DELIVERY OF DRUGS IN

01:50 - 43.300 CAUSING THE AIR ON WITHIN THE

01:50 - 45.230 COMMONWEALTH WHICH WOULD BE THE

01:50 - 46.710 DELIVERY OF DRUGS WITHIN

01:50 - 49.240 THE COMMONWEALTH, A STATUE THAT

01:50 - 50.960 IS ONE OF THE PREDICATE FOR THE

01:50 - 52.950 PROSECUTION UNDER THE GENTLE

01:50 - 53.900 LIVERY RESULTING

01:50 - 56.280 IN DEATH. THIS PARTICULAR PARTY

01:50 - 57.800 THAT ONLY DEALS WITH THE

01:50 - 58.920 DELIVERY SHOT.

01:51 - 02.040 >>THAT'S CORRECT YOUR HONOR

01:51 - 03.590 AND WHEN THE TRIAL COURT DID

01:51 - 05.130 ITS VALUE TO ASIAN AS TO

01:51 - 05.740 WHETHER OR NOT

01:51 - 09.060 JURISDICTION EXISTED. EVALUATED

01:51 - 10.650 THE STEP THE DRUG DELIVERY

01:51 - 11.830 RESULTING IN DEATH STATUTE AS A

01:51 - 13.480 WHOLE AND FOCUSED ON THE FACT

01:51 - 15.270 THAT THE QUESTION OF WHETHER AN

01:51 - 16.700 ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE. IT

01:51 - 18.540 OCCUR IN PENNSYLVANIA. THE FACT

01:51 - 18.920 THAT THEY

01:51 - 20.820 THE DEATH AND IT'S BASICALLY A

01:51 - 21.860 CONTROVERSY THAT THE DEATH

01:51 - 22.300 OCCURRED

01:51 - 24.390 IN PENNSYLVANIA. THE DEATH

01:51 - 26.420 BEING THE MORE SERIOUS ASPECT

01:51 - 27.960 OF THIS OFFENSE THAT YOU NEED

01:51 - 28.980 TO COUNSEL YOU NEED

01:51 - 30.260 BOTH HEARTS.

01:51 - 33.150 >>BE KIND TO DELIVERY RESULTING

01:51 - 35.500 IN DEATH STATUTE GET YOURSELF

01:51 - 36.590 A CONVICTION.

01:51 - 38.660 >>AND THE FIRST IS A VIOLATION

01:51 - 39.280 OF THE CONTROLLED

01:51 - 41.850 SUBSTANCES ACT. WE DO THAT

01:51 - 43.770 WHICH REQUIRES IT TO OCCUR IN

01:51 - 44.480 THE COMMONWEALTH.

01:51 - 47.560 WE ARE AT AS THE STATUE OR

01:51 - 48.590 FIRST THE CONTROLLED

01:51 - 49.500 SUBSTANCES ACT.

01:51 - 51.470 >>THE DRUG DELIVERY RESULTING

01:51 - 52.420 IN DEATH STATUTE DOES NOT

01:51 - 54.330 INCORPORATE REQUIREMENT THAT

01:51 - 55.460 THE DELIVERY OF CURRENT

01:51 - 56.880 PENNSYLVANIA, EVERYTHING THAT

01:51 - 58.720 IS EXCLUDED FROM THE DRUG

01:51 - 59.850 DELIVERY RESULTING IN DEATH

01:51 - 01.430 STATUTE NOW I'VE GOT NO DOES

01:52 - 02.790 NOT COUNT I MEAN UNLESS I'M

01:52 - 04.360 MISSING SOMETHING EACH AND

01:52 - 05.790 EVERY RESULTING IN DEATH

01:52 - 08.750 REQUIRES A VIOLATION OF THE

01:52 - 10.850 CONTROL OFFENSE INTO THAT LIFE

01:52 - 11.250 AGAIN.

01:52 - 14.980 IT REQUIRES A VIOLATION OF

01:52 - 17.970 THAT CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.

01:52 - 21.030 YES, YOUR WHAT IT REQUIRES A

01:52 - 22.490 VIOLATION OF THAT PROVISION,

01:52 - 24.140 THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.

01:52 - 26.630 TO THAT AND BECOME A LITTLE

01:52 - 27.930 TOUGHER TO ITS BRIEF COME ALL

01:52 - 30.410 FORCES GERALD AND THE FEDERAL

01:52 - 32.830 CASE IS PURE BETWEEN A

01:52 - 34.470 VIOLATION IS NOT SYNONYMOUS

01:52 - 36.090 WITH CONVICTION. AND DOES NOT

01:52 - 37.320 REQUIRE EVEN THE ABILITY TO

01:52 - 38.260 OBTAIN A CONVICTION.

01:52 - 40.680 IN GENERAL A DEFENDANT WAS

01:52 - 42.450 CHARGED WITH POSSESSION OF

01:52 - 44.110 CONTRABAND INTO PRISON OR

01:52 - 45.110 POSSESSING A SMALL AMOUNT OF

01:52 - 47.030 MARIJUANA. EITHER THE

01:52 - 48.940 CONTRABAND STATUE DOES NOT

01:52 - 50.300 INCLUDE SMALL AMOUNT OF

01:52 - 51.640 MARIJUANA AS AN OFFENSE TO

01:52 - 53.750 WHICH THAT WOULD INVOKE BE.

01:52 - 56.030 THE CONTRABAND PURRS PROVISION

01:52 - 58.260 GENERALLY POSSESSION OF

01:52 - 59.490 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE TEST.

01:52 - 01.080 NOW IT'S ON POSSESSES A SMALL

01:53 - 02.770 AMOUNT OF MARIJUANA IN THEORY.

01:53 - 04.230 IT COULD ALSO VIOLATE

01:53 - 06.790 THE POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED

01:53 - 09.190 SUBSTANCE STATUTE. HOWEVER, AND

01:53 - 10.360 ARE CONSIDERING A CASE LAW.

01:53 - 12.170 IF YOU VIOLATE SMALL AMOUNT

01:53 - 14.160 YOU'RE NOT TO BE CONVICTED OF

01:53 - 16.430 THE IN THE HIGHER FENCE OF

01:53 - 17.650 POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED

01:53 - 19.510 SUBSTANCE. THEREFORE WHILE IT

01:53 - 19.970 UNDER.

01:53 - 22.380 GARY. WELL WHILE IT'S

01:53 - 24.050 IMPOSSIBLE FOR AN INDIVIDUAL

01:53 - 25.050 POSSESSING A SMALL AMOUNT OF

01:53 - 26.390 MARIJUANA TO BE CONVICTED

01:53 - 28.710 OF SIMPLE POSSESSION UNDER

01:53 - 30.200 SECTION 14 OF THE DRUG ACT.

01:53 - 33.800 IT'S OFFICIAL OR CHARACTER FOR

01:53 - 34.940 THIS TYPE OF SITUATION.

01:53 - 37.550 THE VIOLATION ISN'T THE

01:53 - 39.630 VIOLATION ELEMENT IS MET NOT

01:53 - 40.660 NOT THAT CONVICTION CAN

01:53 - 43.030 BE OBTAINED. BUT AT YOUR

01:53 - 44.820 ACCOUNTS SO WE'LL MOVE ON TO

01:53 - 46.270 SOME OF THE OTHER JUSTICES MAY

01:53 - 47.000 HAVE QUESTIONS.

01:53 - 48.990 >>WE'LL TURN YOU ADJUST

01:53 - 49.560 DAUGHERTY.

01:53 - 53.100 >>I GAIN RISK MY QUESTION.

01:53 - 55.020 GOOD GOOD AFTERNOON.

01:53 - 56.620 >>I WANT MY QUESTION IS A

01:53 - 58.850 FOLLOW-UP OF JUST A STUNNING.

01:53 - 01.990 A VIOLATION OF THE CONTROLLED

01:54 - 02.660 SUBSTANCE.

01:54 - 06.060 IS AN ESSENTIAL ELEMENT IN THE

01:54 - 08.070 DRUG DELIVERY RESULTING IN

01:54 - 10.100 DEATH. THE VIOLATION OF THE

01:54 - 11.970 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ACT IS

01:54 - 13.880 GEOGRAPHICALLY RESTRICTED TO

01:54 - 14.740 THE COMMON.

01:54 - 19.280 HOW DO YOU JUSTIFY. I'M HAVING

01:54 - 21.630 A VIOLATION WITH A

01:54 - 23.540 AND B CONFINES OF THE

01:54 - 24.380 GEOGRAPHICAL

01:54 - 26.580 COMMON WELL TO SOME WHO ARE

01:54 - 28.240 YOUR CONVICTION FOR DRUG

01:54 - 29.740 DELIVERY RESULTING IN DEATH.

01:54 - 35.160 >>THE WAY THAT THIS CAN TAKE

01:54 - 36.880 YOUR STATUTES RAIN AS I'VE

01:54 - 37.990 MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY THIS

01:54 - 39.910 STATUE DOES NOT INCORPORATE

01:54 - 41.620 THE TERRITORIAL PUT ABILITY

01:54 - 43.280 PRESENT PROVISION OF THE DRUG

01:54 - 44.690 ACT AND THEREFORE IT SHOULD

01:54 - 45.760 DEFAULT TO THE TERRITORIAL

01:54 - 47.410 CLICK BELIEBERS A POSITION OF

01:54 - 49.720 TITLE 18. HOWEVER, TO GET MORE

01:54 - 50.840 DIRECTLY TO ANSWER THIS

01:54 - 52.930 QUESTION. WHEN AN INDIVIDUAL.

01:54 - 55.340 LET'S SAY APPLYING THE

01:54 - 57.070 SAME STATUTE. LET'S SAY YOU'RE

01:54 - 59.500 A BUT ONLINE PHARMACY IN

01:54 - 01.590 ANOTHER STATE. OR A

01:55 - 03.290 DISTRIBUTOR. LIVERS A.

01:55 - 05.610 AMOUNT OF A CONTROLLED

01:55 - 07.500 SUBSTANCE TO FARSI JUST ACROSS

01:55 - 09.370 THE LINE IN MARYLAND. LET'S SAY

01:55 - 11.560 THAT THEY'VE AND ONLY PURCHASED

01:55 - 13.380 A BULK OF CONTRABAND CONTROLLED

01:55 - 14.780 SUBSTANCE WHICH FALLS UNDER

01:55 - 15.220 ACTOR.

01:55 - 18.070 A PERSON IN PENNSYLVANIA DRIVES

01:55 - 19.120 ACROSS THE BORDER TO THEIR

01:55 - 20.370 NEAREST PHARMACY IN MARYLAND,

01:55 - 22.610 I'S THE DRUGS THAT THEY BELIEVE

01:55 - 23.880 THAT THEY ARE ABLE TO GET WITH

01:55 - 24.490 A PRESCRIPTION

01:55 - 26.390 COMES HOME AND TAKING THIS

01:55 - 27.630 COULD COUNTERFEIT CONTROLLED

01:55 - 29.890 SUBSTANCE. ALL RIGHT. I THINK

01:55 - 31.000 IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE

01:55 - 32.490 COMMONWEALTH TO BE ABLE TO GO

01:55 - 33.520 AFTER THE INDIVIDUAL.

01:55 - 35.690 THEY. CAUSE THIS CONTROLLED

01:55 - 36.770 SUBSTANCE WAS COUNTERFEIT

01:55 - 37.730 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE IN THIS

01:55 - 39.010 CASE. STILL UNDER THE SAME

01:55 - 40.980 SUBSECTION SECTION 30 OF THE

01:55 - 42.300 DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE KOZNICK

01:55 - 42.470 AT.

01:55 - 44.970 IT COULD BE SUBJECT TO

01:55 - 45.950 PROSECUTION TO CAUSING THE

01:55 - 46.320 DEATH.

01:55 - 48.160 >>COUNCIL JUST HYPOTHETICALLY

01:55 - 48.600 SPEAKING.

01:55 - 51.560 THE VIOLATION OF SECTION 13 AID

01:55 - 52.930 WOULD YOU LOOK VERY THAT WOULD

01:55 - 55.120 IN WHO IS ACTUALLY CORRECT IF

01:55 - 56.060 I'M NOT MISTAKEN.

01:55 - 58.210 >>A SIMPLE POSSESSION UNDER 14,

01:55 - 58.560 YES.

01:55 - 00.820 >>NOW MY UNDERSTANDING BASED

01:56 - 02.270 UPON THESE FACTS IS THAT HER

01:56 - 04.260 WHEN HER WE HAVE ARE WHEN WAS

01:56 - 05.920 FOUND ON THE TABLE.

01:56 - 08.810 >>ON THE NIGHT STAND WHEN HE.

01:56 - 10.230 WHEN THEY FOUND THE BODY.

01:56 - 15.560 SO HAD YOU CHARGE HIM WITH

01:56 - 16.460 POSSESSION.

01:56 - 18.600 AT THAT TIME AS OPPOSED TO

01:56 - 19.710 DELIVERY FOR WHICH WAS

01:56 - 21.430 DISTRAUGHT WOULD THAT NOT HAVE

01:56 - 22.660 BEEN MUCH STRONGER CASE FOR THE

01:56 - 24.640 COM. WELL BECAUSE IN FACT HE

01:56 - 25.500 COULD HAVE BEEN

01:56 - 27.350 CONVICTED OF VIOLATION AND

01:56 - 28.640 POSSESSION DESPITE THE FACT

01:56 - 30.580 THAT HE'S DEAD. AS OPPOSED

01:56 - 32.510 TO DELIVERY. WHEN YOU SAY

01:56 - 33.880 VIOLATION WHERE IS THE

01:56 - 36.140 VIOLATION WITH IN. THE

01:56 - 37.710 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ACT WITHIN

01:56 - 38.380 YOUR BACK.

01:56 - 41.250 >>THE OWNER OF THE VIOLATION IS

01:56 - 42.380 THE DELIVERY OF CONTROLLED

01:56 - 44.340 SUBSTANCE AND CAUSING THE

01:56 - 45.570 DELIVERY TO OCCUR WITHIN

01:56 - 47.340 PENNSYLVANIA. NOW IN THIS CASE,

01:56 - 48.590 THE AND THE VICTIM

01:56 - 50.620 IN THERE. HE PURCHASED AT THE

01:56 - 51.960 DEFENDANT'S HOUSE WHICH IS JUST

01:56 - 53.040 ACROSS THE LINE IN MARYLAND.

01:56 - 55.190 IN RETURN HOME. IN THIS

01:56 - 56.340 PARTICULAR CASE WE HAVE THE

01:56 - 57.530 BONUS INFORMATION OF

01:56 - 00.250 THE VICTIM HAVING TO CONTACT

01:57 - 01.960 THE DEFENDANT TO OBTAIN THE

01:57 - 03.170 INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE THIS

01:57 - 03.630 TAPE OF

01:57 - 05.930 OF HEROIN. BASICALLY THIS

01:57 - 07.230 VICTIM HE ONLY USED THE

01:57 - 08.640 POWDERED HEROIN INSERTED

01:57 - 11.250 THIS TYPE WERE GREAT, YOU KNOW

01:57 - 13.060 YOUR THE FACT YOU CAN TELL SO.

01:57 - 14.390 >>WE'RE TRYING TO GET TO THE

01:57 - 15.460 HEART OF THE MATTER AND

01:57 - 17.730 I'M GOING TO ASK JUSTICE WORK

01:57 - 20.850 TO BE AS YOU QUESTION. YOU JUST

01:57 - 24.300 THIS MORNING COUNCIL. I I HAVE

01:57 - 24.970 A BOMB

01:57 - 27.330 QUESTIONS ABOUT SEVERAL OF YOUR

01:57 - 28.870 ARGUMENTS WILL TRY TO CONFINE

01:57 - 29.790 THEM TO A COUPLE.

01:57 - 33.340 >>IS YOUR ARGUMENT THAT EVEN

01:57 - 34.000 THOUGH.

01:57 - 37.180 THE ACTIVE DELIVERY OCCURRED IN

01:57 - 40.160 MARYLAND. BECAUSE THERE WERE.

01:57 - 42.580 >>TEXT MESSAGES BETWEEN A

01:57 - 44.470 PENNSYLVANIA AND MARYLAND ARE.

01:57 - 46.610 >>QUALIFY SOMEHOW FOR THE

01:57 - 47.210 STATUE.

01:57 - 50.120 THAT'S ONE

01:57 - 51.270 ARGUMENT TO MEET YOUR OWN OR

01:57 - 52.650 THAT'S NOT MY PRIMARY ARGUMENT

01:57 - 54.030 BUT THAT IS ONE ARGUMENT THAT

01:57 - 54.710 CAN BE MADE.

01:57 - 56.260 >>AND SO THEN.

01:57 - 59.090 YOU'RE YOU'RE SAYING THAT THE

01:57 - 00.470 REACH OF THE STATUE.

01:58 - 01.840 >>WELL.

01:58 - 05.310 >>ENCOMPASS.

01:58 - 07.650 ANYTHING OCCURRING ANYWHERE

01:58 - 08.940 OUTSIDE OF PENNSYLVANIA.

01:58 - 11.110 SO LONG AS IN PENNSYLVANIA IS

01:58 - 13.660 TEXTING WITH SOMEBODY OUTSIDE

01:58 - 14.380 OF OUR BORDERS.

01:58 - 17.000 IF THAT TEXTING RESULT IN THE

01:58 - 18.070 DEATH OF THE PENNSYLVANIA

01:58 - 19.440 WITHIN THE STATE OF THE

01:58 - 20.510 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

01:58 - 21.480 ARGUABLY YES.

01:58 - 23.060 >>SHOULD YOU GO TO THE GENERAL

01:58 - 24.380 ASSEMBLY TO ASK THEM TO REWRITE

01:58 - 25.620 THE STATUTE INSTEAD OF COMING

01:58 - 26.080 TO US.

01:58 - 29.250 >>IF I HAD DONE SO YOUR HONOR I

01:58 - 30.270 BELIEVE THEY WOULD HAVE HAD THE

01:58 - 31.290 RIGHT THE STATUTE, THE WAY IT'S

01:58 - 33.210 CURRENTLY WRITTEN. ALL RIGHT

01:58 - 34.420 AND WITH REGARD TO THE WAY IT

01:58 - 34.510 IS

01:58 - 36.490 CURRENTLY WRITTEN YOU WANT US

01:58 - 40.350 TO READ SUBSECTIONS 1430.

01:58 - 46.450 SESSIONS 7 8113 WITHOUT.

01:58 - 47.520 SOME

01:58 - 50.620 HOW DO WE MAKE SENSE OF A CALL

01:58 - 52.590 OF A CLAUSE WITHOUT THE ARM

01:58 - 54.040 WITHOUT ITS BEGINNING.

01:58 - 56.430 THE HONORED BECAUSE THE

01:58 - 57.930 LEGISLATURE SPECIFICALLY DID

01:58 - 58.670 NOT INCLUDE THAT

01:58 - 00.730 BEGINNING SECTION. THE FALL THE

01:59 - 01.910 FOLLOWING ACTS AND CAUSING

01:59 - 02.890 THERE WITH A COUPLE OTHER

01:59 - 04.760 THEREBY APPROPRIATE THAT

01:59 - 06.070 PARTICULAR LANGUAGE IS SIMPLY

01:59 - 08.150 NOT INCLUDED. WE DON'T BELIEVE

01:59 - 09.950 IN THE DRUG DELIVERY STATUTES

01:59 - 10.240 ARE.

01:59 - 14.080 AFTER THE 13 YOU SEE THE THE

01:59 - 16.180 SUBSECTION A DON'T YES, YES,

01:59 - 18.270 YOU'RE RIGHT. THOUGH GIVEN THAT

01:59 - 20.180 YOU SEE THE SUBSECTION A THERE

01:59 - 22.850 IS A NONSENSICAL BARR ABOUT

01:59 - 25.830 1430. WITHOUT THEIR CALL OUT

01:59 - 26.940 CLAUSE IN A.

01:59 - 29.270 NO YOUR HONOR IN FACT I WOULD

01:59 - 30.810 ARGUE IT'S NECESSARY THE WAY

01:59 - 32.120 THAT THIS PARTICULAR STATUTE AS

01:59 - 33.640 WRITTEN. IT SPECIFICALLY

01:59 - 35.760 EXCLUDES PREAMBLE PROVISION,

01:59 - 37.180 THE PREAMBLE PROVISION IS AN

01:59 - 37.670 ELEMENT OF

01:59 - 39.620 THE OFFENSE. IT'S A JUROR'S IT

01:59 - 41.050 OR TO PUT THE BILLING IT IT'S

01:59 - 42.620 THE EQUIVALENT OF SECTION ONE

01:59 - 44.820 '02 OF TACKLING TEAM ONLY

01:59 - 46.440 APPLIES TO THE DRUG ACT BECAUSE

01:59 - 48.910 SECTION ONE OR 2 ONLY APPLYING

01:59 - 49.870 TO TELL THE TEAM WOULD NOT HAVE

01:59 - 50.970 APPLIED TO THE DRUG ACT ON ITS

01:59 - 53.540 OWN. NO FURTHER QUESTIONS.

01:59 - 57.660 >>ALMOST OUT OF TIME BUT DAD.

01:59 - 59.760 AND WE HAVE GOT.

02:00 - 03.770 WE ASKED JUST AS MONDAY SHOWS

02:00 - 04.910 ANY QUESTION YOU BEFORE WE

02:00 - 05.800 CONCLUDE.

02:00 - 08.900 >>AND NO QUESTIONS

02:00 - 11.350 THANK YOU. THEY WERE DOWN TO 2

02:00 - 13.810 MINUTES JUST TO SPARE. NO

02:00 - 15.060 QUESTIONS. THANK YOU CHIEF.

02:00 - 16.800 THAT'S JUST TIRED.

02:00 - 21.140 YES CHIEF JUST ONE QUICK

02:00 - 22.080 QUESTION.

02:00 - 24.450 >>THE COMMON WHILE THIS IS

02:00 - 27.050 UNDOUBTEDLY A TRAGIC CASE AND I

02:00 - 29.290 I AGREE WITH YOU COMPLETELY IN

02:00 - 31.150 THAT IT WOULD BE IN THE

02:00 - 32.730 INTEREST OF THE CAR AND WHILE

02:00 - 34.410 TO BE ABLE TO PROSECUTE.

02:00 - 36.620 THIS CASE. THE

02:00 - 39.310 PROBLEM IS PROSECUTING THIS

02:00 - 41.100 CASE IN THE MAY ENTER THAT IT

02:00 - 43.790 WAS CHARGED, DOES NOT SEEM TO

02:00 - 45.590 ME TO BE POSSIBLE UNDER THIS

02:00 - 47.860 STATUTE AND I'LL JUST GIVE YOU

02:00 - 50.270 ONE LAST CHANCE TO TELL ME I'M

02:00 - 50.670 WRONG.

02:00 - 56.130 >>THIS PARTICULAR STATUE

02:00 - 57.780 SIMPLY DOESN'T INCLUDE BEAT HER

02:00 - 59.640 TO A QUICK BILLY PROVISIONS OF

02:00 - 01.590 A DRUG DELIVERY DEVICES AS NECK

02:01 - 01.900 AND ACT

02:01 - 03.130 IF YOU ACTUALLY APPLY TO

02:01 - 04.610 STATUTES THAT ARE SET FORTH

02:01 - 07.320 ENTIRELY OF THE DRUG IN DRUG

02:01 - 08.360 DELIVERY RESULTING IN DEATH

02:01 - 09.860 STATUTE. THAT

02:01 - 11.360 A DELIVERY OCCURRED THE

02:01 - 12.410 DELIVERY WAS A CONTROLLED

02:01 - 13.610 SUBSTANCE AND THEN A DEATH

02:01 - 15.800 OCCURRED THAT COME WITH HAS MET

02:01 - 16.240 ITS BURDEN.

02:01 - 18.470 IN THAT THE ELEMENT OF DEATH

02:01 - 19.130 HAVING OCCURRED

02:01 - 20.850 IN PENNSYLVANIA, SATISFIED THE

02:01 - 21.990 TERRITORIAL CLICK THE BODY

02:01 - 23.320 PROVISIONS OF SECTION ONE '02.

02:01 - 25.470 NOW IF THE.

02:01 - 28.270 UNDER SANCTIONS WERE EXPANDED

02:01 - 29.430 THERE'S ARGUMENTS

02:01 - 32.830 THAT BE FOR THE DEFENDANTS OWN

02:01 - 34.240 WRATH CATION HE'S CONTINUING

02:01 - 36.450 SERVICE OF THE TRANSACTION IN

02:01 - 37.640 PENNSYLVANIA AND THE DEFENDANT

02:01 - 38.400 WHEN THE VICTIM WAS AT

02:01 - 40.370 HIS HOUSE THAT COULD ALSO BE

02:01 - 41.760 ARGUED SAYS FIGHTERS IN THIS

02:01 - 44.710 PARTICULAR CASE. BUT GENERALLY

02:01 - 45.580 SPEAKING YOUR HONOR

02:01 - 47.310 I BELIEVE THAT BEAT HER TO PUT

02:01 - 48.430 THE BILL THE PROVISION OF ONE

02:01 - 48.950 '02.

02:01 - 51.780 18, YOU HAVE TRACY FOR ANY

02:01 - 53.020 OFFENSE INTEGRITY.

02:01 - 56.410 THANK YOU THANK YOU BOTH

02:01 - 57.820 COUNCIL AND THAT WILL CONCLUDE

02:01 - 01.020 >>THE CORPS WILL RECESS TILL

02:02 - 06.010 >>FOCUS ON AGING ADULTS IN

02:02 - 09.440 BRINGS YOU A MONTHLY PANEL

02:02 - 12.720 PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES.

02:02 - 16.530 COMMUNITIES AND MORE

02:02 - 21.150 IMPORTANT TO SENIORS FOCUS ON

02:02 - 26.350 ON PCN VISIT PCN TV DOT COM FOR

02:02 - 29.270 THE UPCOMING SCHEDULE.

02:02 - 32.840 TO YOU.

02:02 - 35.870 >>COURT IS BACK IN SESSION THE

02:02 - 37.520 NEXT SEGMENT IS IN THE MATTER

02:02 - 38.990 OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

02:02 - 40.940 VERSUS MICHAEL A LAYMAN AND

02:02 - 41.270 SCOTT

02:02 - 43.370 CHARLES DAVIS REPRESENTING COME

02:02 - 44.830 OFF JAMES ZAHN

02:02 - 46.790 TOLD WHICH REPRESENTING SCOTT

02:02 - 48.340 CHARLES DAVIS IS A TURNING

02:02 - 50.390 MARK LIPPMAN REPRESENTING

02:02 - 52.490 MICHAEL A LEHMAN IS A TRADE WAR

02:02 - 53.060 YOST.

02:02 - 56.770 GOOD AFTERNOON. I'M NOT.

02:02 - 59.170 PLEASE REACH CONVICTED AND

02:02 - 00.750 SENTENCED TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT.

02:03 - 03.730 URGED ME WHEN THEY WERE JUBA.

02:03 - 06.610 POLICE TO

02:03 - 08.760 RE SENTENCE AFTER A MANDATORY

02:03 - 09.910 LIFE PRISON TERMS FOR

02:03 - 11.960 JUVENILES. WE'RE DECLARING

02:03 - 14.640 UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AS PART OF

02:03 - 14.920 THE NEW

02:03 - 17.800 7 C. THE TRIAL COURT ORDERED

02:03 - 19.130 POLICE TO PAY THE COSTS

02:03 - 21.960 ASSOCIATED WITH $0.3 E C.

02:03 - 25.020 THE SUPREME COURT VACATED THE

02:03 - 25.910 COST WORSE

02:03 - 28.240 NEW YORKERS. THE CONCLUDING

02:03 - 29.560 THAT TRIAL COURTS LACKED

02:03 - 31.660 THE AUTHORITY REQUIRE THE

02:03 - 33.750 PAYMENT OF THE COSTS FOR REAL

02:03 - 35.850 WORRY SENTENCING WHEN AN

02:03 - 37.460 ILLEGAL SENTENCE HAD BEEN SET

02:03 - 39.890 ASIDE. THE COMMONWEALTH BE

02:03 - 43.830 CHALLENGING THAT. HE. BEGIN

02:03 - 44.520 YOUR ARGUMENT.

02:03 - 47.500 PLEASE THE COURT AND IN MY NAME

02:03 - 49.120 IS JAMES HIM TO BE TRIPS INCOME

02:03 - 50.960 WILL ANSWER A NEW INDUSTRIES

02:03 - 53.110 OFFICE. THE

02:03 - 55.590 THE CALLS ARE DONE IN THIS CASE

02:03 - 57.000 IS PRETTY CLEAR WHERE OUR

02:03 - 58.290 POSITION IS THAT THE SPEAR

02:03 - 58.660 COURT.

02:03 - 00.620 >>EXCEEDED THE EXISTING CASE

02:04 - 00.740 LAW

02:04 - 02.700 OF PENNSYLVANIA. THIS THE

02:04 - 04.120 ATMOSPHERE CORIN THERE PANEL

02:04 - 06.050 OPINIONS DECIDED TO COME OVER

02:04 - 07.690 SAYS WEAVER PAY SCREAM COURT

02:04 - 09.470 CASE KAMEL FORCES GUARDING

02:04 - 12.130 THEM. MAYBE THERE ARE THEIR

02:04 - 13.910 POSITION THAT IT WAS ISSUE OF

02:04 - 15.890 COSTS IN A RECENT STING IS

02:04 - 16.960 SIMPLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

02:04 - 18.670 THE COMMONWEALTH HAS REVIEWED

02:04 - 19.860 THESE CASES THAT WERE SAYING TO

02:04 - 21.580 BUY THE SPEAR COURT AND THAT IS

02:04 - 22.670 NOT WHAT THESE CASES STAND FOR

02:04 - 23.030 IT ALL.

02:04 - 27.350 GARZON SPECIFICALLY THE SPEAR

02:04 - 29.380 COURT HELD THAT WHERE A TRIAL

02:04 - 30.400 COURT MAKES A FACTUAL

02:04 - 31.770 DETERMINATION. AT THE

02:04 - 33.250 COMMONWEALTH HAS ACTED IN BAD

02:04 - 35.850 FAITH OR ENGAGE US IN EAST.

02:04 - 38.810 AND THAT IT IS WITHIN THE TRIAL

02:04 - 41.340 DISCRETION TO NOT

02:04 - 43.580 IMPOSE COSTS REGARDING THAT WE

02:04 - 44.710 STIR MALFEASANCE APPOINT A

02:04 - 46.850 DEFENDANT. TO THAT IN THE

02:04 - 48.010 COMMONWEALTH HAS NO OBJECTION

02:04 - 49.620 TO THE IMPOSITION OF LEVER IN

02:04 - 51.210 OUR ZONE THAT SEEMS LIKE A

02:04 - 52.590 COMPLETELY REASONABLE POSITION.

02:04 - 56.060 IT'S THE BARRING OF TRIAL

02:04 - 57.320 COUNSEL FROM IMPOSING

02:04 - 59.290 COSTS REGARDING RECENT SING

02:04 - 00.110 THAT BECOME DIS

02:05 - 03.010 AGREES WITH. RESEARCH CASE LAW

02:05 - 04.640 UNITED STATES IN AS WELL AS

02:05 - 06.560 PENNSYLVANIA WHO DO NOT APPEAR

02:05 - 06.620 TO

02:05 - 08.730 BE ANY CASE ON AT LEAST THIS

02:05 - 09.800 OFFICE WAS ABLE TO FIND IN

02:05 - 12.900 SUPPORT OF THE POSITION THAT

02:05 - 14.820 IT SIMPLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

02:05 - 17.270 IMPLYING THE U.S. SUPREME COURT

02:05 - 18.450 CASE LAW THAT EXISTS.

02:05 - 21.510 THE TEST AND THEN IS SET FORTH

02:05 - 23.520 IN GRIFFIN VERY PERSON OWN WAY.

02:05 - 26.430 U.S. SUPREME COURT. 3, 5, ONE

02:05 - 29.450 US 1219 56. HE SAID THAT THE

02:05 - 31.160 TEST FOR IMPOSITION OF COST AND

02:05 - 33.500 FEES. THE TEST AND RATIONALITY

02:05 - 34.730 AND THAT STATES NEED FOR

02:05 - 36.120 REVENUE TO OFFSET COSTS

02:05 - 38.030 GENERALLY SATISFIED THE REST OF

02:05 - 39.940 YOUR CAR. WE WOULD

02:05 - 41.850 AGREE THAT THERE'S ACTION

02:05 - 44.060 AND WEAVER. OUR TEST OF

02:05 - 45.520 RATIONALITY IS A RATIONAL TO

02:05 - 48.120 IMPOSE A COST WHERE THE COST

02:05 - 50.330 HAS BEEN CAUSED BY CANDLES IN A

02:05 - 51.480 FEE AND SNOW THAT IS NOW

02:05 - 53.320 RATIONAL REASONABLE IN THIS

02:05 - 55.530 CASE. WE HAVE 2 JUVENILE LIFERS

02:05 - 58.910 WHO WE'RE REQUIRED TO BE RECENT

02:05 - 00.070 THEIR SENTENCES WERE VACATED

02:06 - 01.420 THEREFORE THEY WERE EXISTING IN

02:06 - 02.820 A SITUATION WHERE THERE WAS NO

02:06 - 03.910 SENSE THEREFORE THEIR

02:06 - 05.110 CONVICTIONS ARE NOT FINAL AT

02:06 - 05.950 THE TIME THAT WE HAD YOU

02:06 - 08.470 SENSING HERE. WE DID

02:06 - 09.520 THE EVALUATIONS

02:06 - 11.970 AND IN THESE 2 CASES THAT ARE

02:06 - 13.810 CONTESTED HEARINGS AND DEFENSE

02:06 - 15.580 COUNSEL PRESENTED THEIR EXPERTS

02:06 - 18.610 WHICH WE SAY TO IN OUR GRIEF AS

02:06 - 19.870 TO WHAT WAS BEING

02:06 - 22.620 REQUESTED AB. PERCENT BOTH THE

02:06 - 24.090 DEFENSE EXPERTS WERE SAYING

02:06 - 25.380 THAT THE JUVENILE SHOULD HAVE

02:06 - 27.090 LESS TIME MCCONNELL'S EXPERT

02:06 - 28.200 WAS SAYING MISSION MORE TIME

02:06 - 30.080 I WOULD NOTE BECOMES EXPERT IN

02:06 - 31.370 ONE OF THE CO-DEFENDANTS CASES

02:06 - 32.100 TO MISTER LEHMANN.

02:06 - 34.130 WAS AGREED TO BY DEFENSE

02:06 - 35.310 COUNSEL AND WE DIDN'T NEED TO

02:06 - 37.340 HAVE THE COST OF AN EXPERT

02:06 - 37.840 TESTIFY.

02:06 - 41.490 IN LIGHT OF THIS WE BELIEVE

02:06 - 43.240 THAT THE IMPOSITION OF COST BY

02:06 - 45.070 THE TRIAL COURT WAS NOT AN

02:06 - 46.420 UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN POSITION.

02:06 - 48.600 THEY'RE GOING TO QUESTION I'VE

02:06 - 49.570 SEEN IN SOME OF THE MAKE HIS

02:06 - 51.560 BRIEFS WHETHER OR NOT IN A

02:06 - 53.090 POSITION OF COST OF RE

02:06 - 54.870 SENTENCING. SEATS COST OF

02:06 - 57.280 PROSECUTION. TO THAT I WOULD

02:06 - 58.380 SAY THAT THE PENNSYLVANIA

02:06 - 59.780 SUPREME COURT HAS SPECIFICALLY

02:06 - 01.510 DEFINE COST OF PROSECUTION

02:07 - 03.900 AS INCLUDING THE SECOND COST I

02:07 - 05.520 WOULD REFER TO THE CASE SAY TO

02:07 - 06.050 MY BRIEF.

02:07 - 08.300 I'M ALL FOR SAYS MARKET YOUR

02:07 - 09.970 BRIEF AND NOW WE APPRECIATE YOU

02:07 - 10.380 OWNING

02:07 - 10.890 THE DEAD.

02:07 - 13.320 >>WE'VE GOT TO ASK YOU TO LIMIT

02:07 - 15.170 THAT TO 3 MINUTES SHARE WHICH

02:07 - 16.680 IS NOW OVER SO.

02:07 - 20.460 >>WELL. IT ASKED THE JUSTICES

02:07 - 20.830 THAT.

02:07 - 24.250 TO POSE TO ANY QUESTIONS YOU

02:07 - 26.360 MIGHT AND STARTING WITH JUSTICE

02:07 - 28.960 OR DIRTY. IF

02:07 - 29.930 YOU COUNCIL.

02:07 - 32.190 >>WITH REGARD TO THE SPECIFIC

02:07 - 33.960 STATUTE WHICH YOU KNOW REALLY

02:07 - 36.060 ITS DISCRETION.

02:07 - 39.280 THE COURT TO DETERMINE WHETHER

02:07 - 40.800 IT SHOULD BE PAID FOR THE

02:07 - 41.760 DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S

02:07 - 44.230 INVESTIGATION. APPREHENSION AND

02:07 - 46.860 PROSECUTION. IT DOES NOT

02:07 - 49.030 SAY SENTENCING SENTENCING

02:07 - 50.850 BEING SEPARATE AND DIFFERENT

02:07 - 53.140 FROM THE PROSECUTION WHERE THE

02:07 - 54.640 BURDEN ON YOU BEYOND A

02:07 - 56.510 REASONABLE DOUBT. WHY

02:07 - 59.100 SHOULD WE BUT SOMETHING INTO

02:07 - 01.140 A STATUE THAT THE GENERAL

02:08 - 04.310 ASSEMBLY CHOSE NOT. VERY GOOD

02:08 - 06.430 AND THAT IS SPECIFICALLY WHY

02:08 - 07.470 WAS REFERRING TO COME WALKER

02:08 - 09.660 SAYS THE. IN CARMEL FOR SUNDAY

02:08 - 10.930 BE THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME

02:08 - 13.660 COURT. IN 1974,

02:08 - 15.550 SPECIFICALLY DECIDED THAT'S

02:08 - 17.290 WHERE THE LEGISLATURE IMPOSE A

02:08 - 19.120 REQUIREMENT THAT QUOTE.

02:08 - 21.530 MADE ALL PERSONS CONVICTED OF A

02:08 - 23.250 CRIME LIABLE FOR THE COST OF

02:08 - 24.830 THEIR PROSECUTION. THE

02:08 - 25.990 PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT

02:08 - 28.490 HELD. QUOTE IT IS CLEAR THE

02:08 - 30.080 LEGISLATURE INTENDED TO INCLUDE

02:08 - 32.240 IN IN THE COST A FORTUNE IF

02:08 - 33.690 CONVICTED PERSONS LIABLE.

02:08 - 35.670 THE COST OF ALL PROCEEDINGS.

02:08 - 37.360 WRECK WAS IT. FINALLY THE

02:08 - 37.930 DISPOSITION OF

02:08 - 39.230 THE CASE BUT PERCENT OF

02:08 - 40.440 KNOWLEDGE ON SPEC BACK

02:08 - 43.320 EXTRADITION CASE RIGHT.

02:08 - 45.480 >>IT WAS ACTUALLY A PAROLE

02:08 - 46.180 VIOLATION CASE,

02:08 - 47.800 YOUR HONOR. THIS IS SOMETHING

02:08 - 49.770 CALLED SENT TO THE CRIME THEM

02:08 - 51.230 CORRECT. BUT THEY BUT THE

02:08 - 52.830 PROBLEM WAS THAT THE DEFENDING

02:08 - 54.470 CONTESTED THE JURISDICTION.

02:08 - 56.860 MAD TO BE EXTRADITED SOMETHING

02:08 - 58.570 THAT HE OR SHE CAUSED THE ON

02:08 - 00.380 THEIR OWN. THE ELECTION AS

02:09 - 02.710 OPPOSED TO A SUPREME COURT

02:09 - 03.700 FINDING THEM IN A LEGAL

02:09 - 05.470 SENTENCE POSING A RECENT.

02:09 - 09.010 I CAN EASILY DISTINGUISHED 81

02:09 - 09.580 LCA.

02:09 - 12.090 >>THE OWNER THERE'S NOT A WHOLE

02:09 - 14.320 LOT ON THIS THE QUESTION AS TO

02:09 - 16.120 WHETHER I I GUESS MY MY MAIN

02:09 - 18.890 QUESTION IS OR IS THE ARGUMENT

02:09 - 20.260 WHETHER IT SIMPLY CAN'T BE

02:09 - 22.990 IMPOSED OR WHETHER IT CAN BE

02:09 - 23.700 IMPOSED UNDER

02:09 - 25.620 REASONABLE CIRCUMSTANCES IF WE

02:09 - 27.290 LOOK AT ME WHEN THE LEGISLATURE

02:09 - 28.870 RIGHT THERE LAWS LEGISLATURE'S

02:09 - 30.470 FORCED TO RELY ON WHAT EXISTS

02:09 - 32.550 DAVIES BASICALLY WHAT EXISTS

02:09 - 34.380 AND IT SPECIFICALLY SAYS IT

02:09 - 36.310 INCLUDES ALL PROCEEDINGS

02:09 - 37.170 REQUISITE FOR FINAL

02:09 - 37.780 DISPOSITION.

02:09 - 41.870 I'M THE BEST SHE REFERRING

02:09 - 43.520 TO COST OF PROSECUTION, THE

02:09 - 44.760 LEGISLATURE CAN REASONABLY

02:09 - 46.060 RELIED THAT THAT'S WHAT WOULD

02:09 - 47.080 BE IN TURKEY WOULD CONTINUE TO

02:09 - 47.890 BE INTERPRETED TO BE.

02:09 - 50.650 >>BUT WE CAN ALSO FOLLOW YOUR

02:09 - 51.230 LOGIC WE

02:09 - 53.360 CAN INTERPRET WE BURNED OR ZONE

02:09 - 54.970 IS BEING SINCE THEY WERE ALL IN

02:09 - 57.180 STRIDE. THE PROSECUTION AND THE

02:09 - 58.430 DEFENDANT DID NOT HAVE TO BEAR

02:09 - 00.230 RESPONSIBILITY. THIS RE

02:10 - 01.910 SENTENCING WAS CAUSED BY THE

02:10 - 03.320 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

02:10 - 04.960 THEREFORE NOT RESPONSIBLE GOOD

02:10 - 05.250 FUN.

02:10 - 08.520 THEY'RE NOW FOR NOW I WOULD

02:10 - 09.490 DISAGREE WITH THAT YOUR HONOR

02:10 - 10.460 IN IN THIS CASE.

02:10 - 12.900 >>HAD BE THE SITUATION NEVER

02:10 - 14.970 EXISTED AND HE HAD THIS SENSE

02:10 - 16.890 THE SCHEME THAT WE HAVE NOW OUR

02:10 - 18.090 DIFFERENT IN OUR JUVENILE

02:10 - 19.820 DISSENT IN JUVENILE LIFER IT'S

02:10 - 21.900 SUBJECT TO A MANDATORY MINIMUM

02:10 - 23.220 AND THEN.

02:10 - 26.250 MAXIMUM OF A MANDATORY LIFE.

02:10 - 28.800 EVEN TODAY. IF WE WANT TO

02:10 - 30.740 EITHER. ASKED THE COURT FOR

02:10 - 31.570 SOMETHING THAT'S ABOVE THE

02:10 - 33.280 MANDATORY MINIMUM OR

02:10 - 35.070 WE WANT TO PURSUE A LIFE

02:10 - 35.990 WITHOUT PAROLE, WHICH REMAINS

02:10 - 37.090 AN OPTION IF WE CAN SHOW IN

02:10 - 38.690 COURT ABILITY. WE WOULD HAVE

02:10 - 40.020 HAD TO CLOSE THIS COST THE

02:10 - 41.450 REGION TIME. THE FACT THAT

02:10 - 43.200 THOSE COSTS NEVER EXISTED.

02:10 - 44.720 IN THE FIRST TIME IN THE FIRST

02:10 - 46.900 SENSING IT'S NOT I MEAN THAT

02:10 - 48.450 THIS NEVER EXIST IN THIS CASE

02:10 - 51.180 HAD THE ERROR. FORT LEE

02:10 - 53.460 ARGUABLY IT'S AN ERROR FOR THE

02:10 - 55.910 ORIGINAL SENTENCING. THESE

02:10 - 58.220 COSTS WERE NOT P COSTS. THEY

02:10 - 59.540 WERE NOT PLUS THAT SHOULD HAVE

02:10 - 00.690 NEVER BEEN CLOSE THESE ARE

02:11 - 02.570 COSTS IF THIS PRACTICE

02:11 - 03.770 REPRESSED YOU TODAY WILL

02:11 - 05.610 BE REQUIRED AND SIMPLY WEREN'T

02:11 - 06.470 REQUIRED OF THE DIFFERENT

02:11 - 07.290 TODAY, SO IT'S NOT A

02:11 - 08.970 DUPLICATION OF COST. IT'S NOT

02:11 - 10.480 A WASTE AND THEREFORE WE

02:11 - 11.570 BELIEVE IT'S APPROPRIATE FOR

02:11 - 12.790 HIM TO BE IMPOSED IN THIS CASE.

02:11 - 13.860 THANK YOU.

02:11 - 17.220 ACT. THANK YOU CHIEF JUSTICE

02:11 - 19.160 COUNCIL. THE STATUTE

02:11 - 21.220 SAYS THAT THE DEFENDANT MUST

02:11 - 23.690 PAY THE COST OF PROSECUTION AND

02:11 - 24.620 TRIAL.

02:11 - 27.310 >>IF PROSECUTION.

02:11 - 30.350 INCLUDES EVERYTHING INCLUDING

02:11 - 32.020 SENTENCING WHAT'S THE PURPOSE

02:11 - 33.380 OF WORDS IN TRIAL.

02:11 - 37.370 >>I WOULD SAY YOUR HONOR IT

02:11 - 38.920 COSTS THAT WE DO WE COLLUDE THE

02:11 - 41.620 COST OF PROSECUTION. THAT GO

02:11 - 42.770 BEYOND TRIAL.

02:11 - 46.560 ANY TYPE OF SITUATION WHERE

02:11 - 47.750 WE'RE DOING A PRE TRIAL.

02:11 - 51.280 EXTRADITION IF YOU'RE DOING

02:11 - 52.540 PRETRIAL HEARINGS IF WE'RE IN

02:11 - 54.260 THE JUVENILE COURT. AND WE ARE

02:11 - 55.230 SEEKING TO HAVE SOMEONE

02:11 - 56.390 CERTIFIED TO ADULT COURT.

02:11 - 58.820 THOSE TAPES OF COSTS WOULDN'T

02:11 - 59.790 BE TRIAL. BUT THEY WOULD BE

02:11 - 00.670 COSTS RELATED TO THE

02:12 - 03.380 PROSECUTION. BY

02:12 - 05.410 STATING THAT SUPPRESSED YOU

02:12 - 06.700 SURE TO BE IMPOSED UPON AN

02:12 - 09.110 ADULT AND FOR ME. TREND THAT'S

02:12 - 10.100 CONVICTED AS AN ADULT.

02:12 - 12.000 WE BELIEVE INCORPORATE ALL

02:12 - 13.280 THOSE COSTS INCLUDING PROBATION

02:12 - 14.680 VIOLATIONS AND SUBSEQUENT

02:12 - 16.190 ISSUES SUCH AS PC ARIAS.

02:12 - 19.480 LET ME ASK

02:12 - 23.860 YOU RECOGNIZE

02:12 - 26.540 THAT IN THE BATS CASE WE WE

02:12 - 28.100 ANTICIPATED JOB

02:12 - 29.820 THAT EXPERTS ARE GOING TO BE

02:12 - 31.670 NEEDED IN MOST OF THESE CASES

02:12 - 33.090 THESE POSTS, MONTGOMERY CASES,

02:12 - 33.440 RIGHT.

02:12 - 35.560 >>YES, SURE YOU RECOGNIZE THAT

02:12 - 39.560 SO. AS A CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER.

02:12 - 41.020 HOW

02:12 - 43.630 CAN WE HOW CAN WE JUDGE

02:12 - 46.640 THESE INMATES WOULD

02:12 - 49.270 BE ON NOTICE THAT 35 YEARS OR

02:12 - 50.500 WHATEVER ON ON.

02:12 - 53.610 THIS KIND OF A SEA CHANGE IN

02:12 - 55.560 THE LAW IS GOING TO OCCUR HOW

02:12 - 57.570 CAN PUTTING ASIDE ALLEGATIONS

02:12 - 59.250 OF MALFEASANCE IS NO ALLEGATION

02:12 - 00.380 IN THIS CASE OF COMMONWEALTH

02:13 - 02.600 MALFEASANCE HOW DO WE PUT THE

02:13 - 03.310 BURDEN.

02:13 - 06.700 ON THE INMATE AT THIS POINT.

02:13 - 08.440 WHEN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE

02:13 - 10.420 UNITED STATES HAS MADE.

02:13 - 13.570 THIS A SEA CHANGE IN THE LAW.

02:13 - 18.610 YOU'RE DOING NEVER GUARD IS

02:13 - 20.650 TWOFOLD FIRST WOULD BE IF

02:13 - 21.710 YOU'RE LOOKING AT FROM AN EX

02:13 - 23.200 POST FACTO TYPE SITUATION.

02:13 - 24.770 >>THE ARGUMENT

02:13 - 26.980 IS THAT BY IMPOSING A LESSER

02:13 - 28.170 TYPE OF SITUATION ARE GRANTING

02:13 - 30.090 THE DIFFERENT ABILITY TO PURSUE

02:13 - 31.330 A SENTENCE THAT IS LESSER THAN

02:13 - 32.240 WHAT WAS IMPOSED.

02:13 - 34.240 THE FACT THAT THERE'S A COST TO

02:13 - 35.350 RECEIVE THAT BENEFIT.

02:13 - 37.500 SHOULD NOT BE JUST A BOON

02:13 - 38.340 GRANTED TO THE DEFENDANT.

02:13 - 42.060 I MEAN, AS I NOTED PREVIOUSLY

02:13 - 42.860 IN MY HEART MY

02:13 - 44.040 OPENING STATEMENT. THERE ARE

02:13 - 45.570 DEFENDANTS SPECIFICALLY YOUR

02:13 - 46.980 COUNTY DEFENDANTS AMONG OUR I